'The #NationalityandBordersBill 2021 with its proposed laws making it easier to deprive Black and Asian people in particular of British citizenship provides a practical opportunity to confront the comforting lies we tell ourselves about what it means for us to be British,
..and how British lawmakers have always defined our sense of identity and belonging.
How often do we console ourselves that British people wanted our help rebuild this nation after its wartime devastation?
The truth is the British Nationality Act 1948, which created the concept of British citizenship and assigned it to white British subjects, aimed to ease outward white British settlement (Australia, Canada, New Zealand) rather than to allow inward migration.
The fact that 800 million subjects of Empire (and in effect 300 million newly independent Indians and Pakistanis) also became British and moved to the the UK is an unintended and unwanted side effect right from the start.'
'This clearly exposes the arbitrary nature of not only our citizenship, but our sense of identity and belonging. There is the consolation that white British people may have later come to realise they needed our help, but they never wanted it as we were soon to discover.
..Defining ourselves by our contribution is going to be the end of us, expecting humanisation from the transactional process of labour. White British labelled “scroungers” for their imagined dependency on the state, never have to question their Britishness,
in coalition with their state that will never remove it.'
'White-skinned Irish people were racialised as non-white in Britain in living memory. The infamous “No Blacks. No Irish. No Dogs.” public notices (‘Black’ then included south Asians, without political blackness making us Black) were very real but also short lived.
The side effect of British Caribbean and British south Asian immigration following the British Nationality Act, also began transitioning white-skinned Irish to white, with ongoing British colonial extraction also forcing many of them to leave their own to care for the Coloniser
..under their National Health Service.
Black and south Asian people generously offered white British people somebody more other to hate. White Irish writer and musician Angela Moran honestly describes this solidarity’s passing nature in her BBC film ‘A Very British History: Birmingham Irish I Am’.
'White British MPs only deprived us of automatic citizenship in 1962 when our numbers in England’s large cities began to terrify them. The freedom to be more ourselves means they can no longer as easily assimilate us into a national identity designed in their image.
Scotland and Wales, with their more progressive governments describe their 94%+ white nations as “welcoming and diverse” shows a high level of white comfort, when much larger in population London is likely to be white minority. Especially with a selective historical literacy,
which is a function of all western nationalisms, assuming this welcome remains as our numbers increase.
(To their credit, the Scottish National Party honestly state they need greater inward migration for economic sustainability with Scotland’s decreasing, in opposition to England’s increasing, population).
In George Orwell’s essay Notes on Nationalism, which was written during the final stages of Word War II he ruminates about Britain’s shared pathology with other Western nations, saying ,’By ‘patriotism’
I mean devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life, which one believes to be the best in the world but has no wish to force on other people. Patriotism is of its nature defensive, both militarily and culturally.
Nationalism, on the other hand, is inseparable from the desire for power. The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality.’
His essay is summed up well surprisingly well here. ‘Orwell compares Nazism with other forms of nationalistic ideologies to generate an overall argument and questions the function of nationalism.’
⤴️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@ActionIpp IPP COMMITTEE IN ACTION ARE A GROUP OF FAMILY MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF IPP PRISONERS. THEY UNITED TOGETHER TO TRY & GET #JUSTICEFORIPPs THAT HAVE BEEN UNFAIRLY SENTENCED TO A LIFE SENTENCE THROUGH THE BACK DOOR FOR OFFENCES THAT WOULD NOT WARRANT A LIFE SENTENCE.
IPP Committee In Action (@ActionIpp) have organised a Protest/March on the 27th April 2022 to make some noise for IPPs such as Leroy Douglas and Abdullahi Suleman and Mohammed Nazir Khan opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocra…
'If you live in Britain and unless you are Sikh or Muslim, you are a Tory. I've not excluded black people and Jews from this sweeping generalisation as it's a bit more complicated for us. White supremacy made it more complicated.'
(if you read to the end of the post you will understand why I exempted British Muslims and Sikhs (in the main) from being Tories, so stick with me. This is all fresh. As usual.)
'The idea of ‘race’ has no fixed definition considering the term has no biological basis. Yet all of us from minority backgrounds know what it is to be racialised, to be lumped together into a group with others who share our physical attributes,
for this to be conflated with our ethnicity – our shared culture, history and experience. What does this mean for those of us who are mixed-race? Could it be argued that the shared experience of being racialised as ‘mixed’ creates a ‘mixed-race’ ethnicity of sorts?
Been watching any TV this Easter holiday? Did you notice The Racial Pecking Order? #MDClassicsfb.me/6wzkOIft1
'Name me a leading classical British actor and you can bet your bottom shilling they’ve done “period drama”. A genre that is all but off-limits to actors of colour. Some might well protest that Downton Abbey recently featured a black character. One.
And the news of his casting made headlines. So we can easily see what a major decision and talking point it is to introduce any actor of colour to a production of this kind.
May 1st 2016: 'Last week, guerrilla projectionists lit up the Australian Embassy in London with the faces of three recently deceased young men, each of whom died while under the ‘care’ of the Australian government in its offshore refugee detention system.
..The protest is all the more potent after another detained refugee died on Friday. 23-year-old Iranian refugee Omid set himself on fire last Wednesday during a visit by UN officials to the Australian offshore detention centre on Nauru.
As he set himself alight, Omid cried out, ‘This is how tired we are, this action will prove how exhausted we are. I cannot take it anymore‘. His death comes after reported delays in providing him with appropriate medical care.
“Britain has lived its long life as an exemplary country, the small island with a massive impact”.
Less than twenty-four hours after David Cameron made this empire-esque declaration at the Conservative’s manifesto launch,
the latest reality of Britain’s brutal impact on the world appeared in newspapers. 400 migrants were reported to have drowned yesterday in the Mediterranean Sea; just months after Britain withdrew support for rescue operations.