“If you prepare for war you get war, if you prepare for peace you get peace.”
―Ukrainian peace activist Yurii Sheliazhenko
Our new report reveals why the EU should not fund the research and development of new weapons. 🧵👇🏽
The EU began funding the development of military wares in 2017.
It then increased its military budget by 1250% from one budgetary cycle to another.
It is increasingly intent on investing in militarism and preparing for war rather than prioritising peace.
Through the European Defence Fund (EDF) and its precursor programmes, Europe’s largest arms companies gifted themselves hundreds of millions of 💰in tax money.
They did this using their power as members of the Group of Personalities, an EU advisory body on defence spending.
The EU funds companies accused of corruption: Five of the eight largest beneficiaries of the EDF’s precursor programmes - Leonardo, Safran, Thales, Airbus, and Saab - had substantial corruption allegations levelled against them or associated companies.
Most of the programmes' funding goes to Europe’s largest arms companies located in France, Germany, Italy and Spain, showing that the funds are mostly being used to subsidise the already highly lucrative arms industry.
The EDF and its precursor programmes will develop the next generation of lethal weapon systems.
But these developments are largely unregulated and the ethical and legal checks mainly rely on self-assessments by the applicants themselves.
Another issue is the lack of transparency: The EU Commission withheld information when requested, including their legal and ethical audits.
The Ombudsman’s office found it concerning ‘that there is no detailed assessment of the compliance of projects with international law’.
Political and social problems can never be resolved militarily. Beefing up defence capacity only contributes to instability and tension.
The EU must return to its founding principles of promoting peace.
The EU has adopted a ‘business as usual’ approach to Israel as it perpetrates a genocide in Gaza.
Ahead of the parliamentary elections, our new research argues that by providing political cover and material support to Israel, the EU is complicit in genocide 🧵
For decades, the EU has maintained close ties with Israel, treating it as a de facto member state, even as it expanded its illegal occupation of Palestine and invaded and waged war in neighbouring territory.
This has not changed even with Israel now on trial for genocide.
Since 7 October, the EU has approved 130 Horizon Europe research projects involving Israeli entities in receipt of €126 million.
Israel Aerospace Industries, one of Israel’s largest arms companies, got almost €640,000, while Israel’s Ministry of Health got almost €1 million.
During the 2011 Arab Spring and the Occupy movement, social media was seen as a technology of liberation.
Yet ten years on, social media is more associated with surveillance, repression and misinformation.
What should progressive forces do? 👇🧵
Activists have typically used four tactics to resist digital power:
✨ Abstain and boycott mainstream platforms
✨Attack and confront Big Tech
✨Build Alternative platforms
✨Adapt to corporate platforms to build popular support
In practice, activists need to use all four tactics in combination as each tactic has its advantages and drawbacks and is needed for particular contexts.
But to defeat Big Tech and the right, we must go further.
But a decade on, EU policies are less likely to promote peace and more likely to contribute to instability, violence and war.
With the holidays coming up, let's take a look at the EU’s actual commitment to peace: 🧵👇
🇪🇺Border violence: Thousands of refugees attempting to reach safety inside the EU are facing unprecedented levels of violence including beatings and sexual assault. theguardian.com/law/2022/dec/0…
🇪🇺Border externalisation: The EU has made bilateral and multilateral agreements with countries outside of Europe that effectively make them the border guards of Europe.
Many of these countries are run by authoritarian regimes that are propped up and supported with EU funds.
We all know that industrial livestock farming is destroying the planet.
But is going vegan the only way to save the planet?
On the occasion of World Food Day, here are some key takeaways about different types of livestock keeping that can contribute to real climate solutions👇
In industrial farming, animals usually spend their short lives confined in small areas where they are fed industrially produced crops like corn and soy.
As we all know, the ecological costs of this system are huge.
But there is another way of raising animals that makes use of variable landscapes by moving animals and managing their grazing.
It provides livelihoods for many millions of people and makes use of rangelands across more than half the world’s land surface.