Bas Van Hooren Profile picture
Mar 22, 2022 11 tweets 6 min read Read on X
New FREE paper in which we compare #hamstring fascicle behavior and muscle forces between the Nordic hamstring exercise, Roman chair and deadlift

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sm…

More info, images & videos in thread ⬇️

@kenneth_meijer @BeBiomech @SamVanRossom @NMS_UM @HumanMoveSci_UM
@kenneth_meijer @BeBiomech @SamVanRossom @NMS_UM @HumanMoveSci_UM Low strength and short fascicles are risk factors for hamstring injuries. These risk factors can be modified using many different exercises.

However, which exercise is most effective to specifically modify selected risk factors?
We sought to answer this question in this study by comparing the single-leg deadlift (DL; left) Nordic hamstring curl (NHC; middle), and single-leg roman chair hold (RCH; right). Image
We used #ultrasound to investigate biceps femoris fascicle length changes, and 3D motion capture (@Vicon) with EMG (@delsysinc) to investigate muscle forces and activation for each individual hamstring muscle + some other muscles (@OpenSimSU) low quality GIF below
Our most important findings are that the NHC exhibits more fascicle lengthening & a higher velocity compared to the DL and RCH (third row in image below). Interestingly, the NHC was however largely isometric with most fascicle lengthening (~82%) occurring after the break-point Image
The NHC may therefore be most effective to promote increases in fascicle length, but only when it is accompanied with a rapid free fall that induces large amounts of fascicle lengthening (e.g. weighted NHC). This suggestion is also supported by some longitudinal studies.
The NHC generally had the highest peak hamstring forces (fourth row in image). However, peak hamstring forces for the biceps femoris long head & semimembranosus in the NHC lasted only short compared to the DL and were also associated with a strong reduction in muscle activation Image
While the NHC may be effective to promote biceps femoris short head and semitendinosus strength adaptations, the RCH and DL may be more effective to promote strength increases in the biceps femoris long head and semimembranosus. This is also supported by some longitudinal studies
Another important finding is that peak hamstring forces were sometimes higher than forces reported in sprinting.
While findings of higher muscle activation during sprinting compared to (heavy) resistance training exercises are often used to imply that resistance training exercises cannot achieve the same loading as sprinting, our findings therefore this can be done
Finally, we extensively validated our findings by comparing estimated fiber length changes to ultrasound-based fascicle length changes, using EMG, and using a different set-up for the NHC Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bas Van Hooren

Bas Van Hooren Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BasVanHooren

Oct 8
New review where we discuss whether resistance training (RT) helps or hinders performance in speed and endurance sports?

We discuss how certain RT adaptations might boost but also impair performance!

Free full-text:

Short thread with figures below link.springer.com/article/10.100…Image
@TonyBlazevich @SportsMedicineJ @NMS_UM @ALTIS @FransBoschBook @PfaffSC @StuartMcMillan1 @stevemagness @HumanMoveSci_UM @KenClarkSpeed While RT is often used for improving maximal strength and muscle mass based on the adage that “one can’t go wrong getting strong”, our findings suggest that certain adaptations could potentially limit sprint and endurance capabilities if not carefully programmed.
@TonyBlazevich @SportsMedicineJ @NMS_UM @ALTIS @FransBoschBook @PfaffSC @StuartMcMillan1 @stevemagness @HumanMoveSci_UM @KenClarkSpeed First, why this paper?

Some athletes and coaches use RT under the assumption that continued increments in strength or mass will lead to improved performance.

In contrast, others employ minimal or no RT under the assumption that RT may impair endurance or sprint performances.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 7
What is the most efficient way to run according to science?

Find our in our new super comprehensive FREE review with meta-analysis:

Key findings in the fig below, but many more details & applications in the paper

Short thread below

#running #science link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Image
Why this review?

Studies examining associations between running technique and running economy (RE) report inconsistent findings.

Here, we determine associations between running technique and RE in 51 studies (1115 runners)! and explore potential causes of inconsistency. Image
Some key findings:

Most spatiotemporal outcomes showed trivial and non-significant associations with RE:
contact time r = -0.02;
flight time r = 0.11;
stride time r = 0.01;
duty factor r = -0.06;
stride length r = 0.12,
swing time r = 0.12.

Figs below is for contact time Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(