Jo Maugham Profile picture
Apr 14 9 tweets 5 min read
#EndOurCladdingScandal takeover [THREAD] 🧵

🚨6 people died at Lakanal House fire in 2009

💚72 died at Grenfell in 2017

🔍The #GrenfellInquiry revealed that the Government has known about dangerous cladding since 2002 [1/9]
Successive governments failed to act ✖️

Thousands more buildings were built with dangerous cladding as a result✖️

Product manufacturers lied about the safety of their products ✖️

#TheyKnew [2/9]

Cladding manufacturers also knew. But they continued to sell dangerous cladding.

#TheyKnew [3/9]

After Grenfell, we heard "never again".

Ministers promised legislation and protection.

They said that leaseholders would not have to pay to make buildings safe.

But bills continued to arrive, many of them life-changing. [4/9]
The Government published the #FireSafetyBill.

The Bill introduced new requirements for fire safety checks - *but didn't protect leaseholders from costs*

Despite a strong rebellion in the Commons and in the House of Lords, it was adopted. [5/9]
The Government said the #FireSafetyBill was not "the right place" to protect us.

They argued that the #BuildingSafetyBill would be the right place to protect us from costs. [6/9]

The Government promised the #BuildingSafetyBill would protect leaseholders against fire safety remediation costs.

But the Bill doesn't protect ALL leaseholders.

Leaseholders are innocent, why should any of us pay for state and industry failures? [7/9]
❗️ We didn't build these buildings. Developers did.

❗️ We didn't certify them as safe. Building Control did.

❗️ We don't own these buildings. Freeholders do.

So, we're going to Westminster on 20 April 🗓️ [8/9]

The Government is writing final amendments to the #BuildingSafetyBill *right now*

This Bill was supposed to protect us.

But you can help us. Please email your MP. It only takes a minute 📨👇[9/9]
endourcladdingscandal.eaction.org.uk/bsb

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jo Maugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

Apr 14
🚨 @EOCS_Official takeover 🥳🧵

We are the #EndOurCladdingScandal campaign.

We’re taking over Jo's account today to tell you why the cladding scandal is not just about cladding, it is a full-blown #BuildingSafetyCrisis which affects millions of people in the UK. [1/13]
On 14 June 2017, 72 people lost their lives at Grenfell.

Almost 5 years on, their families, friends and the wider #Grenfell community are still waiting for justice.

We know enough to say that successive governments have failed to act. [2/13]
theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/a…
After the Grenfell tragedy, many of us living in flats began to realise our buildings were also covered in dangerous cladding.

Then it got worse: leaseholders in those buildings were told *they* would have to foot the bill to remove it, instead of those responsible 💰 [3/13]
Read 13 tweets
Apr 13
When I started expressing support for trans people Private Eye ran a series of toxic pieces about me; it attacked Reclaim These Streets when its feminism was revealed as inclusive; and it has a long history of snide homophobia.
And a number of its writers have written to me expressing dismay at its stance on trans issues. I say this to explain why you shouldn't take anything it writes about Owen Jones at face value. I admire much of what Private Eye does but on this its coverage is very motivated.
Here's one of many pieces documenting Private Eye's long and inglorious history of homophobia. huw.substack.com/p/poove-power-…
Read 6 tweets
Apr 13
Quite a precedent to set - you can commit a crime, be a hypocrite, lie about it to Parliament, all whilst Prime Minister, and still not need to resign.

Where do we go from here?
A decision by the Commons Select Committee on Standards to suspend the PM for ten sitting days or 14 calendar days would trigger the recall process and if ten percent of eligible registered voters signed a petition Johnson would lose his seat and there would be a by-election.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 10
I think The Times is misreporting Javid's statement. He wasn't a non-dom for six years. He was a non-dom for between 13 and 17 years. thetimes.co.uk/article/8c20aa…
This is his statement. He was domiciled elsewhere when tax resident in the US between 1992 and 1996. And then became domiciled on the UK in 2009.
Indeed, if you read his statement carefully, he never says he was UK domiciled prior to 2009. So it is possible - or probable, given how domicile works - that he first became UK domiciled in 2009.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 10
My understanding is that Javid entered into the failed tax avoidance scheme the subject of the UBS and Deutsche Bank Supreme Court decision and settled his tax liabilities under that scheme several years after becoming an MP. thetimes.co.uk/article/8c20aa…
You can read the UBS case here bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/…. You can see that it involves Deutsche Bank (Javid's previous employer) at paragraph 49. It involved offshore trusts and from here bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/… you can see that Deutsche lost in 2012 (when Javid paid up).
Deutsche lost in the Upper Tribunal on 17 September 2012 and Javid became a Minister on 4 September 2012. Him paying up is a possible, or likely, explanation for him saying "on becoming a minister in 2012 I decided to voluntarily collapse that trust."
Read 6 tweets
Apr 9
If @BBCr4today has ever transmitted a sound which did not buttress power, maintain things as they are, or demean those without, it was in error.
I could not believe then, when I arrived in England in 1989, how complacent was the voice of the white English middle class @BBCr4today represented. And thirty three years later I cannot believe it now.
I love my parents in law. Really I do. But I must learn to stay out of the kitchen at breakfast time.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(