American Oversight Profile picture
Apr 8, 2022 21 tweets 9 min read Read on X
One year ago this week, we filed records requests for records related to Arizona’s partisan election “audit.” Now, the Senate is still fighting transparency. But we’ve already uncovered thousands of records that show three key things. Here are a lot of receipts. #FoiaFriday
First, the Trump administration and its intermediaries were involved from the beginning in urging the Arizona Senate to discredit the election results by claiming there was widespread fraud.
On Nov. 14, 2020, Arizona Senate President Karen Fann emailed colleagues and said: “We are working with our Congressmen, State Party, Boards of Supervisors, Trump team etc to either prove or disprove concerns.”
documentcloud.org/documents/2107…
On Dec. 2, Sen. Fann told a constituent she had “spoken with Mayor Giuliani at least 6 times over the past two weeks.” She also mentioned a private meeting with Giuliani and the Trump legal team.
documentcloud.org/documents/2079…
On Dec. 4, Christina Bobb of the right-wing outlet OAN emailed Fann with “affidavits” from Rudy Giuliani alleging fraud.
documentcloud.org/documents/2079…
On Dec. 28, Fann told a constituent she had “been in numerous conversations with Rudy [Giuliani] over the past two weeks trying to get this done. I have the full support of him and a personal call from President Trump thanking us for pushing to prove any fraud.”
Second, hardcore partisans and conspiracists were involved in the planning and execution of the "audit."
We uncovered a Jan. 25 email from conspiracy theorist Jovan Pulitzer, the likely source of the false claim that fraudulent ballots had been shipped in from Asia. The email from Pulitzer appears to be a follow-up from a call with Fann.
Pulitzer outlined what his team would do: “All that my team does is high-speed scan in all ballots in their native state … and allow machines to inspect without bias and produce a report.”
documentcloud.org/documents/2079…
Fann forwarded the email to Sen. Warren Petersen, and Eddie Farnsworth, a former state senator who prior to leaving office in January had issued the original subpoenas to Maricopa County for the ballots and election materials.
On April 6, @protctdemocracy sent a letter to Cyber Ninjas and other contractors, demanding that the groups cease any planned direct outreach to voters, which was mentioned in Cyber Ninjas’ statement of work.
Fann forwarded the letter to Josh Barnett, a candidate for U.S. Congress who has posted frequently about the Q Anon conspiracy theory. “Now I know they are worried,” Fann wrote.
documentcloud.org/documents/2079…
Fann also forwarded to “audit” leaders a Sept. 14 email regarding “7825 dead voters” that the writer claimed were found by Pulitzer.
documentcloud.org/documents/2107…
Finally, by design, the "audit" was crowdsourced and funded through opaque dark money groups.
We obtained an early statement of work dated March 3, which includes a reference to an in-person canvassing operation led by former state legislative candidate Liz Harris and Bobby Piton (now a U.S. Senate candidate in Illinois) as part of the “Electronic Voting System Team.”
This version of the statement of work indicated that funding would be provided by “patriots across the country” who “have desired for this audit to take place and have contributed funds to make that happen and lessen the load on the State of Arizona.”
We uncovered texts between “audit” spokesman Randy Pullen and Trump campaign COO Jeff DeWit. DeWit asked about where to send $175k and Pullen suggested the Guardian Defense Fund.
azmirror.com/blog/a-gop-law…
On July 28, Pullen discussed payments totaling $1 million with Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer who had assisted with Trump’s attempt to overturn the election.
documentcloud.org/documents/2105…
Now, nearly a year after we started our legal fight, we’re still working to uncover the facts about Arizona’s “audit.” americanoversight.org/investigation/…
In February, the Arizona Supreme Court agreed to hear the state Senate’s appeal of lower court rulings rejecting the Senate’s overly broad claim of legislative privilege, which it had attempted to use to justify withholding records.
In May, the Arizona Supreme Court will hear the Senate’s appeal.

Learn more about what we’ve exposed about the sham “audit” by reading our full, detailed report here:
americanoversight.org/how-the-arizon…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with American Oversight

American Oversight Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @weareoversight

Apr 25
We obtained emails between top Trump administration DHS officials and Ginni Thomas, a conservative activist and wife of the Supreme Court justice.

The emails show Thomas sharing election conspiracies in the days before the 2020 election.
americanoversight.org/document/dhs-c…
Screenshot of an email sent by Ginni Thomas. In part, the email reads: "[Redacted] asked me for links we have all been sharing about the coming insurrection, chaos, and violence. It is not random. It appears very organized if you have the eyes to see and read and hear."
On Oct. 28, 2020 — less than a week before the election — Ginni Thomas sent more than a dozen links to a Google Group called “20024.” “[Redacted] asked me for links we have all been sharing about the coming insurrection, chaos, and violence,” she wrote. Screenshot of an email sent by Ginni Thomas.
“It is not random. It appears very organized if you have the eyes to see and read and hear,” she continued. Thomas asked recipients to add more links and to organize the articles.

An individual (name redacted) created a Google document that organized the various links. Screenshot of an email.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 19
The “constitutional sheriffs” movement is a fringe theory that holds that sheriffs have more law enforcement power in their home counties than any other government body or individual. The movement has brought its work to the election denial space.
theguardian.com/us-news/2024/a…
“Nothing is more dangerous to our democracy than a movement based on election lies promoted by radical law enforcement officials who falsely believe they are the ultimate authority, including on matters of election administration,” our Chioma Chukwu told the Guardian.
We’ve been investigating “constitutional sheriffs,” obtaining the schedule and list of participating fellows at the Claremont Institute’s Sheriffs Fellowship — a November 2022 gathering of some of the most controversial sheriffs in the country.
americanoversight.org/investigation/…
Read 4 tweets
Mar 12
It’s #SunshineWeek, a week that celebrates & promotes access to information and open government nationwide.

Today, we’re highlighting the power of #FOIA with a thread about its past, present, and future. We’re highlighting the power of #FOIA with a thread about its past, present, and future.
President Lyndon B. Johnson signed FOIA into law on July 4, 1966. Records show LBJ personally removed strong language supporting open government from the press statement. He only agreed to sign it after DOJ suggested he include a signing statement.
nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/…
President Lyndon B. Johnson signed FOIA into law on July 4, 1966. Records show LBJ personally removed strong language supporting open government from the press statement. He only agreed to sign it after DOJ suggested he include a signing statement.
In his signing statement, LBJ praised the importance of openness for democracy and said the legislation affirmed American principles. But he also wrote that he felt some documents shouldn’t be available to the public.
nsarchive2.gwu.edu//nsa/foia/FOIA…
Read 13 tweets
Jan 10
Yesterday, D.C. Circuit heard oral arguments on presidential immunity in Trump’s election interference case.

Judges questioned both sides about our amicus brief arguing the D.C. Circuit lacks jurisdiction to hear Trump’s appeal on his immunity claims. Here’s what that’s about:
In Trump’s federal election interference case, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled that Trump is not entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution. Trump appealed the ruling, hoping to delay the trial set for March.
Late last month, we filed an amicus brief that argues that the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit lacks jurisdiction to hear Trump’s immunity appeal until after he is tried by a jury, convicted, and sentenced.
americanoversight.org/american-overs…
Read 7 tweets
Jan 4
As we approach the anniversary of Jan. 6, 2021, former President Trump faces criminal charges for attempting to subvert the election. An amicus brief we filed in this case could thwart his effort to delay his trial until after this year’s election.
latimes.com/opinion/story/…
In the election interference case, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled that Trump is not entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution. Trump appealed that ruling, hoping to delay the trial set for March.
Last week, we filed an amicus brief arguing that the D.C. Circuit lacks jurisdiction to hear Trump’s appeal on his immunity claims until after he is tried by a jury, convicted, and sentenced.
americanoversight.org/american-overs…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 15, 2023
For more than a year, we’ve been investigating how the election denial movement led several states to leave ERIC, a nonpartisan organization that helps maintain up-to-date voting lists.

Here’s what our investigation uncovered. #FoiaFriday
americanoversight.org/american-overs…
The same people who tried to overturn the 2020 election worked behind the scenes to influence the ERIC exodus by promoting false claims and conspiracy theories — priming states for post-election chaos that could be used to deny election results in 2024.
americanoversight.org/the-right-wing…
The records we obtained also show that states have scrambled to find viable replacements — none of which provide ERIC’s security, reliability, or effectiveness.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(