Zoe Tillman Profile picture
Mar 21 86 tweets 14 min read
Hello from the DC federal courthouse, where a one-day bench trial is set for Cowboys for Trump founder Couy Griffin, facing misdemeanor charges for going to the Capitol on Jan. 6.

On how things have gotten complicated for the govt leading up to today:
On Couy Griffin's arrest and the allegations against him: buzzfeednews.com/article/claudi…

"It’s a great day for America. The people are showing that they have had enough. People are ready for fair and legal elections, or this is what you’re gonna get and you’re gonna get more of it."
There won't be a public line to listen remotely to today's court proceedings. We've been told there'll be an audio stream in the media room, and the public/press will be allowed in the courtroom (there's no jury, which means more space than the Guy Reffitt trial)
Sorry to everyone hoping to kick off Monday with a horse sighting
Can confirm Griffin is wearing a black cowboy hat, he's still waiting to get through the security line at the courthouse
Brief chat with Couy Griffin as he walked to the elevator, seemed upbeat, said he's ready for his day in court. In addition to the cowboy hat, he's wearing a white shirt with "C4T" on the collar. Mask below his nose.

Guard: "Sir put your mask on your face"

Griffin: "Okay!"
Judge Trevor McFadden takes the bench (I'm in the media room where it's audio only, so no visual descriptions I'm afraid)
McFadden asks if everyone is ready for trial, Griffin's lawyer Nicholas Smith addresses recent motions they filed accusing the govt of producing evidence days before trial that they haven't been able to fully go through, incl. videos, defense wants those struck
As an aside, McFadden also says that if anyone wants to remove their mask in the courtroom they can (you still have to wear a mask in public areas of the courthouse, but judges can manage their courtrooms as they see fit at this stage)
Before getting to the evidence-related issues raised by the defense, McFadden is taking a step back to confirm that Griffin wants to waive his right to a jury trial and proceed with a bench trial before the judge alone
McFadden asked standard questions, incl. if Griffin had taken drugs/consumed alcohol in the last 24 hours, Griffin initially says no, but then clarifies he had a couple beers last night at the hotel (feels clear-headed now, judge has him confirm)
McFadden addresses defense motion for govt to disclose any photos that may exist in the Archives of Pence in an underground garage where he was reportedly taken on Jan. 6 — judge is denying, saying generally production rules only apply to materials the govt (aka prosecutors) has
McFadden rejects the govt's final push to limit questioning of a Secret Service agent about where exactly they took VP Pence while Couy Griffin was on the grounds
AUSA says this puts the govt in a bind, because there is surveillance video re: Pence's location, and it was not turned over to the defense because USCP contends it's covered by shield for sensitive info. Prosecutors had it, possession has since been clawed back to USCP
McFadden says this is the trial date, and asks if the govt wants to show the defense the video over lunch. AUSA says they can't. USCP general counsel gets up to explain that the USCP board would have to give its approval to show the video to a third party now
McFadden isn't budging, says that the govt can dismiss the case or proceed with trial now (he's not going to allow more time for the USCP board to approve releasing the video — the issue is, once Pence's location is fair game, the govt may have obligation to produce such video)
AUSA Kimberly Paschall says they will go ahead with trial, and if the judge finds they've committed a discovery production violation, they'll address the question of sanctions at a later time, judge says okay
Govt explains last week's production of videos from Matthew Struck, who was w/ Griffin recording video on Jan. 6 and received immunity to testify — AUSA says that in double checking w/ Struck's atty that they had all his videos, they learned there were more and got them last week
AUSA argues they don't think the videos are Brady material (that they're not exculpatory), but they alerted Griffin's lawyer about them because they included Griffin talking about the events of Jan. 6 and his beliefs about VP Pence's location
Griffin's lawyer Nick Smith is back up, argues the govt has breached its discovery obligations re: CCV video of Pence's location that the govt now acknowledges it's relevant given the judge's decision not to restrict questioning about that issue
Smith next argues about a redacted set of emails they recently received re: Secret Service agent who is set to testify; judge has Smith acknowledge that under Jencks, the govt doesn't have to produce that before witness testifies, but Smith says it goes against DOJ policy
Next is Smith's argument against the govt showing a 20-minute montage of footage from Jan. 6 that generally shows the timeline of the breach/violence (not clips specific to Griffin), judge questions if he needs to watch it before ruling
Now Smith is discussing the new cache of footage that the govt received from witness Matthew Struck. McFadden asks if Griffin already had the footage since he'd hired Struck. Smith says Struck was hired by Cowboys for Trump, not to create "cinematic experience" just for Griffin
McFadden asks the AUSA if they plan to use any of the 78 videos that were recently turned over, AUSA says yes, five of them. Judge says it feels a little bit like "sandbagging," given the timing. AUSA insists the exhibit list they gave defense wasn't presented as final
Okay McFadden is ruling on the pretrial issues:
- Won't compel govt to produce CCV video of Pence's location on Jan. 6, but that's separate from question of whether the govt violated its discovery obligation, which isn't being addressed now
- Re: Jencks: Govt has agreed to share unredacted emails related to the Secret Service witness with the defense, so that's moot, judge says he understands defense is frustrated, but doesn't see violation by the govt
- Re: defense motion to exclude montage of Jan. 6 events, judge says he'll consider its relevance after seeing it, since it's a bench trial it's easier for him to deal with it as they go
- Finally, re: defense motion to sanction govt for late produced videos from witness Matthew Struck, McFadden says he'll wait to rule on that until hearing from Struck to better understand his relationship with Griffin and Griffin's access to the footage
Okay, the trial begins. Judge tells govt to call its first witness, Nick Smith asks for a few minutes for an opening statement, judge allows it.

Smith's presentation focuses on what he says are a series of false pieces of info the govt relied on to arrest, charge, detain Griffin
Smith argues the govt won't be able to prove Griffin was within a restricted area that had been clearly marked (what he argues is the standard) or that he was in an area w/ a Secret Service protectee because VP Pence was underground — he was in "a different spatial dimension"
Smith argues the evidence will also show that Griffin believed Pence had already certified the election and was surprised later to learn that Pence had come back to the Capitol. Finally, he argues Griffin's conduct — leading the crowd in prayer — also won't satisfy elements
With that, the government is calling its first witness, Matthew Struck, the person who was with Griffin at the Capitol and was filming; he's received immunity to testify
Matt Struck says he's a self-employed video editor from Colorado, met Couy Griffin around July 4, 2019, they became friends, and he'd film events for Cowboys for Trump; he says he didn't give Griffin footage, he'd post videos he made on Twitter until his account was shut down
AUSA is going to play videos that Struck filmed that are not part of the late-produced batch, so they've been entered without objection from the defense. We can't see them in the media room — hearing some general crowd noise so far, people chanting "decertify"
McFadden asks the govt to replay a clip that the AUSA says shows what the govt contends is a barrier Griffin crossed when he first made entry into the restricted area, judge describes it as a wall (we can't see videos in the media room)
Going up to see if I can get into the courtroom, since it sounds like this is going to be a lot of video, no devices allowed
Back, saw a few of the govt's videos, incl. one where you can see Couy Griffin smiling as he walks up what appeared to be a wooden plank leading to a large open area in front of the Capitol building
Govt also played video of Griffin proceeding up a set of stairs in what I think is the temporary inauguration scaffolding to another platform outside, smiling — the AUSA indicated that's when they believed he was recorded saying "I love the smell of napalm in the air"
There was a video from Jan. 5 of Griffin standing outside the Capitol in a parking lot in front of a black SUV with "C4T" on the side (Struck said it was a rental), talking about praying for Mike Pence, tomorrow being a historic day for the country
McFadden has govt replay a Jan. 7 video — Griffin talks about learning Pence "sold us out" on the walk to the Capitol, saying when DC police told ppl they couldn't go into area set up for inauguration, what did they think would happen, ppl spilled over, became like a Trump rally
In the courtroom, there's a gentleman sitting near the front wearing a black leather vest with "RELEASE THE KRAKEN" on the back along with a picture of said sea monster
Struck testified that after Couy Griffin was released from jail on the Jan. 6 charges, Griffin had asked him for the videos he'd recorded to give them to reporters, and Struck said no. He said he wasn't there working on behalf of Griffin/C4T, wasn't being paid
After a short break, McFadden is back on the bench; right before, he heard arguments on whether to allow the govt to introduce five videos from the late-produced cache the govt got from Struck. AUSA Janani Iyengar says 2/5 would have fallen w/in govt's original request to Struck
McFadden rules govt can introduce the two videos that would have fallen within its original request, but not the other three — says he doesn't think the govt did anything inappropriate, but the orig. video request was "unduly limited" and late production put defense "in a bind"
McFadden says the govt could have learned about these other videos from Struck, who was the govt's witness, through an exercise of due diligence well before the past week
Struck is back and the govt is playing the rest of his videos that they're allowed to introduce from the Capitol, can hear Griffin talking about how what's happening is a "peaceful" assembly but these assemblies will be less and less peaceful if laws aren't followed
Griffin's lawyer Nick Smith is up for cross, is trying to have Struck speak to whether Griffin believed VP Pence had already certified the electoral college results before they arrived at the Capitol, govt objects as hearsay
Smith plays one of the videos and asks Struck if he can hear Griffin say, "he certified it," Struck says he can't really hear that (a defense arg is that Griffin thought Pence's role was over already by the time he got to the Capitol)
Smith is showing more clips, from Jan. 7 and the night of Jan. 6, where Griffin is talking about learning that Pence had certified the election. Govt objects to this as hearsay, Smith argues they're not intro'ing it for truth of statement, but goes to state of mind
McFadden sustains govt objection to Griffin's comments in a video recorded the night of Jan. 6, agreeing w/ the govt its hearsay — Griffin talking about his belief Pence had certified the election in the moment it was all happening was fine re: state of mind, but not later on
Smith asks Struck if law enforcement ever told Griffin not to be a particular place at the Capitol, Struck says no. Smith has Struck walk through a video of them at the Trump rally earlier, when they encountered a Secret Service officer directing people
Smith is having Struck go through videos from the Capitol as Griffin recites a prayer (Struck says the crowd seemed "calmed" and were listening to him), talks about wanting free/legal elections and for his children to have the same opportunities as him
On redirect, re: Smith's arg that Griffin wasn't riling the crowd, AUSA plays video where you can hear Griffin saying things like "people are ready for fair and legal elections or this is what you're going to get and you're going to get more of it" and "we're not going anywhere"
Judge McFadden is back on the bench after the lunch break for part II of Jan. 6 defendant Couy Griffin's one-day bench trial
Griffin's lawyer lodges a complaint that the judge had ordered the govt to turn over a mostly unredacted version of Secret Service emails by the end of lunch, and they just got the docs, McFadden disagrees it's a "sandbag," moves on
The next witness is from US Capitol Police, so the Secret Service agent testimony issue remains as-yet unresolved
USCP Inspector John Erickson, a ~32-year veteran of the force is up, he's the commander of the Senate division
Erickson talks through the security perimeter around the Capitol grounds, how the surveillance camera network operates. On Jan. 6, he was leading the Inaugural Task Force, and wasn't at the building initially but went over around 1:30pm when he heard the breach was happening
On cross-ex, Griffin's lawyer Nick Smith tried to ask Erickson about charging/non-charging decisions related to arrests of people in restricted areas of the Capitol, the govt makes a series of objections to stop that, which the judge sustains
Smith has been walking Erickson through a detailed analysis of images of the area around the Capitol to parse where exactly the "restricted" zones were on Jan. 6, which is relevant to defense case re: when/where/whether Griffin went into it and Pence left it during evacuation
McFadden sounds like he's losing patience with Smith's questioning on this, urges him to get moving
Very short redirect from the govt, confirming the lines of the restricted area around the Capitol in the government's exhibit images, and that the USCP mission is to keep members/staff/visitors safe, and that would have incl. Pence on Jan. 6
After a short break, AUSA Kimberly Paschall (I believe) announces that USCP general counsel Thomas DiBiase *has* gotten approval from the USCP board to share the CCV footage of Pence's Jan. 6 evac with the defense, that's being prepared now
In the meantime, the govt starts to play a video of Griffin speaking after Jan. 6 about his experience, judge suggests he can just read the transcript and that'll save some time
Govt does play one segment of the video where Griffin talks about going to the Capitol, and how there was fencing up and the crowd of Trump supporters pushed through over police warnings that it was reserved for Biden's inauguration, but he says he was in the back
McFadden is now allowing the govt to play a video montage of the official proceedings of Jan. 6, over defense objection that it's getting late and they still to deal with issues re: the Secret Service witness
Final govt witness takes the stand, Secret Service Inspector Lanelle Hawa, 23-year veteran of the force, was with the Liaison Division at the time of Jan. 6, which coordinates visits to the US Capitol for USSS protectees
Hawa was with Pence and his family when he arrived at the Capitol on Jan. 6. They were in his ceremonial office before heading to the Senate chamber and then moved to the House side, then back to the Senate side, for the certification proceedings
Hawa said they were getting reports of people breaking through fencing on the west side of the grounds, Pence moved back to his ceremonial office when there continued to be security breaches, ppl getting through fencing and bikes racks and getting onto inaugural stage
Hawa said it became a security situation even though crowd was outside at that point because people were surrounding a secure site, and it also became an issue when they're potentially taking away options for a route out
Hawa says that after Pence left his ceremonial office, they took him underground to a loading dock area, which the AUSA has Hawa confirm is under a plaza on the Senate side, within the restricted area perimeter the govt laid out
There'd been reporting on Pence's evacuation to an underground loading dock area (newsweek.com/mike-pence-jan…), but this is the first official confirmation from the Secret Service — it's a fact the govt had fought against discussing it on the public record in a Jan. 6 case like this
On cross-ex, Griffin's lawyer Nick Smith is trying to get Hawa to distinguish between how the security perimeter was handled around the Capitol and how the Secret Service typically handles establishing a security perimeter for protectees
Smith asks Hawa if Secret Service set the restricted area on Jan. 6, and when she pauses as she starts to answer, Smith presses her "just tell me," prompting objection from the govt. Hawa says there was a longstanding relationship with USCP and it was known where it would be
Govt has repeatedly objected to this line of questioning, saying they already litigated that USCP and Secret Service worked in tandem on security
Smith asks how people would be made aware of a Secret Service restricted area for a protectee, Hawa says it could be a sign or a verbal warning. Smith asks, what if there's no sign and no verbal warning, Hawa posits that eventually they'd come upon someone who would tell them
Smith asks if Hawa has encountered ppl who entered a restricted area and didn't know it. Govt objects, Smith says govt objections are getting "vexatious," McFadden says he disagrees but will overrule objection. Hawa says she can't recall a situation like that
Smith asks if USCP informed the Secret Service where the security perimeter would be. Hawa hedges a bit, saying she doesn't remember specific conversations, but based on their longstanding relationship, the USSS understands certain boundaries will be established for events
On govt's objection, McFadden cuts off Smith questioning Hawa about whether Secret Service performed adequately/followed policy in moving Pence to the loading dock, judge also cuts off hypo on whether a restricted area could go underground
Tense exchange where govt continues to object to Smith asking Hawa about hypothetical scenarios about how the security perimeter would work if a VP was traveling, Smith says the govt isn't letting him ask questions, McFadden disagrees and dings Smith for talking over him
When Smith tried to ask if a security perimeter would move if a VP left a restricted area, judge again sustained an objection from the govt, saying Hawa testified Pence stayed in the loading dock area for hours and Smith hadn't shown he left the restricted area
This was a significant moment, it appeared to show, at a minimum, that McFadden isn't sold on the defense theory that Pence was no longer in a restricted area once he was evacuated from the Senate chamber/his office to the underground loading dock
After brief redirect from the AUSA, which ends testimony from the Secret Service witness, McFadden calls the lawyers up to the bench for a nonpublic discussion
Clarification: This will not, in fact, be a one-day bench trial. McFadden asks Hawa to be back at 9:30am tomorrow for additional testimony, and then the lawyers will give their closing arguments.

Smith tells the judge he'll be submitting a rule 29 motion for acquittal
And that's a wrap on today's proceedings
On Day 1 of "Cowboys for Trump" leader Couy Griffin's Jan. 6 trial, and how the government was forced to disclose former VP Mike Pence's location that day after unsuccessfully fighting to keep that secret across these cases:
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Tillman

Zoe Tillman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoeTillman

Mar 22
Good morning from the DC federal courthouse, where the 2nd (and final?) day of Cowboys for Trump leader Couy Griffin's bench trial before Judge Trevor McFadden is getting underway.

On everything that went down yesterday:
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
We left off with the govt saying they'd gotten the ok from the Capitol Police board to give the defense CCV video re: Pence's location during the breach. Judge asks if Griffin's lawyer Nicholas Smith wants to recall the Secret Service witness, Smith asks to speak at the bench
Smith says they've agreed with the govt that Pence reached the secure location (the underground loading dock area) at 2:28pm. So that's now an agreed upon fact.

Defense will not present witnesses and Couy Griffin will not be testifying, so they'll move to closing arguments
Read 29 tweets
Mar 17
Hello from Judge Randolph Moss' courtroom (I'm listening remotely) where Jan. 6 defendant Lucas Denney is set to plead guilty to one count of assaulting police after a key missed deadline by the govt jeopardized their ability to pursue a longer list of felonies, incl. conspiracy
What happened was, prosecutors missed the deadline to indict Denney after his arrest, violating his speedy trial rights. In the meantime, the govt did secure an indictment, but for just one charge. They'd wanted the case dismissed w/out prejudice, meaning they could try again
Denney had moved to dismiss the case, but changed course, deciding instead to plead guilty to that single charge in the late indictment — assaulting police w/ a weapon — rather than give the govt another shot at pressing the full set of charges he'd faced at the start
Read 13 tweets
Mar 16
It appears the RNC and the Jan. 6 committee reached an agreement to postpone the enforcement date (until March 30) of a contested subpoena for Salesforce info on donors and others while they litigate the RNC's case ImageImage
A status hearing just started in this case, Judge Timothy Kelly asked if the House would be willing to delay that enforcement date by a week to accomodate the judge's schedule (he says they could expect a ruling by April 6), and GC Doug Letter says they'd be fine with that
Kelly says he's inclined to set a hearing for arguments on April 1, Letter makes the obligatory April Fool's Day joke, chuckles all around
Read 5 tweets
Mar 16
Hello from the DC federal courthouse, where Steve Bannon just arrived for the 11am motion hearing in his contempt of Congress case.

Prev: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
First issue Judge Carl Nichols will hear about is the govt's motion to block Bannon from arguing as a defense that he relied on advice of counsel when he didn't comply with the Jan. 6 committee subpoena to testify
AUSA Amanda Vaughn argues the heart of the contempt charge is "whether or not you showed up" — "The summoned witness doesn’t get to decide if Congress can make them show up."
Read 30 tweets
Mar 15
Jan. 6 defendant Matthew Martin, set for a bench trial on misdemeanor charges before Judge Trevor McFadden on April 5, has asked permission to travel to DC to observe Couy Griffin's bench trial, also before McFadden, set for next week
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2141…
This underscores one of the unusual things about the Jan. 6 cases, where you have a mass of defendants who are being prosecuted/tried individually but the cases also are all related, and they're being handled by a relatively small group of judges
So how each trial plays out is relevant to the entire group, but only to a point, since each defendant brings their own unique set of circumstances into the mix
Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
Hello from Judge Reggie Walton's virtual courtroom, where sentencing is underway for Jan. 6 defendant Jeffrey "Alex" Smith. Govt had asked for 5 mos incarceration for parading plea, arguing his more active role in aiding the mob, confronting police set him apart
Today's hearing is a continuation of a sentencing that started in February — Walton indicated he thought 90 days incarceration + probation would be appropriate, and parties filed briefs on whether split sentences were allowed for petty offenses s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2140…
Given how many Jan. 6 defendants have pleaded to the parading petty offense, the question of split sentences has been an important one as judges figure out what their options are at sentencing and whether they can keep defendants under longer-term probation plus short jail term
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(