TLDR:
Determine the time it takes for the CO2 concentration in EMPTY classroom to decline from 1200 ppm to 800 ppm:
Good: Less than 9 minutes
Bad: More than 30 minutes
In between: Meh…. better get filtering
/1
As I discussed in a previous LONG thread there are three ways to use CO2 to assess ventilation in a classroom.
1)Rebreathed Fraction
2)Maximum CO2 concentration in an occupied classroom
3)Decay rate of CO2 concentration in an EMPTY classroom
This thread will focus on the last method: the decay rate approach. Specifically, this approach can be complex to implement especially at a large scale if you try to fit the data to curve.
/3
This thread presents an easier, direct approach to estimate CO2 decay rates and FIND THE POORLY VENTILATED CLASSROOMS.
/4
But let’s start with a little math...
WAIT! Don’t leave just yet. I promise you will only need subtraction at the end.
/5
We can perform a mass balance to predict how CO2 concentrations decay. A mass balance is just a way of counting.
/6
For instance, the easiest way to determine the number of people who are in a mall at any point in time is to count who enters and leaves starting at the beginning of the day. This is a mass balance. We can do the same thing for CO2 in a classroom.
/7
A mass balance on CO2 in the classroom includes the CO2 that is emitted into the room from people, CO2 that is exits the room from ventilation, and what enters the room from outside.
/8
Don’t leave yet! It will be easy, I promise.
/9
Since we care only about when the classroom is empty in this approach, we can eliminate the “people” term.
/10
(For those that care the Greek letter lambda is the decay rate, t is time, E is emission rate, V is room volume, Co is outside concentration, Ct=0 is concentration at the beginning of the decay).
/11
Now we can use this equation to graph the CO2 concentration decay for various decay rates. You can see smaller decay rates result in longer times for the CO2 to decay from 1200 ppm to 800 ppm.
/12
We can quantify the time it takes to CO2 decay from 1200 ppm to 800 ppm. In this case it is 7 minutes (blue arrow) for a decay rate of 6/h and 22 minutes for 2/h (orange arrow). It doesn’t matter what the maximum concentration in the room is.
/13
You just find time it takes for the CO2 concentration to decay from 1200 ppm to 800 ppm (when the classroom is empty!).
(I told you the math was only subtraction!)
/14
We can plot the concentration relationship between the CO2 decay rate and the time required to reduce the concentration from 1200 ppm to 800 ppm (decay time). Here you can see if you have a decay time of less than 9 minutes, you likely have a decay rate above 5/h.
/15
If you have decay time greater than 30 minutes, then the classroom likely will have a decay rate less than 1.5/h.
/16
(Note: If your classroom didn’t reach 1200 ppm, the times to decay from 1000 ppm to 700 ppm are almost the same as 1200 ppm to 800 ppm).
/17
So this can be a tool to quicky find classrooms that have poor ventilation. If the empty 1200 ppm to 800 ppm decay time is greater than 30 minutes, you don’t have to do any other data analysis. FIX THE CLASSROOM VENTILATION!
/18
(Check the occupancy and room usage, check the ventilation system, etc.)
Okay here come the caveats:
/19
1) Analysis assumes an outside concentration of 420 ppm. 2) You need to record data on a time resolution that allows you to get a reasonable estimation of the decay time (e.g. 1-2 minutes). 3) The classroom must be empty of all CO2 sources (people, Bunsen burners, etc.).
/20
4) I have only mentioned CO2 decay rate, not air change rates. CO2 decay rates are equivalent to air change rates for portable classrooms where all walls are outside walls.
/21
4 continued) CO2 decay rates in classrooms that share inside walls are estimates of air change rates due to air entering from hallways and adjoining classrooms.
/22
5) Mechanical ventilation rates in schools can change after students have left. Decay rates over night may not be representative of decay rates during occupancy.
/23
6) Decay rates are dependent on upon HVAC operation and weather. Check the decay rate under varying seasons, temperature and wind conditions.
/24
Are you still here?
Cool! CO2 is fun for you!
/25
Why did I choose 1200 ppm and 800 ppm? Many classrooms have maximum concentration above 1200 ppm on a regular basis, classrooms that have maximum concentrations below that are typically not the bad ventilation classrooms.
/26
800 ppm was chosen as a lower limit as the closer you get to the outside concentration, the greater the influence of variations in the outside concentrations impact the decay times (among other issues). This is a limit that is also derived from years of analyzing CO2 data.
/27
Bottom line:
You can use CO2 decay times (1200 ppm to 800 ppm) in EMPTY classrooms to find poorly ventilated rooms. If the decay takes longer than 30 minutes you have a problem. Stop playing with the data and START FIXING THE VENTILATION!
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is amazing. Real time CO2 and PM2.5 data for every school and classroom that ANYBODY can view in REALTIME. You can track your own kids class! So much awesome data. Bravo for tranparancy. This is what we should be doing everywhere.
The next step will be tracking absences, test scores and teacher turnover and see how they correlate to peak concentrations. I can't believe they can now do this at a CLASSROOM level district wide! Incredible.
And now that school is in session we can start to see the classrooms with elevated CO2.
Two schools that are 1/2 mile from each other. One class with concerning CO2 values after just `~2 hours (>2500 ppm). And one with decent CO2 (only 840 ppm).
1) You want to seal the box as well as possible so all flow goes through the filter and not through gaps/holes. If tape comes off the corners filtration effectiveness will go down. 2) Avoid accidently putting any fingers through filters (holes). Easy to do at the edges.
FLOW:
1) You want to run the filter on as high of setting as the occupants noise tolerance will allow. 2) Adding a circular shroud to box fans will increase total airflow (preventing air from going backwards through the fan in the corners).
Let's start by clarifying this thread will be about mechanical filtration where the particles are removed via a physical process.
This thread is not about filtration technologies that rely on energy or chemical reactions to remove particles.
2/18
FIT:
Air must go through the filter to be effective. Whether on your face (N95s) or in a duct (MERV13) if there is a bad fit a majority of the air will not go through the filter.
Just like water finding the easiest path down hill,
3/18
#HBA2021. @anna_s_young. Sampled 231 office workers with wrist silicon wrist bands (only worn at the office) in US, UK, India and China. Analyzed for SVOC in 100 wrist bands by Heather Stapleton's group.
Exposure to chemical classes varied by location.
US workers exposed to PCBs that were banned 40 years ago. Exposures to PCBs in India higher. Paint likely a PCB source.
Brominated flame retardant higher in US and UK compared it China and India. People still exposed to flame retardants that have been banned over 10 years.