After a couple of days of media storm around the tax affairs of Rishi Sunak and his wife, Akshata Murty, on which I have offered an opinion or two, there are still questions to ask, including can Sunak survive? Another thread….
We still do not know the answers to all the questions that arise as a result of this affair, and the emergence Sunak having had a green card in the USA until 2021 and his wife ‘voluntarily’ paying tax certainly complicates things.
Regarding the green card, there are a number of issues. Tax is not one of them. He likely paid more tax as a result. But question as to loyalties do matter and it’s clear a Sunak kept his US residence option open for a year after being Chancellor.
It’s fair to ask in that case to which country his loyalty is due in that case? I’d even ask who he thinks he is acting for? That’s a question that needs answering now. Why is he a politician here if he wanted to live in the US? What’s that really about?
There are also questions of integrity. Holding a Green Card looks pretty incompatible with the oath MPs have to take. And there are also, apparently, questions on whether Sunak broke US law by being a UK politician whilst holding a green card, which seems to be illegal in the US
All these things matter. We need to trust this man’s judgement, honesty and integrity. Can we when he can appear to willingly hold what look to be legally and ethically incompatible positions? That’s a hard ask for any politician to make.
Then there is his wife’s offer to pay tax. My interpretation of Ashtaka Murty’s statement is she’s really changed nothing and remains non-dom but will now say she’s remitted all her worldwide income to the UK on her tax returns and so will pay tax on it here.
However, that ensures that her capital gains can stay out of tax and her estate might well avoid inheritance tax. In addition, we’ve no way of knowing if her income is now in offshore trusts that would then also avoid the UK tax charge.
Worse is the arrogance of this statement. Murty’s one of 0.2% of people in the UK who pay for the right to choose how much tax she pays here. The rest of us do not have that choice. That’s still very definitely one rule for the Chancellor’s wife and another for the rest of us.
All this being noted, and I suspect there is more to come, the politics of this are becoming clearer.
What is the coming very apparent are four things. The first is that both Sunak and his wife have made statements which have been misleading, at best. The most obvious of these was with regard to a claimed relationship between non-domicile and citizenship, when there is none.
The other was a claim between the need to avoid paying tax on worldwide income in the UK and the right to return to India. Again, there was simply no such link.
On both these issues the statements that have been made by Rishi Sunak or spokespeople on his wife’s behalf have not been fair representation of the true situation in the UK, on which point just about every tax commentator in the UK has been agreed.
This might not matter if Sunak was not Chancellor of the Exchequer, but I think we have a reasonable right to expect the Chancellor to get statements about tax right, and to be able to hire suitable advisors if the Treasury can’t help.
If Sunak cannot get issues such as this right, we have a reasonable right to ask whether he can get bigger questions right as well. Politically his failure to attend to detail on this issue, and as a result to issue what appear to be misleading comments, is serious.
Second, it is very clear that Sunak subscribes to the idea of tax mitigation within the limitations of the law is acceptable without apparent consideration of the ethical or political consequences.
In a country where we are dependent upon voluntary compliance with that law, and on most people filing tax returns in good faith and within the spirit of the law, meaning that most do not need their tax affairs investigated as a consequence, this is a dangerous precedent to set.
Third, Sunak’s statements, his green card and his defence of his wife’s tax mitigation and of her claims to not be committed to the UK, all cast doubt upon his own commitment to this country in which he does at present hold the second highest office of state.
Quite reasonably people expect our politicians to adhere to a number of standards. One is to accept the sacrifice that office demands. A second is to put the interest of the country first. Right now it seems that Sunak fails both tests.
Last, the questions that have arisen with regard to Sunak having a green card and for how long he held it opens further issues, not least statements he might have made to tax authorities in one country when a legislator in another.
I am making no suggestion with regard to illegality or dishonesty here, although I am suggesting poor communication needing resolution. What I am questioning is Sunak’s commitment to the UK, his financial ethics, his political ethics and so his suitability to hold high office.
What seems apparent is that at a time of high political stress in the UK Sunak is revealing that he does not have the character, the commitment or the willing to lead the financial management of the government of this country. On all fronts he’s now a loser for the Tories.
So, two questions. First, will he quit? I have a feeling he will. He’s hating being briefed against. He’s unable to understand why it’s happening: the world was meant to love him, he thought. And his wife and her family will hate this too. The chance he’ll just walk seems high.
The alternative? Johnson will ditch him by offering him a much more junior post when he next reshuffles, and then he will walk out of both Cabinet and government.
My thinking is Sunak knows his currency with the only community that matters to him – the wealthy - will be higher if he walks of his own accord. I really can’t rule out that he might.
When seen through the lens of political economy - of which I was a professor for five years - which is all about power relationships, what we can see here is that Sunak's power is ebbing away very fast. When will it run out? Who knows? But it looks like it is heading that way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

Apr 8
I spent yesterday writing about the technicalities of domicile as they might impact Rishi Sunak’s wife. But that’s because her tax decisions cast doubt on his suitability for office. Another thread, this time in the man himself ….
Sunak shot to prominence in 2020 when appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer. Although not quite unknown before then, few had paid him much attention.
Even his appointment as Chancellor looked as much like luck as anything else. He’d managed to be promoted through the ranks of obscure ministers to hold the number 2 position at the Treasury when Sajid Javid resigned. Appointing him saved a reshuffle, so he got the job.
Read 29 tweets
Apr 7
It’s been reported that the Chancellor’s wife, Akshata Murthy, is not tax domiciled in the UK. This has been confirmed by a statement issued on her behalf. But I think the statement of facts issued by her is wrong. And I also suggest HMRC could challenge this claim. A thread….
I need to report what a spokeswoman for Murthy has said, which was: “Akshata Murthy is a citizen of India, the country of her birth and parents’ home. India does not allow its citizens to hold the citizenship of another country simultaneously. (Continues in next tweet)
So, according to British law, Ms Murthy is treated as non-domiciled for UK tax purposes. She has always and will continue to pay UK taxes on all her UK income.” I would have hoped that Ms Murthy could buy advice that was right, but this statement is wrong.
Read 23 tweets
Apr 6
Suppose the viewers of @Channel4 really did not want to watch a Murdoch / Amazon / Netflix / Apple owned channel in the future and decided to do something about it. Suppose they decided to buy it instead…. a thread…..
@Channel4 has been put up for sale by Nadine Dorries. The idea horrifies many. No one but a few dogmatists on the far-right of politics can see a gain from this. They, though, want another platform for their message. Suppose the viewers decided to stop them. Could they?
Clearly they could. At a maximum 7 million people watch @Channel4 (the Bake Off). @Channel4News manages an average of 750,000. Let’s suppose the latter number really care about the future of the Channel.
Read 9 tweets
Apr 3
It would cost around £50 billion to save people from the hunger, the cold, the poverty and the despair they are now facing. That money is available tonight. It would take a few keystrokes on a Bank of England keyboard to create it, instantly. So why won’t the government do it?
I am sure some will say this is just the magic money tree at work. And in the very short term it is, just as was used to get us through Covid. But in this case money creation would save the economy from collapse as the people heading for poverty could continue to spend.
And when you ensure that millions of families can continue to spend what they would otherwise be unable to do then you provide millions of others with the income they need to prevent them going into poverty too. In economics we call this the multiplier effect.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 28
Sunak's claim that he can't afford the cost of more borrowing is fabricated and involves inappropriate accounting for the cost of paying off index-linked bonds maybe many years from now. If inflation falls between now and then, which is likely, the Treasury will get a bonanza
In fact, the Office for Budget Responsibility is forecasting that interest costs will tumble to new record low levels in a couple of years for precisely this reason. Now guess what Sunak will do with the fall in his interest costs at that time?
Will he give a bonus to those he is pushing into poverty now or will he cut taxes for the best off just before an election? I think you know the answer to that. So does he. So don't be fooled by any of his claims as to unaffordability right now. They're fabricated nonsense.
Read 23 tweets
Mar 26
There is a growing and numbing realisation of just how bad Sunak's budget really was. Worse, he’s even now saying that there is nothing he can do about poverty. This is a long thread to explain why he’s failing and what we can do about it if we want to change our politics.
For those who don’t want to read a long Twitter thread there is a blog version here. taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2022/03/2… if you want a summary of the whole thread it’s this: the neoliberal thinking that all our main political parties subscribe to is now bankrupt. We need something new now.
Sunak faced a challenge this week. A winning Chancellor has to decide how to secure the support their party needs to win elections. In that case there will always be winners and losers in a budget. So Sunak had to make decisions.
Read 140 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(