Do you remember when Boris Johnson tried and failed to get Owen Paterson off the hook? And then the media released the political pressure on him over Tory sleaze by reporting the Government planned to curb second jobs?
It's become part of the natural rhythm of our politics. Government gets itself into trouble, it makes a bullshit announcement that it will 'fix' the problem, the 'media' misreports the announcement, political pressure evaporates. Then, later, Government ditches the announcement.
I know it's convenient to talk about Johnson being a brilliant politician. But the truth is more complicated. He gets away with his repeated misconduct because we don't have a functioning media. And, in particular, because of the BBC's failures.
(And, yes, I did say this at the time.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Funny how there's no end of police resource when it comes to peaceful protestors. And bugger all when it comes to investigating criminality at Number 10.
He meets a man from the Russian Embassy who he thinks is a spy. They go for a burger - which is absolutely a normal response to meeting someone you think is a Russian spy.
The Russian, Sergey Nalobin, pumps Guido for information. And they become friends.
Exactly what anyone would do confronted by an agent of Putin, isn't it?
The Russian invites him to a drinks party at the Russian embassy and then the Russians start putting money into Paul Staines' business. Totally normal to have Russians putting money your way.
We bought so much PPE we spent more three quarters of a billion pounds storing it - and (as of December 2021) we continued to spend £600,000 A DAY.
Even now, having paused buying, we still have 3 years supply of aprons, 2.5 years of waste bags, 18 years of eye protectors, 9 years of gowns, 5 years of hand hygiene, 2.5 years of IIR masks, 3 years of FFP3 masks. All purchased at (on average) five times normal prices.
I guess, reflecting on this some more, for me, two things seep through the (largely) careful prose in Dr Cass' report. One is a conspicuously genuine desire to make things better for trans children and young people but the other is...
a deep scepticism, which reflects where so many who hold institutional power in the UK are, about the reality of trans existence.
If you can't shake the feeling in your bones that being trans is an illness, your instinct is always going to be to 'cure' it. So much of England still thinks, in contrast to learning elsewhere like at the WHO, of being trans as a pathology.
So Hilary Cass' interim review into gender identity services for children and young people is just out... some initial thoughts. 🧵
First, you will read lots of views about whether Dr Cass' report neutrally captures the evidence base. One of the big problems in this space is that what is fundamentally a medical issue for specialists and patients has become a political battleground.
I'm not going to add to that problem by talking about her evidence base and I'd suggest you scrutinise the expertise of those who do. This isn't an ideological assessment. Like not needing to hold views on the proper treatment of bowel cancer you don't need to hold views on this.
We are concerned about this. It's not clear how Fraser was appointed. And it's hard to make the case that he is politically independent. Charities can't retain public trust if they are tools of the Government. We are speaking to our lawyers. theguardian.com/society/2022/m…
We have today written to lawyers for Nadine Dorries in connection with her decision to appoint (another) friend of Boris Johnson as Chair of the Charity Commission without a proper process. glplive.org/1603-cc-letter
The first friend of Boris' that Nadine Dorries appointed was Martin Thomas who then resigned before taking up his appointment over bullying allegations: