I’m beyond burned out. But the pandemic isn’t over. If I have to keep covering it, I want to spend the scrapings of energy I have left on stories that could do the most good. So I’ve tried to focus on pieces that make people who’ve borne the greatest burdens feel seen & heard. 2/
The issues vary but the principles are the same. As fully & compassionately as possible, show what these years have been like for those who’ve borne the worst of them. Create a kind of gestalt mirror that reflects millions of individual experiences. Bear witness to suffering. 7/
These pieces have been, by far, the hardest and most emotionally difficult ones to do. They require absorbing huge amounts of pain, holding it, staring at it, making sense of it, channeling it. My therapist notes similarities in our work… but only one of us has training. 8/
I’ve written a lot about the panic-neglect cycle, framing it as a problem for the future: neglect leaves us unprepared. But we also neglect our past, ignoring the *cumulative* costs of these recent years during moments of calm. 9/ theatlantic.com/health/archive…
Journalism, with our laser focus on the present, is highly vulnerable to this. So these pieces are also a rebuke to that amnesia. To the people I’m writing about, they’re meant to say: I see you. But for everyone else, they’re meant to say: Remember. 10/
That's hard, too. Writing about cumulative costs means there’s no obvious moment for a break. These pieces often get done in lulls between surges; that’s when I have time. It’s also when the problems are salient: Trauma often manifests when adrenaline fades & people exhale. 11/
There are, of course, plenty of journalists who do this too. This thread is partly for them. Stuck on our various treadmills, I feel like we don’t talk enough about *why* we do our work, what our values are, what we hope to achieve, or the costs. In this essay, I will… 12/
The grief piece was hard to a degree even I wasn’t ready for. I can’t keep doing this indefinitely. But I know I can do it for a bit longer. And I'm grateful to my wife, editor, and therapist--the three pillars propping up my mental health. End/
Oh one more thing: I did an interview with Laura van Dernoot Lipsky, author of Trauma Stewardship, about all of this.
Her book is great for those tasked with bearing witness, and she's got a new podcast exploring the issue.
🚨I wrote about the millions of people who lost loved ones to COVID, what they've gone through, and the many factors that have intensified and prolonged their grief.
This piece is my attempt to honor those we lost, and the many more who love them. 1/
Last month, I wrote about why much of the U.S. has normalized to mass COVID death. That piece was about big structural forces. But I wanted to do something more personal and human, to put faces and feelings to the losses. Hence the new piece. 2/
This was a hard piece to write, and I'll say up front that it's probably going to be hard to read. But at least 9 million people are grieving, and I think we owe it to them to bear witness to their losses. Especially because… 3/ theatlantic.com/health/archive…
A nice thing: Blurbs have been slowly coming in for my upcoming book and, dear lord, they've exceeded my wildest expectations.
I'm so grateful to these wonderful people for their kind words, and just delighted that writers whose work I deeply admire enjoyed AN IMMENSE WORLD. 1/
A few more... 2/
And a personal favorite that I'm not allowed to have on the jacket but will live forever in my heart. 3/
🚨I wrote a short piece about the COVID funding collapse--the latest example of the panic-neglect cycle that public health people have bemoaned for decades, and that's now spinning at frankly absurd speed *in the middle of a pandemic*. 1/
I first wrote about the panic-neglect cycle in 2017. At the time, I assumed it would operate on a timescale of years, and that neglect would set in AFTER the crisis was over. Oh, sweet summer child. *pats 2017 self on the head and ruffles his hair* 2/
Immunocompromised people: Can we at least get easy and equitable access to treatments before you decide to give up on preventing infections? theatlantic.com/health/archive…
Govt: What if we do the latter while making the former *more* difficult?
This is the same panic-neglect cycle that dooms us to a perpetual state of pandemic unpreparedness. It's truly amazing to watch it unfold *in the middle of a pandemic.*
This story is in AN IMMENSE WORLD. As is the time I said "Yes!" when a scientist asked if I wanted to see her giant spiders, and then ended up in a large room with several dozen free-range spiders and a lot of silk and flies in my hair.
A few people have argued that the questions posed in this piece can be simply & fully answered with "the GOP" or "duh, Trump" or some such. To them, I ask: Where does one get a mattress so comfortable that one can fall asleep for 14 straight months?
My criticisms of the past administration can be found in... honestly, just take your pick from my back-catalogue, but perhaps start with the 212-word sentence here. Note, though, that even in this piece, the politics are just part of the bigger picture. theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
My point is this: Some folks think polarization is the fundamental problem in the US pandemic response. I disagree. It's an accelerant, for problems that are deeper and older. Politics shape how those problems manifest. But the rot is in the rootstock.