I thought I knew the story of the "lost world" off the east coast of Britain, inhabited by Mesolithic people until rising sea waters engulfed it around 8,000 years ago...
What follows is my imperfect grasp of things. Imperfect because I'm just an enthusiast who likes science - and also imperfect because, excitingly, *the work is happening right now*, in one of the greatest prehistoric archaeological investigations in history.
2/
One September night in 1931, the British vessel Colinda hauled up its nets 25 miles off the Norfolk coast - and found something beautiful & deadly.
Embedded in a lump of peat was this 8.5 inch prehistoric harpoon, carved from bone or antler...
3/
The harpoon was radiocarbon dated in 1988 to around 11,950–11,300 BC.
Pollen from samples dredged up by the same trawler suggested ancient mixed woodland.
At one time, there was land down there - and it seemed to be inhabited.
Doggerland must have seemed like a paradise compared to the starker uplands: food from the coast, food from rivers, deer, wild boar, berries, birds, otters, beavers...
Sure, the sea seemed to be creeping inland a bit more ever year, but hey - let future folk sort it out!
10/
Generation after generation, Doggerland was nibbled away by the rising North Sea.
Did Mesolithic people have stories about times when life was easier? Who knows.
But there certainly wasn't any ignoring what happened next.
And for many Mesolithic people, I'm sure it was.
15/
Eventually the floodwaters receded. This wasn't rapid sea-level rise. What really did in Doggerland was the creep of climate change - and it took thousands of years.
But if you were living here at this time, the tsunami must have been horrifying beyond belief. Words fail.
16/
Now Doggerland is faced with a different threat: the race for clean energy (newly accelerated by certain geopolitical factors).
Necessary and important work! Bring it on. But - do it *carefully*:
And of course, this story is timely in ways it really shouldn't be. As we look back, we're also looking forward - to one of the great global challenges of the 21st Century & beyond.
And if this whole flooded-archaeology thing makes your heart beat faster, please enjoy this taster on the lost (but perhaps *just* about to be rediscovered) medieval port of Ravenser Odd, courtesy of @FlorenceHRScott:
On the 21st July 1976, NASA released the very first colour image taken by the Viking 1 lander from the surface of Mars.
And....wait, what?
The Martian sky is BLUE?
1/
This is obviously not what anyone was expecting. Mars is...
Well, you can see it for yourself on a clear night, with your naked eye. It's noticeably red - about as red as Betelgeuse, tenth-brightest star in our night sky.
No blue. So - what? WHAT?
2/
The Martian atmosphere just isn't thick enough to be blue - just 600 pascals, vs the Earth's 101,000.
That scene in "The Martian" where the rocket's in danger of being blown over? No, sir. Not enough punch to it: space.com/30663-the-mart…
You know the BEST thing about ancient history? All that pristine grey-white stone! SO CLASSY AND REGAL.
Look at this gorgeously monochrome scene from 'Gladiator'. Just look at how *right* it looks.
Yeah. Except - no. Get ready for a shock.
1/
In the middle of the Parthenon in Athens, the ancient Greek sculptor Phidias (480 – 430 BC) built a gigantic statue of Athena Parthenosos, about 11 metres high.
Alas, nothing remains of it today. But there are enough accounts of its construction to make a replica...
2/
...so someone did that: sculptor Alan Le Quire, in (of all places) Nashville.
Not quite what you were expecting, mayhaps?
Well, it was built around a core of cypress wood, and then panelled with gold and ivory plates. That's the description. That's what they did.
When my Zanclean Megaflood thread went nuts in February, some folk said "look into a thing called Atlantropa! It's just as mindblowing!"
They weren't wrong. And now I can't get *this* story out my head either.
So, once more, here we go.
1/
It's 1928.
This is German architect Herman Sörgel. Horrified by the First World War, keen to see everyone put down their weapons & actually, properly work together for a change, he's just had a idea that would solve *everything*.
He's going to drain the Mediterranean.
2/
No, really. It's simple!
All it would take is a series of dams:
- Across the Gibraltar Strait
- Across the Dardanelles to hold back the Black Sea
- Between Sicily and Tunisia, road-linking Europe & Africa
- At the Suez Canal.
There's a vast patch of seagrass off the coast of Australia (3 x the size of Manhattan) - and now genetic testing has discovered it's a *single plant* around 4,500 years old:
OK, I lied. It's only really here can you walk along it: the Þingvellir National Park, where, geologically speaking, North America & Europe are slowly drifting apart.
Enjoy the sunshine! There's none where we're going.
2/
If we went southeast into the water, it gets deep really quickly - maybe 2,000 metres, same as the Black Sea. About the depth of a Russian battleship.
*cough*
But we're following the Mid-Atlantic Ridge - so southwest it is.
Off of the news that Twitter is banning advertisements that contradict the scientific consensus on climate change (washingtonpost.com/technology/202…) and the inevitable kerfuffle, a distinction worth noting:
Denialism is not the same as healthy, questioning criticism. Not at all.
1/
This gets incredibly complicated and tangled, but - whenever something is contradicting the consensus with *absolute certainty*, it's probably bullshit. Utter certainty is the smoking gun there.
No curiosity, no interested questions, no willingness to be proven wrong.
2/
I guess it's the effect of "one man against the world" narratives, but - the thing about the consensus is it's where basically the weight of all the evidence is.
To overturn one, you need to try to overturn the other. If you're not, while claiming utter certainty?