Equivocating on the term ‘deconstruction’ is the latest gatekeeping tactic.
Months ago the big joke was: “How many of these millennial evangelicals have even heard of Derrida, amirite? lolz. 🙄”
Months ago the big joke was: “How many of these millennial evangelicals have even heard of Derrida, amirite? lolz. 🙄”
Now those *exact same dudes* are wringing their hands about how all these kids embracing Derrida need to understand that the path they’re on leads straight to utter nihilism.
Well which is it?
Does so-called “deconstruction” have nothing to do with Derrida, or do we actually need to be concerned about the alleged implications of Derrida’s theories?
Does so-called “deconstruction” have nothing to do with Derrida, or do we actually need to be concerned about the alleged implications of Derrida’s theories?
Or is it that the gatekeepers decided to change the subject to Derrida because that’s a fight they think they can win, even though it has nothing to do with evangelicals interrogating their presuppositions?
Yeah, it’s that.
Yeah, it’s that.
I gotta say, the thought of these dudes *struggling* through Derrida’s prose to mine for incriminating quotes is pretty satisfying.
But no, the concern is fabricated. Derrida is yet another shiny object.
But no, the concern is fabricated. Derrida is yet another shiny object.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
