So much information is pouring out about the plots and schemes of Fauci/Collins/Farrar/Daszak, and with Redfield now talking to reporters, things could get really very interesting. My key question: how is the presumption that the virus came from a lab leak linked to the policy
decision to embrace and push (very hard) lockdowns as a solution, a wildly experimental method of virus control that had a low possibility of success but which produced huge calamities? What was the motivation here and how was that influenced by the coverup?
Further, how and to what extent did the distractions of their priorities influence the gross neglect of therapeutics for actually helping people get well? The period of neglect lasted for months even from the time they knew the virus was already here. At what point in this did
the pharmaceutical companies get involved with a proposed solution and how much was the green light and tremendous funding given to them influenced by fear of mass casualties due to the prospect of a lab leak? At least we know enough to ask the right questions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
