It’s remarkable how many of the people who profess to be comfortable not only with Zara’s plight but also with their own impoverishment boast about supporting Brexit in their biographies. ‘Patriotism’ that doesn’t extend to concern for actual people is a bleak and ugly spectacle.
The majority of people who explained to me yesterday that they couldn’t afford to heat their homes *before* price hikes were pensioners. A breast cancer patient in Sheffield who explained that no matter how many layers they wear, the air her & her 86yo husband breathe remains…
freezing. A man in Evesham who puts the heating on for one hour every evening and sits with his wife under a blanket for hours. The mystery of how this can happen is solved when these stories go ‘viral’ & Tory voters queue up to reminisce fondly about deprivation & poverty…
I know why they do it. I know why they insist that there is no *real* suffering & that people should just cancel their Netflix or eat fewer takeaways. It is the same toxic appetite fed by tabloid claims that all unemployed people had ‘flat screen TV’s’ or that refugees must be…
frauds because they have ‘smartphones’. Some of the callousness is genuine, rooted in unhappiness & shame, in a warped belief that their own misery can be assuaged by hurting others. Some of it is self-protection, a desperate attempt to pretend that such horrors only happen to…
people who have somehow brought it on themselves through ‘lifestyle choices’ or fecklessness. And others are just ignorant, hateful wankers. It’s hard to tell the difference but I’m increasingly comfortable with the idea that the massive majority are in the final category…
Especially the ones in the media.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD Because I think this might be important. @NadineDorries is the Secretary of State for Culture, *Media* & Sport. She is seeking to introduce legislation designed to address online abuse. In this clip, @MrJohnNicolson reminds her of abuse she has directed at me on here. 1/
Specifically, she called me a "public school, posh boy fuckwit". Two points: I attended the same public school as her own daughters (!) & I would currently fall foul of Ofcom regulations if I repeated this abuse verbatim on my radio show. But much more importantly... 2/
Having laughed (alone) at the evidence of her own engagement in online abuse, she goes on to suggest that: "That comment may have been as a result - if you’d like to look at Mr O’Brien’s tweets - at some of the appalling things that as a woman are directed towards me online." 3/
To save you from wondering: the latest Duncan Smith WW2 nonsense is of a piece with the now almost entirely deranged Mail On Sunday’s front page. Their story is that the Kabul withdrawal (described in triumphant terms in Johnson’s speech last week, remember)… 1/3
…was a catastrophe because some civil servants were working from home. It is mentioned in passing quite far down the story that Dominic Raab, the politician ostensibly in charge of the matter, was on holiday at the time. So, to recap: the government wants you to believe… 2/3
…that the Kabul withdrawal was a triumph *and* a disaster; that the disaster was caused more by civil servants working at home than the Foreign Secretary being on holiday & that all this means *you* should stop working from home regardless of what you or your employer may want.
New book out on Thursday. It’s very different from my last one & intensely personal. Instead of explaining how other people end up believing untrue things, I dig deep into the early life experiences that led to me being wrong about a whole heap of things. A (very long) thread:
Two years ago today, in the midst of an awful family crisis, I started therapy after finally admitting that I wasn’t providing people I love with the help & support they needed. I did it more in desperation than in hope but scepticism soon gave way to a life-changing experience.
I learned that due mostly to some grim (but not paedophilic) experiences at my boarding schools, I’d spent most of my life in a state of almost permanent high alert. Attributes I’d always thought of as strengths - ‘resilience’ & a refusal ever to admit vulnerability or pain -
1) Pretend that idiots wishing harm on PM are representative of all govt. critics. (Ignore all examples of harm being wished on govt. critics.)
2) Orchestrate pliant MPs & client journalists in ‘quote tweet’ pile-ons against the most effective criticism.
3) Insist that the govt. has ‘followed the science’ without explaining what science.
4) If pushed on 3, argue that explaining the science will ‘embarrass our allies’.
5) Wibble about ‘national cycles’ when asked why the govt. failed to learn from stark foreign examples.
6) Repeat 5 when asked to explain unflattering comparisons with Germany, Ireland etc
7) Introduce pithy but vacuous slogans into public discourse so that blindly loyal forelock-tuggers at least have something to shout into the ether. See ‘population density’ & ‘herd immunity’.