80 000 ppl attended Z-rally in Moscow. Midwits compared its size with smaller anti-war protests and concluded it's a proof of mass Z-enthusiasm. Midwits are unable to comprehend two factors that rule this world: leverage and incentives 🧵
Journalist is asking Z-attendees "Friends, wanna give a small comment - what does this day mean for you?" They turn away in silence. He insists - they shake their heads and refuse to answer. Finally he asks - why did you come? Response "They pushed us into a bus and brought here"
When looking at Z-rallies in Russia you need to understand they're all 100% staged. Putin suppresses any independent political action and won't allow any protest either pro- or against war. Russian nationalists who are trying to do Z-rallies are arrested and threatened with jail
Kremlin allows only one single type of rallies - the ones which it orchestrated. Putin doesn't want any enthusiasts. That makes sense. If you have convictions, you may support Putin out of conviction. But it also means you may fight Putin out of convictions. You are dangerous
Putin wants only controllable people who do whatever they are told. He promotes such people o all positions of power, which explains poor Russian performance in economy, war, technology, etc. This also explains why he forces unenthusiastic people to political rallies
The main tool for filling pro-government rallies in Russia is сгон бюджетников - pressing the government employees. Government forces university, vocational school ПТУ and other students, school teachers, doctors, civil servants and whoever is on payroll to come to rallies
This for example is a public protest of an independent teachers' union Учитель. In 2014 teachers were forced to participate in demonstrations in support of the Donbass War and annexation of Crimea, and the union protested against it. You can find dozens of such publications
And this is a WhatsApp chat message. Administration forces teachers to collect school kids letters, paintings and posters in support of Z-invasion of Ukraine
This may be the most creative illustration of how they use administrative resource to demonstrate support of Z-campaign. They forced terminally ill children from hospice and their parents to form a Z-letter, supporting the invasion
How does сгон бюджетников work in practice? You command people on government's payroll to come to pick up point. You put them on a bus and drive them to Moscow. When the rally is over, you put them on a bus and drive home. This time they brought people from as far as Smolensk
If you think about it, it makes total sense. These people don't want to come, they are bored, want to go home. They don't do anything stupid, don't network. If you brought real enthusiasts they would network which is super dangerous. You just need to feed them and put onto a bus
Huge size of pro-war rallies is explained by government fully using its leverage and incentives to make people come. They literally order this school to bring 50 people, that civil service office to bring 100 and will fire the boss if he doesn't fill the quota of fake protesters
Yekaterinburg. This woman says she supports the Z-operation (though standing with the poster "for peace"). However, when asked why did she come she responded - they asked us and we came
The only articulate statement in support of the war I've seen so far. She is very happy Putin restored the authority of the country and thinks that display of Russian flags is very patriotic
This is a more typical case:
- Why did you come here?
- They called us
- Did they tell where you are going
- No, they said it will be some event, that's all
Some Z-supporters express even less enthusiasm and run away from cameras. They lool very uncomfortable and probably ashamed of attending the pro war rally
On the other hand, government uses its leverage to discourage people from protesting against the war. Here police breaks the door of Timur Tuhvatullin to arrest. He's accused of "inciting the mass riots"
Police are searching the homes of those who signed an open letter, condemning the Z-war - designer Anna Kantser, activist Gulnaz Ravilova and politician Russian Zinatullin. They had to open the door after police started cutting it
They started a criminal investigation against Liberman, a philosophy teacher of Kazan university who wrote an open letter condemning the war and started collecting students, professors and alumni signatures under it
Tons of people arrested for protesting against the war. All of prisons and detention centres in Moscow and nearby, like Saharovo, are full with people. Now they are treated much harsher than before. Last year they didn't typically beat arrested people, now they do
At this point things didn't get that bad yet. For example this guy who spit on Z letter will be just fined between 30 000 - 50 000 rubles. However, now, after Putin declared that society should "self-clean" such acts might entail far harsher consequences
This sort of explains why we see so much public support of Z-war and so little condemnation of it. Government uses leverage and incentives to promote the former and suppress the latter. This quite cringe propaganda video explains it much better than I could. Watch it. End of 🧵
The primary weakness of this argument is that being true, historically speaking, it is just false in the context of American politics where the “communism” label has been so over-used (and misapplied) that it lost all of its former power:
“We want X”
“No, that is communism”
“We want communism”
Basically, when you use a label like “communism” as a deus ex machina winning you every argument, you simultaneously re-define its meaning. And when you use it to beat off every popular socio economic demand (e.g. universal healthcare), you re-define communism as a synthesis of all the popular socio economic demands
Historical communism = forced industrial development in a poor, predominantly agrarian country, funded through expropriation of the peasantry
(With the most disastrous economic and humanitarian consequences)
Many are trying to explain his success with some accidental factors such as his “personal charisma”, Cuomo's weakness etc
Still, I think there may be some fundamental factors here. A longue durée shift, and a very profound one
1. Public outrage does not work anymore
If you look at Zohran, he is calm, constructive, and rarely raises his voice. I think one thing that Mamdani - but almost no one else in the American political space is getting - is that the public is getting tired of the outrage
Outrage, anger, righteous indignation have all been the primary drivers of American politics for quite a while
For a while, this tactics worked
Indeed, when everyone around is polite, and soft (and insincere), freaking out was a smart thing to do. It could help you get noticed
People don’t really understand causal links. We pretend we do (“X results in Y”). But we actually don’t. Most explanations (= descriptions of causal structures) are fake.
There may be no connection between X and Y at all. The cause is just misattributed.
Or, perhaps, X does indeed result in Y. but only under a certain (and unknown!) set of conditions that remains totally and utterly opaque to us. So, X->Y is only a part of the equation
And so on
I like to think of a hypothetical Stone Age farmer who started farming, and it worked amazingly, and his entire community adopted his lifestyle, and many generations followed it and prospered and multiplied, until all suddenly wiped out in a new ice age
1. Normative Islamophobia that used to define the public discourse being the most acceptable form of racial & ethnic bigotry in the West, is receding. It is not so much dying as rather - failing to replicate. It is not that the old people change their views as that the young do not absorb their prejudice any longer.
In fact, I incline to think it has been failing to replicate for a while, it is just that we have not been paying attention
Again, the change of vibe does not happen at once. The Muslim scare may still find (some) audience among the more rigid elderly, who are not going to change their views. But for the youth, it is starting to sound as archaic as the Catholic scare of know nothings
Out of date
2. What is particularly interesting regarding Mamdani's victory, is his support base. It would not be much of an exaggeration to say that its core is comprised of the young (and predominantly white) middle classes, with a nearly equal representation of men and women
What does Musk vs Trump affair teach us about the general patterns of human history? Well, first of all it shows that the ancient historians were right. They grasped something about nature of politics that our contemporaries simply can’t.
Let me give you an example. The Arab conquest of Spain
According to a popular medieval/early modern interpretation, its primary cause was the lust of Visigoth king Roderic. Aroused by the beautiful daughter of his vassal and ally, count Julian, he took advantage of her
Disgruntled, humiliated Julian allied himself with the Arabs and opens them the gates of Spain.
Entire kingdom lost, all because the head of state caused a personal injury to someone important.
One thing you need to understand about wars is that very few engage into the long, protracted warfare on purpose. Almost every war of attrition was planned and designed as a short victorious blitzkrieg
And then everything went wrong
Consider the Russian war in Ukraine. It was not planned as a war. It was not thought of as a war. It was planned as a (swift!) regime change allowing to score a few points in the Russian domestic politics. And then everything went wrong
It would not be an exaggeration to say that planning a short victorious war optimised for the purposes of domestic politics is how you *usually* end up in a deadlock. That is the most common scenario of how it happens, practically speaking