Our incoming director @Emily_4319 addresses the #EWIPA delegations on the final day of this round of consultations
Underpinning these negotiations is an international acknowledgement that we must move beyond a status quo where 'collateral damage' is an accepted and inevitable consequence of modern conflict, without a critical understanding of what this means for those civilians on the ground.
We have also heard throughout these negotiations a call for a declaration that is “realistic”; But with a lack of a shared mechanism for tracking and monitoring the civilian harm from military action, how can we know what the reality is?
This is a point that the declaration should clearly address. Yet, as emphasized by several others, a commitment to tracking civilian harm is currently missing from the operative section of the text.
Although it is mentioned within the Preamble, there is no explicit requirement for states and their armed forces to track civilian harm in realtime during military operations,to collect data on civilian harm,or systematically to collect information on damage to civilian objects.
As we also heard yesterday, states have pushed for including ever more equivocal language in section 4.2 - this makes it even more critical that states include an additional commitment ...
.. as per Section 3.4 bis to - and we quote - “establish capabilities to track, analyse, respond to and learn from incidents of civilian harm in real-time, including damage to civilian objects.”
Civil society groups such as ours have shown that it is possible to collect this data: and with it, we can demonstrate a clear and compelling link between civilian harm and population density.
For example; a link between incidents of civilian harm and longer term humanitarian needs, and - ultimately - we can use that data to demonstrate a central point –
Adherence to IHL - while critical in minimising civilian casualties - is, in and of itself, not sufficient to mitigate significant civilian harm during urban fighting where wide area effect explosive weapons are being used.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Day 3, the final day, of this round of crucial #EWIPA talks in Geneva.
This thread, updated by our team of @Emily_4319 Megan Karlshoej-Pedersen, @sanjanamv
and @georgiaedwardz will keep you up to date on the final day of these crucial talks.
Our head of research and incoming director @Emily_4319 speaks during the #EWIPA negotiations : "Civilians know when harm takes place and often are able to identify who is the perpetrator of that harm ; they are reporting on it at scale and in real time."
"Ukraine is just one example of how civilians are reporting on and documenting the horrors of war, even as they are living under it."
"To date, our organisation alone has assessed and archived over 100,000 unique local sources across eight conflicts alleging civilian harm resulting from the use of EW, many of which happened in populated areas."
This thread, updated by our team of @Emily_4319 Megan Karlshoej-Pedersen, @sanjanamv and @georgiaedwardz will keep you up to date on the second day of these crucial talks.
The first delegation to speak is the UK, saying, "The UK would like to clarify that there isn’t a general obligation in international law to hold accountable those responsible for violations."
This thread, updated by our team of @Emily_4319 Megan Karlshoej-Pedersen, @sanjanamv and @georgiaedwardz will keep you up to date on the crucial talks
@Emily_4319@sanjanamv@georgiaedwardz Nujeen Mustafa, a Syrian who fled Aleppo after it was largely destroyed by explosive weapons, addresses delegates:
“While you’ve been negotiating whether a declaration should be made, 11,076 people have fallen victim to these weapons" she says
Ukraine is the first nation to speak to the delegations at #EWIPA, saying “Ukraine is on everyone’s mind these days…Entire cites and towns have been turned into ash because of use of explosive weapons in populated areas.”
Ahead of the 20th anniversary of the start of the Forever Wars, Airwars tried to answer one simple question - how many civilians have US strikes killed in 20 years? airwars.org/news-and-inves…
Our research team spent months reviewing every reliable assessment of civilian harm caused by US strikes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen.
Sources of data included @unamanews and the work
of @nickturse and others in Afghanistan, @iraqbodycount in Iraq, @tbij in Yemen and Pakistan, and Airwars' own data in the campaign against ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
Syria: A young child named Osama Adnan Al-Hamid is among those reported killed in a US-led Coalition helicopter attack & airstrikes on the village of Kharbet Al Janous خربة الجاموس according to multiple local sources. The Coalition is claiming no civilians were harmed. More soon
The Coalition spokesman has now issued a series of tweets about the event - conceding the death of a young child, though appearing to blame this on Daesh.
The SDF's own statement suggests that "the body of a murdered child" was found, seemingly following Coalition strikes. However OIR itself says a wounded child was treated by Coalition medics but then died. sdf-press.com/en/2021/07/dis…