My new book, Banning Transgender Conversion Practices: A Legal and Policy Analysis (UBC Press) is officially out today. Tragically, it couldn’t be more timely with yesterday’s news that the UK wouldn’t protect trans people from the torturous practices.
When I began writing this book nearly five years ago, I thought that conversion practices were on a path to extinction, and that my work would merely help finish the job. I am disturbed by how wrong I was—trans conversion practices are on the rise.
Trans visibility hasn’t helped—the fact that the UK government threw trans people under the bus on #TDoV is a bitter reminder of that. The backlash against trans rights has been severe, and the inclusion of trans people under the bans is increasingly challenged.
But do not be mistaken; resistance to including trans people is also an excuse to weaken, delay, and abandon bans on practices targeting sexual orientation as well. Trans people are canaries in the coal mine—a familiar refrain.
My book, with a brilliant cover by @catgraffam, was honed in the fires of advocacy. It began in academic research, true, but its published form is rooted in my work with legislatures in and outside Canada alongside @NoConversionCA and the awe-inspiring @icequeenerika.
My book considers critical questions for clinicians, scholars, lawmakers, and advocates alike. What is the scope of bans? How do they differ across jurisdictions? What are their pros and cons? How can we do better?
My research shows why existing bans haven’t been working, and forges a path forward. A path towards clear, detailed, and effective legislation rather than mere puffery. With this goal in mind, I offer a carefully annotated model law to inspire legislators going forward.
The book is not only the first to focus on conversion practices targeting transgender people, but also the first to approach conversion practices from a legal standpoint. It sets the stage and agenda for both of these discussion, a role I take immensely seriously.
My work owes immensely to survivors, from whom I have drawn inspiration, knowledge, and motivation. Without them there would be no book. My hope is for to do them justice, and support them in their ongoing work against conversion practices. You deserve to be valued as you are.
I also want to thank all those who supported me in this project. Thank you to the team at UBC Press for their marvellous and tireless work. Thank you @LTempo3 and @dykelaw for being family.
An immense thanks to @victor_madrigal for your encouragements and touching foreword. I also want to thank you for your fantastic report on so-called ‘conversion therapy’ to the UN Human Rights Council, which cites an early version of this manuscript.
To journalists, policymakers, and advocates, I welcome you to contact me if you want an expert perspective on conversion practices, how they impact trans and queer people, and how to best fight them. This book is only the beginning of the work. There is still so much to do.
While legal and policy work gets unavoidably dense at times, I have worked hard to make the book as accessible as possible with the help of lay readers. My hope is for the book to be readable by most members of trans communities.
For those interested in acquiring the book, there are many places you can turn to. Only the hardback version is available in print as of now, with the more affordable paperback version coming at the end of the year. Electronic versions should become available shortly.
In Canada, you can get the book directly from UBC Press:
It is also available on Amazon. Amazon is a fraught source because the company is immensely unethical, yet Amazon reviews and rankings really drive sales.
You can also get it from Amazon with the same addenda as above. For the US, you’ll have to wait until May to get it from Amazon but can pre-order it now.
As retailers receive deliveries, it may also start popping up in various large bookstores and websites. Hopefully you’ll be able to find yourself a copy!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our new study reveals that 42% of conversion practices targeting gender identity or expression are performed on non-trans individuals. By excluding trans people from their proposed ban, the UK government is harming everyone.
Conversion practices are routinely done on cisgender kids because they’re gender non-conforming, in the hope that it will prevent them from becoming trans. If they become gender conforming & heterosexual, that’s just the cherry on top.
Experts have been telling this to the UK government all along, but they aren’t listening. They’re too busy trying to protect and legitimate conversion practices on trans communities. A fire they try to stoke at every opportunity.
We found that trans people were far more likely to experience conversion practices. But because they are a larger group, nearly 42% of those who experienced practices targeting gender identity or expression were cisgender.
The data confirms that excluding gender identity and expression from laws, as the UK proposes, poses a severe risk to cisgender LGBQ individuals as well.
As those who oppose gender-affirming care continue to parrot ‘most children desist’ despite ‘desistance’ studies having been debunked, new research continues to show that nearly all (97.6%) trans youth continued to identify as trans.
To add more precision, the percentage who continued to identify as trans may be even higher since the percentage is for those who (1) were still trans, (2) maintained social transition, and (3) maintained medical transition.
The study has many flaws, including deploying cisnormative and transnormative understandings of transitude and gender-affirming care. Yet the data is nevertheless informative, adding to the growing literature debunking the claim that as many as 80% of trans youth ‘desist’.
When transfeminine people talk about how some people in trans communities perpetuate oppressive attitudes towards them, they’ll sometimes get accused of being enbyphobic and told that erasure and misgendering isn’t a privilege.
And it’s true. Being erased and misgendered isn’t a privilege. Trading one oppression for another isn’t a privilege; it’s not like being cisgender where you simply take out that axis of oppression. But that doesn’t mean we can’t meaningfully draw comparisons.
I am non-binary and usually assumed to be a cisgender woman (or sometimes trans). I also have a long and ongoing history—though it used to be far worse—of experiencing transmisogyny.
I get annoyed when I see people talking about destroying all gender and how bad it is to be “binary,” and then notice they’re largely conforming to their AGAB, aren’t read as trans, and likely face little transphobia.
Stop shitting on trans men and women. They’re challenging cisnormativity far more than you. Hating on them because being non-binary is more “enlightened” is just a shit take.
For those who want to reply that this doesn’t happen or that I just hate non-binary people: (1) very ‘not all X’ vibes; (2) the fact that so many people who experience transmisogyny are in the comments saying they’ve faced it suggests that there’s a perception issue.