Carole Cadwalladr Profile picture
Mar 31, 2022 20 tweets 4 min read Read on X
One month before Russia invaded Ukraine, I stood trial at the High Court. And now I wait, in purgatory, to be judged.

But I believe this trial and the silence around it - & all the Kremlin's men - has revealed something profoundly rotten at the heart of the British state.
1/
The case rests on a single question: was it in the public interest for me, a journalist, to speak about a years-long investigation into Russian interference?

That's what the High Court heard, in a £2m trial against a single journalist, on eve of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
2/
And the trial, itself, revealed new details of the relationship between the Russian govt & Brexit's biggest funder.

Details that went entirely unreported.

Besides Guardian, there was not a peep from a single mainstream outlet.
3/
One month later, Putin's slaughter began. Finally, the British political establishment began to wake from its coma.

Britain has an oligarch problem. Overnight we recognised this. Even Andrew Neil noticed this. Noticed the son of a KGB colonel has 2 newspapers & a peerage.
4/
But 2 months on, still no-one speaks of "Arron" & "Banks".

Even as Russian soldiers bomb & rape & Farage spouts crap about NATO across GB News.

The entire LeaveEU-Brexit Party-pro-Kremlin axis of influence continues with no questions asked or answered.
5/
And the silence that enveloped my trial, that still envelops my trial & shrouds these men betrays something other than lack of journalistic curiosity.

The man who funded Brexit believes Ukraine is to Russia as Isle of Wight is to Britain. Who wouldn't be curious about that?
6/
Which is why I think this silence is actually about power.
A confluence of aligned & overlapping interests with a dash of misogyny. It's only Codswallop. And she probably deserved it.

But at the heart of it all is the cancer that is Brexit.

Britain's untreatable tumour.
7/
Because this silence goes deep. And it goes high.

Forget the oligarchs. It's these men & their associates who spout the Kremlin's lines who helped Boris Johnson to power. Who helped deliver Brexit & then, in a pact with the Brexit Party, his GE 19 win.
8/
Oligarchs are one thing. But the Kremlin's influence on our politics is still dismissed as a "hoax" a "Remoaner's fantasy".

Johnson refuses to investigate. And he & his fellow travellers still control the r/w press. While BBC has a hollow vacuum where its balls should be.
9/
The silence is political. It's ideological. It's based on ignorance of facts & denial of geopolitical reality.

And in the case of my trial, it's inflected by a misogynist media campaign that's been so overwhelming, so successful, it's actually invisible.
10/
My 3 days under oath was the most silencing experience of my adult life. The most powerless. My cross-examination the most brutal & aggressive my solicitor said he'd ever seen.

A cross-examination so extreme it included an attempted sexual shaming.
11/
It felt like abuse. Because it was. With the entire machinery of the British legal establishment colluding in that abuse.
12/
Though it's the silence since that's been even harder to bear.

The silence of the entire British political & media establishment.
13/
Because we can all see who Putin is now. But all the Kremlin's men? They're still operating with impunity.

To be clear, there's nothing libellous in saying this. In my case, it was "common ground" that the claimant holds pro-Kremlin views. His side accepted this.
14/
These tactics of aggression & intimidation & deliberate psychological gaslighting that white is black & black is white...there's a pattern.

And just as Ukrainians know that there's no giving into a bully. They also know that no-one is coming to save them.
15/
They've had to learn to fight for themselves. And not to labour it, but I too desperately hoped for NATO jets that never came.

My dirty secret is the guilt & rage & shame I have about how much it's affected me when people are fleeing with their lives in just a plastic bag.
16/
But, it's the silence that's unmoored me. Here in Twitter's shadowlands, all this is known. And out there in the "real" world, it's not. In the Britain of high streets & tabloids & talk shows, the same old white men provide air cover for the same old white men.
17/
Here on Twitter, Farage isn't given a platform. He's given a grilling. Here we maintain an archive of all the things these grifters ever said. Here, where Russian wages its hybrid warfare, we see what's in plain sight. We don't just recognise hybrid warfare, we wage our own.
18/
While the political establishment has never looked so ignorant, so antiquated. Ch4 employing Andrew Neil as its hot new presenter. BBC's Laura K interviewing Farage to "make sense" of the nation.

Not enough lolz for either of these. Meanwhile: not a single question is asked.
19/
So, sorry. A long thread that's mostly trying to explain to myself why I've found this trial & then its silence so intensely dislocating.

I think I'm in a dissociative state. But what I've finally figured out is that Britain is too.

FIN.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carole Cadwalladr

Carole Cadwalladr Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @carolecadwalla

May 23, 2023
NEW: I'm seeking permission to appeal in the Supreme Court. There's no meaningful free expression in this country if after proving your speech is lawful, you're hit with £££ costs: a devastating ruling that will chill public interest journalism
by @_EmmaGH
theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/m…
This was filed today in the Court of Appeal. If the Supreme Court rejects it, we believe there’s a strong case to take it to the European Court of Human Rights. ImageImageImageImage
Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights puts an obligation on states to ensure freedom of expression. According to the ruling in this case, it's very far from free: even if you can prove your speech is lawful, it'll still cost you hundreds of thousands of pounds...
Read 5 tweets
Feb 28, 2023
The Court of Appeal has ruled.

I've won on 2 of 3 important grounds of principle.

Most importantly, the landmark public interest ruling is intact. The judge's findings of fact are intact. The original judgment holds.

The court found in favour of Banks on a single point
1/
It has ruled that after the NCA concluded its investigation in April 2020, the continued publication of the TED talk caused him serious harm

Only guess what? That 'continued publication' has nothing to do with me! I'm not the publisher. And the court even *acknowledges* this.
2/
The judgment clearly underlines *exactly* why this is a SLAPP. Why didn't Banks sue TED? Or @ObserverUK which first published the words?

And now I've been held *personally* liable for a video published by media org in a foreign jurisdiction protected by the first amendment
3/
Read 8 tweets
Jan 22, 2023
It's been a long time but v happy to be back in @ObserverUK today with 2 pieces, both close to my heart. And to launch a new project with @allthecitizens.

1/ An astonishing new claim that MI5 refused to investigate Russian spy's infiltration of Tory party
theguardian.com/politics/2023/…
2/ Delighted to profile the fierce & brilliant @pevchikh for @ObsNewReview. If you've seen the Navalny doc, she's the woman sitting by Navalny's side as he calls one of his FSB poisoners & gets him to confess to Novichoking his underpants.
theguardian.com/world/2023/jan…
3/ Finally, the story of how the Kremlin captured Britain. And how the UK government covered it up. If you've wondered why no British broadcaster has told the real story behind the Russia Report, please watch this & consider contributing.

Read 5 tweets
Jul 17, 2022
My jaw hit the floor when I discovered Boris Johnson left an emergency NATO meeting after the Kremlin’s chemical warfare attack on Britain & flew to an off-the-books meeting with an ex-KGB spy.

Yours should too.

This is how it happened.
1/

theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
In July 2019, Johnson had just been made PM. And @nickhopkinsnews published 2 extraordinary stories about Foreign Secretary Johnson flying from a NATO meeting to a party in Italy at the height of the Skripal crisis.

2/
theguardian.com/politics/2019/…
The party was at Evgeny Lebedev’s villa. The owner of Independent & Evening Standard.

Hopkins’s first story suggested he’d given his security detail the slip to fly to Italy. Then a Guardian reader supplied photos of him leaving: hungover & dishevelled
3/ Image
Read 17 tweets
Jun 19, 2022
It did almost crush me.

The only reason it didn't is because of my amazing lawyers & the generosity of 28,887 people.

But here's what you don't know. The judgment is *extraordinary*. 117 pages of FACTS.

About Russia, Brexit & the man who funded it.
1/
theguardian.com/uk-news/commen…
I was blown away when I read it.

To judge the case on public interest, Mrs Justice Steyn first had to judge if Arron Banks had - as I alleged - lied.

To do so, she examined his relationship with the Russian govt in forensic detail.

We now have this all on public record.
2/
This is what I claimed was the key lie.

The public statement Arron Banks made on the day the Electoral Commission opened its investigation into his Brexit donation.

He said his "sole involvement with 'the Russians' was a boozy 6 hour lunch".

I said this was a lie.
3/
Read 14 tweets
Jun 13, 2022
It hasn’t sunk in yet but…SOME NEWS.

I am so profoundly grateful & relieved.

Thank you to the judge, my stellar legal team & the 29,000 people who contributed to my legal defence fund. I literally couldn’t have done it without you 🙏🙏🙏

theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/j…
I haven't read the judgment yet but what I can say that the last 3 years have been extraordinarily difficult. Fighting this has been a crushing, debilitating, all-consuming experience that I sincerely hope no other journalist ever has to go through.
2/
judiciary.uk/judgments/bank…
The fact that his case was brought clearly shows how our libel laws favour the rich & powerful. I was only able to defend myself because of the incredibly generous support of the public. But this judgment is a huge victory for public interest journalism.
3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(