(1) I am watching an enormous amount of leveraging and "sliming" in the SBC right now.
This particular direction of political dirty tricks and false accusations began when men stopped talking about their differences and began to use the political strategies of the left.
(2) And by embracing this course of action those in the elite circles have decided that being able to honestly discuss our differences in theology, ideology and direction of the SBC was not feasible as honest and transparent debate is not possible...
(3) as the current regime has embraced the notion that there is a "system of power" that needs to be hierarchically dismantled and replaced. So to have a conversation with those that believe that the SBC needs to proceed in an objectively based faith that opposes...
(4) Critical Social Justice, is to cede "power" to those that oppose the revolutionary movement that has been unleashed on the SBC.
This needs to be the honest conversation that should be happening in the SBC...
(5) But instead of the open and honest conversation and debate that needed to happen in the SBC, those committed to the move of Critical Social Justice (and eventually the system of ESG) decided to take the road of the progressive DNC and the establishment Republicans.
(6)So yes, those committed to the ESG transition took the lead of personal destruction.
The problem is - that road normally ends in *everyone* being destroyed -mostly by propaganda, false accusations and fertile fallacies.
And so, necessarily - lawsuits will begin to fly
(7) And instead of having conversations and the open and honest debate - everyone is a space of non-trust.
Nothing is being done in good faith.
But, I do want to remind my SBC friends that bought the lies of the @wef and @CFR_org years ago:
(8) I tried to speak to all of you - honestly.
I tried to reason with all of you - as a Brother in the Lord.
And you decided to attack not only me but other good and honest men.
And I will never lie about any of our SBC adversaries. Never. Not once. And...
(9) I really would greatly prefer to make this about the actual issues and direction of the SBC, Christianity, faith and civilization itself.
And we can still have that conversation.
And most of you have my cell #.
I'll leave it at that...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is something that most don't consider as an unhelpful tool of deconstructing the delivering of the Gospel. Yes, it helps to reach thousands, but it also allows the one speaking to stay in an eternal whisper - taking the masculinity out of preaching.
This really started to hit me when I began leading Reformation tours in Switzerland, Germany, and the UK. Martin Luther did not use the aid of a microphone - neither did Calvin, Knox, Latimer or even Spurgeon.
We will need "reformational" preaching to steer out of this hole.
And while some might have great knowledge - they also are somehow lacking the testosterone necessary to lead in the face of great danger and great error.
Bold preaching isn't whispered preaching. Bold preaching needs the necessary element of both truth and the guts to preach it
@TomBuck (2) After I attempted to discuss the issues *again* in 2019 there was a coordinated "all seminary presidents" hit job on @tomascol - and I mean horribly nasty and without an ounce of truth.
So, I was not going to dip to their low depths but...
(3) I just started releasing clips, statements and audio of SBTS Provost Matt Hall. And more from Jarvis Williams. And more from everyone.
And yes, I revealed some of the more grotesque funding sources in 2017.
(1) At CPAC 2022, their primary theme was "Awake Not Woke" which was odd as they didn't have anyone who has sponsored their conference over the past 6 years (Sovereign), James Lindsay, Jordan Peterson or any other topic specialist address the issue.
(2) In fact, CPAC went the opposite direction over the past several years confusing the entire issue:
-Having Van Jones as a featured speaker
-Having Tulsi Gabbard as the keynote at the Reagan Dinner
-Having a panel with advocated "putting the identity back into politics"
(3) But the entire drift of CPAC, even while eventually inviting Trump, has been to the progressive left. A "synthesis" of progressive concepts intermingled with true conservativism has resulted in a confusing mess.
In 2019 I was at the CPAC planning committee meeting and each roundtable of 8 or so VIPs was asked to discuss what issues we believe are crucial to be discussed at CPAC 2020.
(2) When it was my turn, I passionately explained that dangerous ideologies such as CRT and intersectionality will be tearing our nation apart and that we must do everything necessary to remove these Neo-Marxist concepts from our society.
(3) As soon as I finished, the libertarian gentlemen next to me (from CATO) stepped up and said "Well, I am going to say the opposite of what he just said, we need to use CRT and intersectionality to our advantage and help to provide opportunities to other diverse groups."
(1) What you need to know about Ukraine that you didn't know:
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy starred in the Ukrainian television series where he played a school teacher who is elected as the President of Ukraine.
(2) President Zelenskyy's political party was formed in 2017. The party is named after the hit Ukrainian TV series "Servant of the People" with Zelenskyy playing the part of the President:
(3) The current leadership of Ukraine in many ways appears to be a simulation of an actual government - a set of actors who are larping a "Truman Show" type of production where the scripts, actions, and decisions are made by others and the officials play their roles.
Does everyone remember all of the horrific "leaked" videos and pictures from China in January and February of 2020 that showed bodies lying in the street and the needed draconian response from the Chinese Government? You do realize that all of it was propaganda, right?
And so you voluntarily destroyed your business by staying home
You voluntarily helped to destroy our economy
All spurred on by a gigantic fertile fallacy powered by reflexivity for the purposes of allowing technocrats to make a global power-grab
And there was never a period of more than 10 seconds that you didn't receive the next push notification on your phone, never a moment that you didn't have legacy media, politicians, social media, and print telling you the latest news on the fertile fallacy:this lasted for 2 years