Russia announced today that starting immediately, they will begin selling natural gas to ‘unfriendly countries’ in Rubles. This is a far bigger development than is being reported. 🧵
Russia currently supplies about 40% of Europe’s natural gas, which is used to heat homes and power their grid. Current EU sanctions against Russia have conveniently excluded nat gas for this reason.
There is no way for Europe to cut off such a significant portion of their own gas supply and not cause complete chaos. Even if the US and other countries swoop in to frantically try and make up the shortfall, the infrastructure to switch to LNG isn’t yet built.
The EU could maybe limp their way through the rest of this cold season, but by next fall they’ll be unable to heat their homes or power their grid. So they need Russian nat gas for the foreseeable future.
But given that the EU’s sanctions place them firmly within the ‘unfriendly’ camp, they are now faced with needing to procure Rubles to be able to purchase Russian nat gas. But how do they procure Rubles?
The EU have 4 options: 1. exchange gold for Rubles with Russia. 2. sell goods to Russia. 3. exchange Euros for Rubles on forex market 4. buy Rubles from Russia’s central bank with Euros/USD.
1 gold is sanction proof.
2 is impossible without lifting sanctions.
3 will cause the Ruble to appreciate against the €, something the US is vehemently fighting against.
4 Russia may not accept USD/€ given the ways their holdings could (and would) be weaponized against them.
If 4 occurs, this will force unfriendly countries to first purchase an intermediary currency, like the Yuan. The prospect of being forced into purchasing Yuan is something the west has been anticipating but has little defence against.
And this is the reason behind the recent barely veiled threats and gunboat style diplomacy from the US toward China for helping Russia skirt their unilateral sanctions. This bifurcation of the world into "with us or against us" is setting the stage for renewed sanctions on China.
The resulting prices on not just gas, but on all imported commodities in the EU are set to skyrocket. This is going to cause massive instability, which the US eagerly hopes to exploit.
Thus, we see that this entire conflict is arguably less about the west isolating Russia and more about cleaving a receding Europe off of Asia and forcing it back into dependency on the US.
The EU now has a choice to make: if they continue down the path of subordinating to US aggression against Russia, Europe will be plunged into chaos.
But if they break from the US, they have a chance at a soft landing. So far, they seem to be veering decisively toward the former.
Zooming out further, this conflict is a direct result of a declining rate of profit and the increased difficulty the core is having in imperializing the periphery, which is why we’re seeing the core begin the process of eating itself.
The US is using tariffs to force Canada and Mexico into stopping alleged cross border flows of fentanyl.
One view is that this signals the US genuinely wants to protect its population from fentanyl.
But another is that the US wants to become the global supplier of fentanyl. 🧵
After the US invaded Afghanistan in 2001, Afghanistan’s poppy fields went from a minor portion of global opium production to supplying the vast majority of the world’s consumption.
When the US finally left in mid 2021 and the Taliban retook control, opium production plummeted.
But while opium requires copious labor and vast fields of poppies to generate a significant yield, enough synthetic opioids to supply entire countries can be produced in a single lab by a few chemists.
It’d be hard to imagine a better drug for raising dark money.
I’m sorry, but positing that Trump is some rogue agent acting in brash opposition to imperial interests is swallowing the kayfabe almost as hard as his fans.
When faced with the demands of a hostile US, what are “allies” going to do? Say no and join the global south? Be serious.
The rise of Trump and Trumpism cannot be fully explained without first recognizing how, over the last two decades, American politics has been shaped by the rise of China. 🧵
Despite both parties preferring to deemphasize foreign policy in their campaigns, US foreign policy is the engine driving domestic policy. This is because modern US domestic politics is fundamentally a game of dividing up the plunder that foreign policy secures.
This plunder arrives in the form of persistent federal govt budget deficits which are maintained via the exorbitant privilege of the US dollar’s position as global reserve currency, an arrangement forced upon the rest of the globe in the ashes of the world wars of last century.
US-backed attempts at foreign destabilization always try to leverage *real* grievances, not to bring any resolution to the aggrieved. Quite the opposite, they attempt to intensify.
The only correct position for the western left to take is to oppose *ALL* forms of intervention.