Republicans could not be clearer about what their goal is: 1950s-style white Christian patriarchal dominance - that’s their animating vision for America. All the racial and social progress towards multiracial, pluralistic democracy since the 1950s needs to go.
 
Some thoughts: 1/
This isn’t just empty rhetoric. We are seeing a wave of red-state legislation intended to eviscerate the civil rights regime that has been established since the 1960s – and banish, outlaw, and censor anything that threatens white Christian dominance, past or present. 2/
Debating whether or not Republicans *really* want to abolish multiracial, pluralistic democracy is pointless. The proof is in the pudding, and the pudding is the state level: Wherever they are in charge, Republicans are openly embracing an authoritarian vision of society. 3/
The reactionary counter-mobilization against democracy is happening on so many fronts simultaneously that it’s easy to lose sight of how things are connected. But they absolutely are connected, and we need to focus on the big picture. 4/
Ban abortion and contraception; criminalize LGBTQ people.
 
Install an authoritarian white nationalist education system, ban dissent.
 
Restrict voting rights, purge election commissions.
 
These are not disparate actions - it’s one political project. 5/
The overriding concern for conservatives is to maintain traditional political, social, cultural, and economic hierarchies. It’s a vision that serves, first and foremost, a wealthy white elite - and all those who cling to traditional white Christian patriarchal authority. 6/
It’s a political project that goes well beyond Congress and state legislatures: This is about restoring and entrenching white Christian patriarchal dominance and authority in the local community, in the public square, in the workplace, in the family. 7/
The American Right is fully committed to this anti-democratic, anti-pluralistic vision – which they understand is a minoritarian project: Conservatives are acutely aware that they don’t have numerical majorities. But they don’t care about democratic legitimacy. 8/
The Republican Party has a comprehensive strategy to put this vision into practice. In Washington, Republican lawmakers are mainly focused on obstructing efforts to safeguard democracy. It’s at the state level where the reactionary assault is accelerating the most. 9/
It all starts with not letting too many of the “wrong” people vote. That’s why Republican lawmakers are introducing bills - have introduced hundreds of bills! - intended to make voting more difficult, and have enacted such laws almost everywhere they are in charge. 10/
All of these voter suppression laws are ostensibly race-neutral and non-partisan – as they always have been in American history. But look at who is targeted by these laws, and who is supposed to benefit: The political project behind them isn’t exactly hard to figure out. 11/
If too many of the “wrong” people are still voting, you make their electoral choices count less. Gerrymandering is one way Republicans are trying to achieve that goal, and it has been accelerating and radicalizing basically wherever they are in charge. 12/
As that might still not be enough to keep the “wrong” people from winning, Republicans are trying to put themselves in a position to nullify their win: We’re seeing election subversion efforts up and down the country – an all-out assault on state election systems. 13/
Republican-led state legislatures are re-writing the rules so that they will have more influence on future elections, election commissions are being purged, local officials are being harassed, people who are a threat to Republican rule are replaced by Trumpist loyalists. 14/
Republicans understand that such blatant undermining of democracy might lead to a mobilization of civil society. That’s why they are criminalizing protests, by defining them as “riots,” and by legally sanctioning physical attacks on “rioters.” 15/
The Right also encourages white militants to use whatever force they please to suppress these “leftwing” protests by celebrating and glorifying those who have engaged in such violent fascistic fantasies – call it the Kyle Rittenhouse dogma. 16/
Finally, Republicans are flanking all this by a broad-scale offensive against everything and everyone criticizing the legitimacy of white nationalist rule – past, present, and future. They clearly understand the importance of being in control of the national story. 17/
Ideally, the Supreme Court would step in and put a stop to the escalating attempts to undermine democracy and roll back civil rights. But the conservative majority on the Court is actually doing the opposite, providing robust cover for the reactionary counter-mobilization. 18/
That’s the white nationalist vision, these are the authoritarian strategies. And this assault on democracy and the civil rights order is escalating. The long-standing anti-democratic tendencies notwithstanding, the Right has been radicalizing significantly. Why now? 19/
The more structural answer is that America has changed, and the conservative political project has come under enormous pressure as a result. The Republican hold on power has become tenuous, certainly on the federal level, and even in some previously “red” states. 20/
The Right is reacting to something real: Due to political, cultural, and most importantly demographic changes, the country has indeed become less white, less conservative, less Christian, more diverse, more multicultural, more liberal. 21/
And recent political and societal events have dramatically heightened the sense of threat on the Right, of being under siege, that has resulted from these changes. The first one was the election – and re-election – of the first Black president to the White House. 22/
Nothing symbolized the threat to white dominance like Barack Obama’s presidency - an outrageous subversion of what reactionaries understand as America’s natural order, made worse by the fact that he managed to get re-elected with less than 40 percent of the white vote. 23/
It’s also impossible to understand the Right’s radicalization without conceptualizing it as a white reactionary counter-mobilization specifically to the anti-racist mobilization of civil society in the summer of 2020. 24/
In the Black Lives Matter-led protests of 2020 that – at least temporarily – were supported by most white liberals, the Right saw irrefutable proof that radically “Un-American” forces of “woke,” leftist extremism were on the rise, hellbent on destroying “real” America. 25/
Since then, by portraying the opponent as a fundamentally illegitimate faction that seeks to destroy the country, conservatives have been giving themselves permission to embrace whatever radical measures are deemed necessary to defeat this “Un-American” enemy. 26/
The white reactionary counter-mobilization against multiracial, pluralistic democracy won’t stop because the people behind it have some sort of epiphany that they shouldn’t go *that* far. It will either *be stopped* or succeed in entrenching white Christian patriarchal rule. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Apr 7
Who’s afraid of KBJ?
 
New episode of @KreuzundFlagge podcast is out - Part 1 (of 2) of the deepest of deep dives into the SC hearings and what they can tell us about the Republican Party, the American Right, and the current political conflict in general. kreuzundflaggepodcast.com/episodes/kbj-p…
In this episode, we spend a full hour on:

- the initial conservative reactions to Biden’s announcement to nominate a Black woman
- the recent history of SC nomination battles, going back to Thurgood Marshall and Abe Fortas in the late 60s
- Robert Bork, the enduring myth of “Borking,” and the importance of conservative self-victimization
- And, of course, the utterly bizarre ways in which Republicans tried to make this all about “Critical Race Theory”…
Read 5 tweets
Apr 5
“Heated exchange”
 
So much wrong with the fact that the Republican Party elevates rightwing extremists like Matt Gaetz to positions of influence. And so much wrong with how the media covers – and provides cover for – his brutally nonsensical propaganda.
Let’s start with what Gaetz is saying: that the U.S. military is weak because it embraces “socialism” and “wokeism.” It’s a claim so bizarre that it doesn’t deserve any real discussion. What is significant, however, is that it’s fully in line with Putin’s critique of the West.
Few on the Right are still openly siding with Russia; most are trying to memory-hole their well-documented admiration for Putin and have seamlessly shifted to some good old saber-rattling while often propagating Russian misinformation at the same time (bio-labs in Ukraine!).
Read 14 tweets
Apr 3
On the Trumpian Right, where all the energy in the Republican Party is, there can be no moderation, no acceptance of democratic political culture. There can only ever be escalation in what they see as a life-and-death struggle against “Un-American” enemies - without and within.
The notion that these people are just cynical opportunists who will say whatever they think gets them elected is dangerously flawed both analytically and political. Analytically, it ignores the fact that ideology always circumscribes and defines the realm of opportunity.
Of course there is a good measure of opportunism involved, but what’s on display here is also a manifestation of deeply held ideological convictions. It’s white nationalist ideology and opportunism reinforcing each other in dangerous ways.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 1
New episode of @KreuzundFlagge podcast is out – a little shorter than usual, focused on answering listener questions. But we are still tackling a bunch of crucial issues regarding the past, present, and future of American democracy, including: kreuzundflaggepodcast.com/episodes/faq-e…
- Where to find the voices of critical observers and analysts who have been consistently right about the nature of the political conflict?

- The reasons why there is so little organized protest from left-wing organizations
- Realistic near- and medium-term scenarios for how the conflict over American democracy might play out

- How to democratize the system, starting with the Supreme Court and the Senate
Read 5 tweets
Mar 31
A little while ago, I criticized the NYT editorial board’s embrace of the idea that “America Has a Free Speech Problem” – and the cover they provided for the reactionary “cancel culture” crusade.
 
I’d like to engage a few reactions that I think are indicative of misconceptions:
There are three common reactions I’d like to address:
 
- “The poll numbers don’t lie!”
 
- “This can’t be about elite white men defending their privilege, because people of all social strata bemoan cancel culture.”
 
- “Just ignore this.”
As an aside: I am not going to talk about the purely bad-faith, obviously disingenuous criticisms like “Oh, so you hate free speech and think public shunning and shaming are always great and never problematic!” No one of any kind of significance is saying that. Stop it.
Read 32 tweets
Mar 26
Exactly this. And what we need from the media is not even necessarily an active commitment to democracy over other forms of government, but a pro-truth, pro-evidence, pro-objectivity bias. What we need is clear, factual coverage of the GOP’s anti-democratic radicalization.
It’s not even necessarily the “I don’t have a horse in this race” attitude that is so disastrous. It’s the complicity in the assault on democracy that results from the norm of valuing “neutrality” over objectivity, producing coverage that privileges the radicalizing Right.
I’d settle for “Republicans want to abolish democracy, Democrats want to preserve it - We don’t care who wins, but here’s what’s up.” The key problem is that too many journalists are actively obscuring what is going on.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(