"There should be some magical form of energy that has zero impacts and until we get there, we should just keep using fossil fuels." This is just the latest variant on climate denial zombie argument #4, "the cure is worse than the disease". theguardian.com/environment/20…
(Of course there's no free energy lunch: there is a very expensive one that will cost us human civilization as we know it, and a much more affordable on that will preserve human civilization but of course we need to keep working at making even more affordable than it is today.)
I've never met a climate denial argument that wasn't a variant of one of these five categories, all aimed at preventing action: 1/ It's not real 2/ It's not us 3/ It's not bad 4/ We can't fix it (and here's why) 5/ It's too late
There are significant improvements to be made in clean energy. It must be even more efficient & affordable; we must recycle batteries, turbine blades & panels; and we must prevent the massive human rights violations & local env pollution caused by mining. snopes.com/fact-check/ele…
However, fossil fuel extraction also causes enormous local pollution and creates systems of oppression and human rights violations. Here's one example, in Colombia. theguardian.com/environment/cl…
Here's another example; the health impacts of mountaintop removal coal mining in the US Appalachians include increased risks of cancer, chronic heart, lung & kidney disease, and more. science.org/doi/full/10.11…
A third example: the health impacts of fracking, which occurs primarily across Pennsylvania, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Arkansas as well as Canada and China. ehn.org/health-impacts…
And a fourth and final example, the health impacts and environmental devastation of oil and gas extraction in the Niger Delta. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
As @DrBobBullard, father of environmental justice, says: "Fossil fuel use has brought us to the brink of climate catastrophe. Cleaning up our energy is the only way out. This is a huge technological & policy challenge but also an urgent justice challenge." linkedin.com/pulse/why-ener…
PS. And don't forget this. Air pollution from burning fossil fuels is responsible for over 8M premature deaths every year. seas.harvard.edu/news/2021/02/d…
In which yet another leading scientist has to spend his time debunking ongoing zombie myths perpetuated by non-experts in their ongoing attempt to continue to delay climate action by using denial strategy #3, "it's not bad". The full list of strategies is ...
1/ It's not happening 2/ It's not human-caused 3/ It's not bad 4/ It's too expensive/hard to fix; better/cheaper to adapt 5/ It's too late, you really should have warned us earlier
There are many variants, but in my experience they all fall into one of those 5 categories.
Often, people are encouraged when the rhetoric from politicians or other prominent folks who reject the science moves from category 1 to 2 or 3: but I'm not. Why not? Because the purpose of each category of action is identical: to prevent and delay climate action.
"The real lesson from the battlefields of Ukraine is that Britain [fill in your country's name here] needs to rid itself of its fossil fuel addiction entirely and become self-reliant on electricity that is generated cleanly and efficiently."theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Talking to an expert who studies the oil & gas economy the other day, he told me that a country can never be energy independent while depending on fossil fuels, even if their production = consumption, since they are still tied to OPEC and the global market.
As @NRDC's @johnbowman argues here, "Clean energy doesn’t mean the end of geopolitics. [But when our source is clean energy], we reduce our reliance on nations that use energy as a weapon. We make our economy stronger and our country more secure." nrdc.org/experts/john-b…
Two reasons why today's news is one piece of buckshot but no silver bullet for the climate crisis: 1. From "proof of concept" to demo plant to global implementation takes decades. 2. Only 25% of GHG emissions come from electricity & heat production. theguardian.com/environment/20…
As @ProjectDrawdown shows, there is no single silver bullet. Instead, there's a plethora of "silver buckshot" solutions, from modifying human behaviour to efficiency to smart ag & land mgmt to bleeding-edge new tech like fusion. We need them ALL. drawdown.org
There is no magic deadline to tackle the climate crisis... no hard and fast "8 years until it's too late" finish line. Instead, this is what the science says: every year matters. We can't afford to wait; we must act now.
The responses to this tweet display many of the fallacies we fall into when we don't apply critical thinking. "My family didn't get asthma so these results are false" or, "I love gas, so you're wrong," or "Where did the data come from?" (they didn't read the article).
People also point out, correctly, that this is a first-world issue. In low-income countries, women & children are often disproportionately exposed to deadly indoor air pollution as they cook over an open fire. That's why efforts like this are essential. cleancooking.org
And many here in TX shared that their gas stove was the only way they could keep warm or cook during the big freeze last Feb. That's why we need *system* soln's: a clean, safe grid AND electric cooking/heating. There's no silver bullet; we need it all. thehill.com/opinion/energy…
In the US, 70% of people are worried about climate change but only 8% are activated. Sowing uncertainty is a technique that's been used for decades to keep that gap as big as possible: "if we aren't 100% sure, best to wait." Here's the most recent example. desmog.com/2022/01/28/jor…
It's important to recognize that science denial is just a smokescreen. No one really questions 200 years of physics: if they did, they wouldn't be using stoves, fridges or airplanes either. The real problem is solution aversion. Watch:
That's why, when we talk about climate, we can briefly address science-y sounding arguments (no, it's not the sun) but must immediately pivot in the same breath to climate solutions (did you know there's more jobs in solar than coal? or that 90% of new power in 2020 was clean?)
"I chose this life to help build a better world for you. Climate is changing so fast, and will affect your world so much, I’ve had to become your ‘gladiator science’ mama so I can fight every day – for you.” @DeepBlueSeaNextcsmonitor.com/Environment/20…
And if you're not a parent, of course you have every reason to care about climate, too! It's not a zero sum game: we need everyone to lean into whatever their passion is & show others who care about the same thing that they're also the perfect person to act on climate.
As I say in my book, Saving Us, ... "Whoever you are, you are the perfect person to talk about climate change with others who share your interests and values." simonandschuster.com/books/Saving-U…