In the end we're just a confused species who entered an awkward phase because our brains evolved too fast. We wound up with the ability to think abstract thoughts but without the wisdom to not identify with them. To invent nuclear weapons but without the wisdom to not build them.
The ability to conquer our ecosystem without the wisdom not to do so. To write vast tomes of philosophy that contain not one line telling us how to feel content on our own home planet. To construct entire belief systems that are utterly useless for living in harmony with what is.
I'm sure birds and whales went through awkward evolutionary transition phases as well. It's just that their transitions didn't involve giant prefrontal cortices in their skulls that make childbirth awkward and could easily give rise to the end of all life on earth.
I do believe we have the ability to make the jump from this awkward transition phase to a truly conscious species. But it looks like if we make it it's going to be by the skin of our omnivore teeth.
The birth of a human baby is difficult due to the size of our enormous, rapidly evolved brains relative to the more slowly evolved pelvic bone. The birth of a sane humanity will be difficult for similar reasons.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's actually really disturbing that US empire managers now feel comfortable just leaking the fact that they are blatantly lying to the public to win a psywar against Putin. It means they can get the public to consciously consent to their rulers lying to them for their own good.
Watch the video clip above. Watch how known CIA asset Ken Dilanian and the host normalize the fact that the US government is funneling lies into the minds of the public and reframe it as something awesome and good. politico.com/blogs/media/20…
The smear campaign against Assange brainwashed liberals into accepting that it's okay for their government to hide secrets about its criminality. Now this is brainwashing them into accepting that it's okay for their government to actively deceive them.
In order to avoid being suspended by @TwitterSupport like @RealScottRitter I would like to declare that Russia is 1000% guilty of war crimes in Bucha, which is a thing I somehow know before The New York Times or the Pentagon or indeed before any investigation at all has occurred.
The agenda to create a one world government is not some hidden conspiracy involving secret societies and shadowy figures with Jewish surnames. The US empire is openly working to unite the planet under a single power structure which effectively functions as a single government.
You don't need to plunge down a bunch of conspiratorial rabbit holes to see this, you just have to watch the news with an understanding of which governments are part of this giant power structure and which ones have refused to be absorbed into it. It explains everything you see.
Every major international news story, underneath all the imperial narrative spin, is nothing other than the story of a giant US-centralized power structure working to incorporate more and more nations under its umbrella and smash any nation which refuses by any means necessary.
This State Department employee has been aggressively campaigning to have me deplatformed or labeled "Russian State Media" because RT has occasionally republished some of my copyright-free blogs for free on their own initiative, and because I say war crime allegations need proof.
To be clear when I say he's a State Department employee, I mean he is literally currently employed by the US State Department. au.linkedin.com/in/robert-pott…
Empire apologists have recently taken to the talking point that going to war with Russia in Ukraine would be fine because it's not "inevitable" that it would lead to nuclear war. As though "Maybe it WOULDN'T kill everyone on earth" is a sufficient argument for doing something.
And during those 70 years the US took great pains to avoid direct hot war with Russia exactly because doing so could lead to nuclear war. Avoiding hot war with Russia *WAS* the policy that prevented nuclear war from happening. It's insane how they're trying to erase this history.
Also, it should really be common sense by now that "Bill Kristol has some great things to say about this" is a strong indication that you're on the exact wrong side of an important foreign policy debate.
Do you truly believe it's a coincidence that mainstream Americans were made to despise Putin with a Trump-Russia collusion narrative that turned out to be pure bullshit in the years preceding an unrelated US proxy war against Putin? What would it mean if it wasn't a coincidence?
I mean, is it not even a tiny bit suspicious that every single part of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative had its origins in the US intelligence cartel? caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/re-visiting-…
And that now we're looking at a proxy war and unprecedented economic war against that same government, which has been long targeted for destruction by that same US intelligence cartel? Even though Russiagate and the Ukraine war theoretically have nothing to do with each other?