In 2019, I was taking my 3 girls somewhere when suddenly in the back seat I heard the middle (8) explaining to the youngest (6) that "some girls are born with a penis." *record scratch* What? They were in public school at the time, so I asked the 8yo where she got this false info
Apparently her class had read "I Am Jazz," over even the teacher's objection & without the parents being notified or informed in any way. One of her classmates was going to be transitioning MtF, & his parents had strong-armed the school into having this book read to the class.
No parents were informed of this foolishness either before or afterwards. The school had brought in consultants on the matter - a self-identified transbian from a local nonprofit who gave what I later found out was a weird/uncomfortable workshop to the staff - w/ no parent input.
There were all kinds of bathroom rules put in place, some small girls were threatened by the staff with trouble if they complained about boys in their bathroom, etc. & so on. All the stuff you know from Libs of Tiktok. It's real & it happens IRL.
The school pushed all this craziness on the staff and students because they were terrified of a lawsuit. Not because was any buy-in on these issues -- there was not -- but out of sheer terror of being sued. The activists have sowed bullying, & they're reaping at the ballot box.
Anyway, back to the incident truck. I had a chat with the kids right then & there about this issue. We had planned to wait to discuss this, but our hand was (rudely) forced. This is how I described my chat with the girls to a mailing list I was on at the time:
Our kids are not at that school anymore, needless to say. But the story in this thread is not unique, nor is it the only such story I have personally. Parents are being blindsided by this stuff, & it's not right. Insofar as the Dems own this, I can't imagine voting for one again.
The sort of coda to all this, at least for me, is that there really is no venue for either public or private dialogue about this issue that is not totally broken. The aforementioned mailing list where I posted that? I left b/c I was threatened & censored for discussing this topic
You literally can't talk about this anywhere, even in a semi-private venue, with people who disagree without it descending into some kind of screaming match. I'm basically resigned to some kind of violence at some point around these things. Hard to see a way forward.
If one party's position is, "any discussion of this issue that takes place on terms that I don't like is literal violence," then they've ruled out all dialogue. What is left if there's no dialogue, then? How do we resolve bitter, existential conflicts without using our words?
Yep. Any political party that owns the position, "don't tell parents what happens at school, & actively mislead them about critical identity issues that have serious, lifelong medical implications for their child," is utterly doomed & I am here for it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with jonstokes.(com|eth)

jonstokes.(com|eth) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonst0kes

Apr 7
Just a reminder for the people on my feed who don't follow this type of thing: when you see news about how good computers are getting at writing computer programs, you should know that this is a Big Freakin' Deal, and in fact is the biggest deal in AI. Why?
She short answer is that when we finally have an AI that can write novel programs better than we can, then we can ask it to write a smarter version of itself. And then we can ask the resulting AI to write a smarter version of itself, & on & on until we have something like a god.
The moment when we invent an AI that can write a smarter version of itself is the "singularity" people are always talking about. (I realize many of my followers will know all this, but I find that many people don't, so it's good to give some context for the headlines.)
Read 9 tweets
Apr 6
What Jane & Julian are both engaged in here is the typical denial that there is any amount of social contagion at work in the uptick in LGBTQ-identifying people. The idea seems to be that sexuality (& lately gender identity) are 100% innate & immutable.
I come at this from a slightly different angle. On sexual orientation, I think the vast majority of kids are born straight, & this makes sense evolutionarily. Some small % of kids are born same-sex attracted. But on top of that, sexuality IS a bit malleable, & can be influenced.
As for sex, it is a binary & there are only two sexes. The idea that intersex ppl invalidate this is sophistry. But gender presentation & all the social stuff layered on top of that? Extremely malleable by all sorts of social forces.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 6
Ok so my recent 2 threads on trans-related stuff have gone viral, so as a Texan I feel I should clarify something by way of weeding out new followers who may be here for a certain kind of thing: I oppose the new TX law where they call CPS on parents. Here is why:
I agree that any form of trans-related medical intervention in minors is child abuse -- puberty blockers, HRT, surgery. But going after parents who are dutifully following the advice of licensed professionals because they're told their kids' lives are at stake? No.
Most of these parents just want to do right by their kids, who are presenting to them as being in severe distress. The parents are being told if they dont buy into all this nonsense, their kids are at extreme risk of death. So going after desperate, confused parents is just cruel
Read 6 tweets
Apr 6
The appeal of “groomer” is IMO really simple & I’m surprised so many are surprised at it catching on. The pattern is:
1. I’m an adult & you’re a small child
2. We talk about sex
3. Your parents don’t need to know about this conversation
4. Eventually you & I will have sex
1-3 are undeniably present in some public schools now. It’s literally adults taking about sexual topics with kids & the parents aren’t in the loop. So if you plan to die in the hill of “yeah but cmon #4 isn’t happening!” then yeah you can do that but yikes?
I’m willing to say that #4-based objections are legit & the term is a stretch because of that, but you gotta admit the fact pattern here is not awesome & it’s way less of a stretch than, say, using “gaslighting” to mean “lying.”
Read 7 tweets
Apr 4
I gotta say a lot of the "Fermi paradox" discussion just doesn't click with me. So when people ask, "so where are they?", I immediately think, "What exactly are you expecting? Some kind of formal visit where they set up an embassy? Or invade? But why?"
Why are "general indifference" or "curiosity & monitoring" not in your list of likely ways spacefaring civilizations could be relating to us. Why would you imagine anything other than weird lights in the sky and maybe the occasional bizarre encounter?
The assumptions behind "so where are they" seem to me to be something like: a peer civilization operating in a environment of scarcity, so that when they encounter us they're forced to make a friend/foe call. But what if we're neither a peer nor is there scarcity in the universe?
Read 5 tweets
Apr 1
On the one hand, I think a lot of people who are using the term "groomer" right now recognize that it's at the very least a cynical stretch -- the virality of a recent thread to this effect attests to that. On the other, the crowd that's most angry about this term...
...has been really free with slandering even the most charitable & empathetic examples of genuine, good-faith disagreement over gender & sexuality issues as "hate" & "violence" that will "literally" get ppl killed.
Given how hysterically over-the-top the rhetoric from the other side is, my main reaction to the "groomer" backlash is some mix of "you started it" & "cry more" & 🤘. I acknowledge that this reaction is not exactly civil, or even mature. But I cop to it b/c I imagine it's common.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(