🧵The TOGETHER trial purports to show that Ivermectin doesn't provide any benefit. It's given top billing in the NEJM and is now splashed everywhere on the medical news. It's a completely awful study that should not have passed review. nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.105…
/2 The 1st and most damaging issue that the trial was conducted in an area where IVM use was already exceptionally high. They **DID NOT EXCLUDE** for prior IVM use. Only "known hypersensitivity" to tested drugs. Case closed. This trial cannot deliver interpretable results.
/3a
The randomization of the TOGETHER trial was **NOT RANDOM.**
The trial protocol states: "Participants are randomly assigned with equal allocation (...) Allocation of participants to treatment arms is uniform across all concurrent interventions as well as placebo."
/3b
Did the TOGETHER randomization process equally and randomly assign patients to various arms in equal measures at equal times?
No. Case closed. This trial didn't even follow its own protocols.
/4
Finally, as an obvious nail in the coffin, if patients were randomly assigned, and the placebo was inert, and they had no reason to suspect they weren't getting the treatment they wished, there wouldn't be this ENORMOUS drop-out gap with only 40% adhering to placebo (WTF?):
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/2 @K_Sheldrick also failed in comprehending the CITRIS-ALI study by claiming "all other studies failed to replicate" the Marik study. Lol. FAIL. In fact it showed that people with sepsis given Vit-C (1) spent less time in hospital, (2) went to the ICU and Died less often.
/3 There's a crew that runs around attempting to "debunk" what they consider bad science (which I am normally very much in favor of) but when they fail themselves, they never self-correct, and their biases are as obvious as a bad toupee.
/2 naturally the response from the ridiculously self-absorbed US financial system caretakers will be to force prices of everything in exactly the wrong directions. Because that's how they roll. It won't last. Total headfake.
/3 My advice? You should get up to speed on the petrodollar. @ttmygh has generously made this incredible podcast freely available PLEASE LISTEN TO THE WHOLE THING:
The @CDCgov hid data so your tiny little heads wouldn't be confused and think for itself any inappropriate thoughts. Similarly, @federalreserve and the PPT poured huge amounts of high-levered bets into the ""markets"" to assure they "sent the right signals," and ⬆️⬆️wealth gap.
/2 these ""market"" rescues couldn't be more obvious. They operate with ruler precision. They too have the underlying presumption that markets/data can't be allowed to roam freely. They must be controlled. Because the little people cannot be trusted to interpret reality.
/3 Every major institution is like this now. No, you cannot see the NIH's internal communications around the WIV. No, the stock market cannot operate freely. No, the CDC won't give you the V-safe data. No, the FDA won't release the trial safety data.
The price of gasoline is not a function of "values." It's a function of unrestrained currency printing by the Fed and fiscal recklessness combined with a profound failure to invest in new oil production. Unless bad policies and worse decisions are "values." #GaslitNation
Is this why Macron, Draghi, and Trudeau are so panicked by the unvaccinated? Is it because they are actually *more* protected from #omicron than even the triple jabbed? Why does this prospect terrify them so much? It shouldn't, but clearly does. Their anger gives them away.