The Biden White House refuses to specify which type of "Switchblade" drone it's providing Ukraine.

If it's the 300 model, it will be strategically irrelevant.

If it's the 600 model, it's a nightmare for Russian armored divisions. 🧵 Image
The switchblades are often called "loitering munitions."

That's just a fancy euphemism for "kamikaze drones."

They stay in the air for extended periods of time, until they ID a target and crash into it with an explosive charge.
The difference between the Switchblade 300 and 600 models is size, range, and lethality.

As this @AFP infographic illustrates, the Switchblade 600 is a much larger, heavier system capable of disabling enemy tanks from standoff range. Image
The White House has only said it is sending 100 Switchblades to Ukraine, without specifying which model.

It's possible that a mixture of 300s and 600s is being sent.

But if so, it isn't clear why that information would be withheld .
There's two major possibilities.

First, the U.S. may only be sending Switchblade 300s, but it doesn't want to publicly reveal that it's failing to deliver more capable weapons.
Second, the U.S. may actually be sending Switchblade 600s, but it thinks the move will be less escalatory if it's not fully announced.

In other words, the Biden White House may fear Russia escalating use of its own strategic weapons in response to the Switchblade deliveries.
Neither of these rationales are particularly flattering for the White House.

If it's only delivering Switchblade 300s to Ukraine, it's not fighting the proxy war effectively.

And if it thinks Russia won't react to a covert delivery of Switchblade 600s, it's dead wrong.
Conclusion: It's not entirely clear what U.S. policy really is on kamikaze drones to Ukraine.

But whatever we're doing, it doesn't quite make sense.

Which is... pretty typical for this White House.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Clint Ehrlich

Clint Ehrlich Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClintEhrlich

Mar 28
🚨The Ukrainian military is violating the Geneva Conventions.

They're using civilian DHL trucks to attack Russian forces.

That is textbook "perfidy" – prohibited by Article 37 of First Protocol Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. 🧵
This is the text of the prohibition.

Perfidy is defined as an act that:

(1) invites the adversary to believe he must provide protection under international law

and

(2) intentionally uses that false belief against the adversary.
There can be no doubt that Ukrainian forces are guilty of this crime by using DHL trucks to stage mortar attacks against Russian forces.

Specifically, the Geneva Conventions prohibit "the feigning of civilian, non-combatant status."

That is what Ukraine is doing.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 19
🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: Russia has fired hypersonic Kinzhal ("dagger") missiles in Ukraine.

Officially, the weapons were used to destroy a munitions depot in Ivano-Frankivsk.

In reality, this is a MAJOR deterrent signal to NATO. 🧵 Image
There is no plausible reason that the Kinzhal would need to be deployed against Ukraine, given that its air defenses have already been suppressed.

It is Russia's single most advanced conventional weapon – 13 times as fast as a tomahawk, with 3x the payload. Image
Russia's use of the Kinzhal in Ukraine is similar to Trump's use of the MOAB (Mother of All Bombs) in Afghanistan in 2017.

In both instances, the point of the weapons deployment was not the immediate combat effect.

The goal is to menace other adversaries by demoing a system. Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 9
🚨 Russia is escalating its controversial claims about U.S. bioweapons in Ukraine.

Today, a member of the Academy of Military Sciences -- Alexander Bartosh -- claimed America was developing *gene weapons* in Ukraine targeting Slavs. 🚨
To be clear, I am NOT endorsing the theory that America was developing gene-weapons in Ukraine.

I am *reporting* on this messaging from Russia's national-security establishment.

What Bartosh says is believed by the Russian public, and affects their support for the war.
Bartosh claims that it's not a coincidence the U.S. was performing anti-slavic gene-weapons development in Ukraine.

He says the laboratories need to be located close to the targets of the gene weapons to replicate the necessary environmental and demographic conditions.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 8
🚨Congress is debating an EMP first strike to disable Russian planes.

They're calling it a "non-kinetic no-fly zone."

Here's a better name: "WW3."
This proposal is so insane that it would be funny, if there weren't lawmakers pushing it.

To ground Russian jets with an EMP, you'd need to detonate a nuclear warhead.

The "non-kinetic" option is literally a nuclear first strike.
The claim that "sonar" could be used to ground Russian fighters is... incomprehensible?

It uses sound waves to detect objects underwater.

It doesn't magically stop planes from taking off.

Even our best electronic-warfare systems don't have that capability.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 8
The West thinks sanctions are hurting Putin.

They have it backwards: His power inside Russia is surging.

A thread on what analysts are getting so wrong. 🧵
Objectively, Putin's poll numbers have improved since the lead-up to and onset of the war.

This was predictable – a "rally 'round the flag" effect is common for wartime president.

In less than 2 weeks, his approval rating spiked 10 points – from 61% to 71%.
Many in the West are predicting that this effect will be short lived.

Analysts think that Russians will sour on Putin if the economic situation in the country continues to worsen.

But there's a gaping hole in their theory: Russians don't think the war was Putin's fault.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 7
The torture videos of Maxim Ryndovskiy have revealed that few people understand how falsification works.

Karl Popper must be rolling over in his grave, hearing much of the debate on Twitter. 🧵
To falsify the videos, you'd need to show tattoos he had before that *aren't* in the videos.

That would be strong evidence, since tattoos are rarely removed.

Nobody has done that. There are no missing tattoos.
What people have done is post undated photos, where he had fewer tattoos.

They then argue that the torture victim in the video can't be Mr. Ryndovskiy, since he had "extra tattoos."

Seriously? You're not aware that people can, and often do, get more tattoos over time?
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(