Megan McArdle Profile picture
Apr 16, 2022 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Every day on this site I come across someone who is indignant that others are going about their lives rather than maintaining a rigorous schedule of testing, social distancing, and masking. I always want to ask: what the hell did you think the endgame of this virus was?
Did you really think that people were going to keep masking at work and school *forever*? Test every time they go out in public, *forever*? Quarantine every time they have a casual exposure, *for the rest of their lives*?
And if not, when do you think it is going to end? When everyone's vaccinated? Because that's not happening. When covid stops circulating? Because unfortunately, we failed to contain it, and it's now endemic.
I'm not even arguing about the merits of forever NPTs and mass testing regimes. I'm just amazed that anyone ever thought that this was going to become the new normal.
I think there are things we will keep doing in response to covid. Air purifiers. Masks when you're sick (and for god's sake stay home!) But it was never going to be possible to keep folks masked at work or school forever, or limit social contacts to a few close friends.
You should not be on Twitter, waxing indignant to well-boosted people who have resumed their normal lives. You should be doing some deep soul searching about how you so fundamentally misunderstood what was possible for public health to achieve.
I was a hardcore lockdown advocate before vaccines. But now we have vaccines, and whether or not you think it's reasonable to ask folks to continue the precautions of Peak Pandemic for the sake of those who cannot or will not vaccinate, it was never going to happen.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @asymmetricinfo

May 10
Well, my man v. bear column (link in the thread below) has generated a lot of comments--predictably, given that the question was created by an engagement-baiting influencer in the first place. Image
So it's time for another tweetstorm in which I answer the most common objections that were raised to the column, which is here: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/…
First, I will summarize the basic argument of the column, which is: suggesting that you are at higher risk from a man than a bear is innumerate nonsense, and contributes to harmful stereotypes that women are irrational, neurotic, and bad at math.
Read 26 tweets
May 2
I’m sympathetic to protesters who are bewildered by the abrupt volte face, but as I lay out in todays column, think the reason it’s happening is that our civil rights regime is not designed to handle issues that produced conflicts between protected classes, rather than the clean “oppressor/oppressed “ frame our laws and customs assumed. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/…
“Die, Zionist” has a disproportionate impact on Jewish students (as everyone would readily recognize if it was the Unite the Right folks camped in Columbia’s quad. This makes it challenging to adopt a posture of benign neglect towards clear rule violations
Admins could plausibly get away with it if they’d been even handed but of course we all know that a group of conservatives who camped on Columbias lawn and made even one of the troublesome remarks we’ve heard from that camp would have been cleared out ASAP
Read 5 tweets
Mar 13
For whatever reason this post from 2022 went re-viral just as I was reading about various plans to make data more portable and it reminded me of how nerds simply cannot wrap their mind around the fact that most people simply do not want more granular control over their tech.
Many years ago, I unwisely embroiled myself in the Linux wars, making the same point over and over: end users do not want a more flexible, customizable system. They want to trade power for simplicity and convenience.
Linux-heads told me I Didn't Get It and would be Left Behind in Our Amazing Open Source Future, and they were wrong, not because they were dumb, but because they were too smart to comprehend the limitations of the average user.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Bunch of people assuming that the reason I am harping on the Biden age issue is that I want him to lose to Donald Trump. This is wrong; I'm voting for Biden, or whoever the non-Trump candidate is.

So why am I talking about it? Three reasons.
First, Biden's obvious decline is a Thing That is True. My job is Saying Things That Are True (And Explaining What Follows). "Why are you saying this thing that is true?" is a dumb question to ask a journalist. It is particularly distressing when it comes from other journalists.
Second, even if I were inclined to pretend that the Thing That Is True is not in fact true, in order to improve Biden's chance of re-election, it wouldn't work. Folks who think they can make the issue go away if they just work the media refs hard enough are delusional.
Read 21 tweets
Jan 5
Conservatives who are reveling in Claudine Gay schadenfreude might pause to notice that Harvard eventually realized that protecting an insider who had violated institutional norms was destroying the institution, and course-corrected, while the GOP is still saddled with Trump.
This makes an excellent lead-in to my column on that very topic: how progressives trying to fend off conservative attacks on academia instead ending up aping their opponent's worst mistakes: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/…
This episode was a giant embarassment for academia, and not a few progressive journalists, who started inventing new definitions of plagiarism, most of which boiled down to "Whatever Claudine Gay has not yet done".
Read 12 tweets
Oct 6, 2023
Well, Trump has endorsed Jim Jordan for Speaker, which should make things interesting, and provides a nice hook to discuss my column on why the Democrats made a mistake helping Gaetz oust McCarthy. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/…
As you might imagine this was very unpopular with my readers, who made various versions of the same arguments I was tackling in the column: that Republicans are bad, that they don't deserve Democratic help, that voters need to understand how bad they are.
And hey, I hear you. I am also very mad at GOP about a bunch of things. Not necessarily mad for all the same reasons--but you and I are united in our loathing of Trump, our feeling that GOP support of him is despicable, our dismay at the strength of the "burn it all down" caucus.
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(