Now that I'm here at the #ISA2022 I'm in the mood to have a brief thread on what it was like to do security studies in political science in the 1990s...
It is difficult to believe now but it really was the case in the 1990s that the subdiscipline of International Relations in Political Science determined that security studies were no longer a thing, basically because there weren't going to be any wars anymore.
This is what graduate students at my undergraduate institution told me. This is what faculty at my undergraduate institution told me. "Nobody cares about that anymore" is a quote that I have held dear for a great many years.
Security related work had to be framed either around paradigm wars or fitted into some other area of study; international organization, for example.
When I got to graduate school I was more or less the only security studies student; one guy from a previous cohort had studied security but he dropped out to become a tech mogul (didn't work out).
Fortunately my program did have a faculty member who was a kind of security specialist, although not really in what we might term "hard" security studies. And we later added another faculty member who very much did specialize in security, so things were more or less okay.
But the graduate students were absolutely not interested in security work. Some formulation of "nobody cares because there are no more wars" was spoken dozens of times. This despite the fact that the US literally fought a war in 1999.
This wasn't *just* a case of something new taking over from something old; there was the distinct feel (rarely voiced but definitely there) that security studies were somehow "dirty."
Folks didn't quite say it out loud but everyone knew that the people who studied war were the ones who actually liked war and thought war was cool. And those people were bad.
There was also some bitterness about the way in which funding was distributed during the Cold War, where security topics enjoyed an advantage over other fields of study. War as a phenomenon ended and now was the time to take sweet, sweet mental revenge.
Anyway this moment didn't actually last all that long. The Indian and Pakistani nuclear tests had an effect, as did Kosovo. And of course 9/11 Changed Everything and it was once again ok to study war.
Still... it's an interesting moment in the history of the academy. In the end it didn't really affect my career very much, but I suppose if the world hadn't started going to shit before I graduated it might have been hard to find a job.
So when anyone tries to tell you that academia isn't "trendy" (and a few people still try to pretend), best not to pay much attention.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And here is some discussion of the training associated with those upgrades, which took weeks and was not conducted simultaneously for all pilots... flightglobal.com/picture-polish…
@CherylRofer@dhnexon Most peace terms floated thus far have involved three elements; some kind of recognition of Crimea annexation, some kind of recognition of Donbas independence, some kind of armed neutrality for Ukraine.
@CherylRofer@dhnexon There's lots of space to negotiate on all three of those, but the first two are in some ways a lot more tractable than the third.
Gonna try to thread the needle on this Polish MiG thing...
The first thing to appreciate is that when the idea was first floated last week it was absolutely insane, and everyone with any kind of knowledge of the field knew it was insane. Didn't stop us from writing about it...
... because of course the whole "let's invade Ukraine at the start of mud season" is also insane and here we are. But every responsible analysis indicated:
a) there would be problems with pilot training
b) there would be problems with maintainers
...
...
c) there would be problems backfilling aircraft to whichever country transferred the MiGs
d) there would be problems pilot training in the backfilled aircraft
e) there would be neutrality problems
f) a few MiGs are going to have much less military impact than SAMs.
...
So I may have seen one too many “isn’t it shocking this morning that all of last week’s pandemic experts have suddenly become experts on Russia” tweets…
There are countervailing temptations in academia... one leads to the kind of specialization and compartmentalization that results in a scholar of civil-military relations in France 1793-1797 inclusive to decline comment on Napoleon because "it's out of my area of expertise."
On the other hand “I can comment authoritatively on contemporary Gabonese mineral extraction processes because I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night and also I have a Ph.D in medieval Scandinavian literature” does have some downsides.
For some reason I am watching a David Gilmour concert in which he is concentrating heavily on his solo stuff and yet I still have not the faintest inclination to switch over to the SOTU.
And to be honest I don't mind David Gilmour's solo work? I think there's an argument that his solo work is better than the work that he captained in the post-Waters Pink Floyd albums.
I did not realize that Mr. Gilmour was proficient on the saxophone.