Been watching any TV this Easter holiday? Did you notice The Racial Pecking Order? #MDClassicsfb.me/6wzkOIft1
'Name me a leading classical British actor and you can bet your bottom shilling they’ve done “period drama”. A genre that is all but off-limits to actors of colour. Some might well protest that Downton Abbey recently featured a black character. One.
And the news of his casting made headlines. So we can easily see what a major decision and talking point it is to introduce any actor of colour to a production of this kind.
Producers have to make the kind of conscious decision they simply don’t have to when they’re casting Caucasian actors.'
'This type of high-quality /high production values TV drama offers the best opportunities for actors in the shape of the most nuanced, carefully written roles, with the best constructed emotional arcs, and with the most technical demands.
Compared to this if an actor of colour is only able to garner roles playing Chinese Take Away Man, Prostitute, Hoodie With Gun or Indian Waiter then the actor of colour surely won’t have the same showcase opportunities as their Caucasian counterparts...
playing Matthew Crawley or Trixie Franklyn.
Nor, crucially, will the actor of colour have access to the same networks.
'Ethnic roles are often very clichedly “ethnic” and badly written. They are also cast with a completely different criteria by people who are literally picking exotic flowers for their garden.
The number of times I’ve been told “they didn’t think you looked Chinese enough” (I’m of mixed descent) is simply too often to be arbitrary. My agent was once told “we specifically do NOT want any Eurasians”.
'On the other side of the coin, I’ve seen casting breakdowns calling for African-Caribbean actors requesting they not be “too dark”.'
'In addition we’re often expected to be de facto cultural “experts”, to speak a range of languages & have all manner of physical “skills” at our disposal.'
'In fact it’s probably fair to say that our TV and theatre industry is still all too often locked in some kind of ghastly 1970’s parody of inappropriateness.
'Surely it’s clear that in the face of this kind of cultural impasse anyone who posits the line that they “never consider race” is being at best naïve or at worse wilfully disingenuous.'
- @DanielYorkLoh
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@ActionIpp IPP COMMITTEE IN ACTION ARE A GROUP OF FAMILY MEMBERS & FRIENDS OF IPP PRISONERS. THEY UNITED TOGETHER TO TRY & GET #JUSTICEFORIPPs THAT HAVE BEEN UNFAIRLY SENTENCED TO A LIFE SENTENCE THROUGH THE BACK DOOR FOR OFFENCES THAT WOULD NOT WARRANT A LIFE SENTENCE.
IPP Committee In Action (@ActionIpp) have organised a Protest/March on the 27th April 2022 to make some noise for IPPs such as Leroy Douglas and Abdullahi Suleman and Mohammed Nazir Khan opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocra…
'If you live in Britain and unless you are Sikh or Muslim, you are a Tory. I've not excluded black people and Jews from this sweeping generalisation as it's a bit more complicated for us. White supremacy made it more complicated.'
(if you read to the end of the post you will understand why I exempted British Muslims and Sikhs (in the main) from being Tories, so stick with me. This is all fresh. As usual.)
'The idea of ‘race’ has no fixed definition considering the term has no biological basis. Yet all of us from minority backgrounds know what it is to be racialised, to be lumped together into a group with others who share our physical attributes,
for this to be conflated with our ethnicity – our shared culture, history and experience. What does this mean for those of us who are mixed-race? Could it be argued that the shared experience of being racialised as ‘mixed’ creates a ‘mixed-race’ ethnicity of sorts?
'The #NationalityandBordersBill 2021 with its proposed laws making it easier to deprive Black and Asian people in particular of British citizenship provides a practical opportunity to confront the comforting lies we tell ourselves about what it means for us to be British,
..and how British lawmakers have always defined our sense of identity and belonging.
May 1st 2016: 'Last week, guerrilla projectionists lit up the Australian Embassy in London with the faces of three recently deceased young men, each of whom died while under the ‘care’ of the Australian government in its offshore refugee detention system.
..The protest is all the more potent after another detained refugee died on Friday. 23-year-old Iranian refugee Omid set himself on fire last Wednesday during a visit by UN officials to the Australian offshore detention centre on Nauru.
As he set himself alight, Omid cried out, ‘This is how tired we are, this action will prove how exhausted we are. I cannot take it anymore‘. His death comes after reported delays in providing him with appropriate medical care.
“Britain has lived its long life as an exemplary country, the small island with a massive impact”.
Less than twenty-four hours after David Cameron made this empire-esque declaration at the Conservative’s manifesto launch,
the latest reality of Britain’s brutal impact on the world appeared in newspapers. 400 migrants were reported to have drowned yesterday in the Mediterranean Sea; just months after Britain withdrew support for rescue operations.