Thread: While you were laughing at Putin for his JK Rowling schtick yesterday, he wasn't trolling you or trying to distract us with cancel culture arguments. He was laying out visions of a West trying to destroy history & Russia itself.
Here's what he said - and why it matters:
First, the context: Putin was speaking to the winners of the year’s Presidential Young Artists award. These sorts of awards are huge in Russia – I studied music at the Petersburg Conservatory, and winning this sort of thing was a big deal. Everybody wanted to win these things.
That’s important. In the speech, which was quite lengthy, Putin was addressing eager young Russian minds - the nation's next musical and artistic stars - not talking to the West.
Putin began by describing Russia as “multinational.” But he immediately went on to praise the “generations” of Russian artists who’ve created a “uniquely Russian” cultural tradition. So no room there for the 20% of the population who are not ethnic Russians.
Putin claimed Russian culture has always been about the “internal world” of the individual: “We feel with acuity injustice and others’ pain…and we go to the aid of those who are in true need of our help.” (Brutal, right?)
“Patriotic culture,” says Putin, “has always defended Russia’s uniqueness.” Culture, he says, “is keeping the Russian nation safe today…when seemingly age-old norms are being undermined in various countries, where history is distorted & the laws of nature are being smashed.”
He then rails against Hollywood films that depict the US as the victor over Nazism in WW2 (an old favourite) and complains that, even in Japan, nobody ever shows who dropped the atomic bombs (utter tripe, of course).
That leads him into Rowling: he’s talking to young people who might be keen Harry Potter fans, and telling them that the West is ready to destroy the things that they love; he’s wrapping the destruction of “innocent” culture into the destruction of Russia itself.
So all the Rowling stuff is in line with the approach Putin has been taking for the last week or two: Russia is under attack at home and abroad; only culture, commerce, and mindset that are sufficiently patriotic and Russian nature can save you.
All the social media reaction yesterday - "He's trying to distract us by bringing up Rowling so we argue while he does bad things!!" - was bunkum. If there's one thing you need to learn from the last month, it's this: take Putin at his word. When he says something, he means it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 Another bizarre piece from Simon Jenkins in the Guardian. This time, he lays into the idea that Russia is any threat at all to Western Europe then, bizarrely, implies that Putin has had no hand in choosing his aggressive path. Let’s take it apart.
First, Jenkins brings up “Godwin’s Law,” which is, frankly, a terrible argument. It’s a gambit used to lazily dismiss serious arguments about the nature of the past or dictatorships (see also: anyone who says fascism cannot exist today).
Jenkins then brings up two disastrously weak and ill-informed claims in one line, which is good going even by his standards:
Here's what a Russian attack on the UK looks like:
- Cyber attacks target healthcare, banking, energy. They look like they come from criminal gangs, not the Kremlin.
- Moscow funnels money to criminals in the UK to commit arson, larceny, and violence.
- Now the nasty bit...
- ...UK is in low-level chaos. Government not sure if/how to respond.
- A series of bombs go off in UK cities, killing dozens.
- Russia buzzes UK air and naval space with planes and boats. Is this enough for the UK to act?
- London does not confront Russia.
- More bombs go off in cities.
- The country is worried & the economy is tanking. The energy grid is buckling. Banks are beginning to creak.
- A bomb on a UK commercial airplane explodes, killing every passenger on board.
My new article on how deranged Russian nationalists were engaging in memory warfare online before the state got involved is out today! Here’s how grassroots myth-making around WWII shaped narratives that appear in Putin's propaganda now. 🧵
I looked at an online hub of nationalist, alt-history sci-fi back in the 2010s. Members co-wrote and self-published wacky time-travel tales set during pivotal moments in history. They're obviously all shit and unreadable, but... sciendo.com/article/10.247…
They were absolutely obsessed with Stalingrad, which they saw as a mythic moment of annihilation & resurrection. Their heroes, emasculated men from the present, fought Nazis, space lizards, and—importantly—nasty, nasty Americans to make "new" Stalingrads.
🧵 Let's take these absurd claims apart 1 more time:
"It started in 2014 with the Ukraine coup and the counter-coup."
- Not a coup. A largely peaceful protest, which was supported nationwide, ended when the Ukrainian President ordered protesters killed then fled the country.
“RT’s efforts include…recruiting Western political commentators and influencers, including Canadians, with the goal of leveraging them to produce and disseminate content that would reduce Western public & political support for Ukraine.”
Independent filmmakers do not simply rock up in occupied Ukraine to spend months filming Russian troops “unauthorized.”
25 years of the Putin regime and still people do not get that there is no freedom of speech in Russia. There is no journalistic establishment. There is no spirit of open inquiry. There is just the state and state control.
Maybe it’s a brilliant film. I don’t know. I haven’t seen it. But it’s been made in collaboration with the Russian state. Inexcusable that Canadian organizations should be funding it.