Happy Easter, to my humanist, Christian and other religious friends alike. Renewal, rebirth, eggs - affirmation of life and nature. Go well.
Eggs are a big part of developmental biology, my own field, and I worked with chicks and quails once upon a time. The technique we used was windowing, where you cut a small hole in the shell and cover it with sellotape, and observe development.
This was a technique used by the Polish Jewish scientist Robert Remak in the 19th C, who discovered one of the fundamental cornerstones of biology as a result: Cell Theory.
He found that cells are only born from existing cells, which was an important step in the eventual debunking of spontaneous generation by Louis Pasteur, which had been doctrine for many centuries.
But Remak was denied a full professorship because of his Jewishness, and this idea was pinched by Rudolf Virchow, who gave it a nice Latin phrase - “Omnis cellula e cellula”, and became (more) famous off the back of this.
Virchow, btw, was an interesting fellow and not a complete cad. His public health reforms were great, and once supposedly received a challenge from the Kaiser to a duel, and chose to use an infected sausage as his weapon. Wilhelm withdrew.
Anyway. Remak is one of the great unsigned heroes of biology, a brilliant experimentalist, who was denied his place in history through antisemitism typical of that age.
His son, Ernst Remak was a successful neuroscientist, and his son a mathematician who did significant work in group theory. He was murdered in Auschwitz in 1942.
Anyway, there you go, a little bit of the story of eggs, cells, and how science is never divorced from politics.
Fool I am, it was Bismark who challenged Virchow to a duel, not Wilhelm.
Wilhelm challenged him to a duet, and they did Islands in the Stream for Queen Victoria. She was not amused #HistoryofScience
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sad news about Mr Benn and Elmer author David McKee, who should be remembered above all for the devastating tale of neglectful, lazy parenting, and the immortal heartbreaking line 'But I'm a monster'.
Bernard, a young boy wishes to play with his father, who wants to do some DIY instead, and dismisses him with the line "not now Bernard'. His mother does the same, to wash the dishes.
Bernard informs his mother that there's a monster in the garden, but she's watering a plant, and says 'not now Bernard'.
But there is a monster, who eats Bernard up. And then goes into the house, and also attempts to engage with Bernard's parents, to no avail.
This is in fact quite untrue. The length of a day fluctuates over the course of a year by almost 15 minutes, yet 24hrs remains the metric for a day regardless - meantime. We constantly adjust clocks to coordinate our lives, including the arbitrary addition of days and seconds.
I don’t even know the context of his brainwrong, I just love the absolute confidence of ignorance. In fact, the biggest problem of timekeeping is that while time passes, it is not perfectly coordinated with the celestial forces that wobble in our lives lives.
Hence the clocks and calendars have been redesigned dozens of times over history as we have invented every more reliable timekeepers. We have a whole chapter on the history of time in mine and @FryRsquared’s book.
Today marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of Francis Galton, a man who is largely responsible for the birth of eugenics, and whose broader intellectual legacy is colossal. A thread.
Galton has been part of my life since I joined the now-defunct Galton Laboratory in 1993, and I am still a member of the former Galton Institute - now the Adelphi Genetics Forum. I’ll be giving the Galton Lecture for them in the Autumn. bit.ly/3JyrjLW
He’s fascinating, and awful, but his legacy is part of our present. Here are some bits of Galtonia (from Control, my new book on the history of eugenics).
What this man is saying is absolute bollocks, and why someone so utterly ignorant should be gifted this platform is a mystery to me. Yours sincerely, Geneticists.
Monoamine oxidase is a neurotransmitter. In the 90s a variant in its promoter was found in a family of Dutch iterant criminals.
Since then, it became a variant that became the poster boy of the bullshit genetic determinism fallacy, associated in all sort of behaviours, including risk taking in city traders and gang membership.
Following the publication of #Control, my new book on the history and present of eugenics, here is a thread, using only quotations from some of the key players.
It’s available everywhere, but here’s a link to multiple booksellers 1/n bit.ly/3qnUvPf
The idea of population control via infanticide and selective breeding is ancient. Plato talks about it in theory in Republic, and Seneca describes its practice in Rome.
But it is of course Francis Galton who sciencified eugenics in the 19th C, and spent much of his life advocating for eugenics, with the perpetual analogy of agriculture at its base.
#Control is my new book, out today. It’s the story of an eternal human desire, to rule over unruly biology, to control reproduction, and craft people and populations to be fitter, happier, more productive. smarturl.it/RutherfordCont…
#Control is the story of eugenics, and how a pseudoscientific idea was wedded to a political ideology, a fear by the powerful of losing their ill-gotten gains, who latched onto a neonate science, genetics, and bastardised, misrepresented and cheated it to justify their beliefs.
Just like with the invention of race, eugenics was a science in service of politics. An esoteric idea born in the salons and universities of London, Berlin and the USA, but in just a few decades grew to become one of the defining ideas of the 20th Century.