Listen, I don't want anymore f***ing trolls coming into my threads trying to tell me who I am. I am CLEARLY stating right here, right now that I don't and never will embrace that f***ing title "provider". Why? Because it is a verbal construct of the corporate practice of medicine
2)(CPOM)/PE that was designed to do exactly what it is doing...depersonalize, dehumanize and conflate HCPs. Perfect for a business that doesn't give one s**t about HCPs or patients who they view as widgets and commodities, respectively. I DESPISE the business of medicine--it is
3)antithetical to my oath. It is why I helped co-found Take Medicine Back, to get the Cartel(PE), (CMGs) and Ho's(traitor trash HCPs) the f**k out of medicine because they have turned our house into a Whorehouse of Medicine and the patients into victims. As far as I am concerned,
4)anyone who embraces that vile term embraces the business of medicine. Don't ask me to explain the bizarre Stockholm Syndrome-like hard-on some HCPs exhibit for CPOM/PE. Some people just can't recognize when they are being insulted to their face and react
5)with a "Thank you Sir, may I have more?" sycophantic attitude. I am a writer. Words have meaning. PR folks understand all too well the power of the insidious use of words in marketing. That is exactly what happened in medicine. PCP used to mean "Primary Care Physician".
6)It seguéd to "Primary Care Provider". Ever wonder how? Why? You think that s**t was happenstance? If so, I have a bridge for sale in Siberia. If businesspeople know nothing else, they know marketing. And the most brilliant marketers manage to get those they gouge and
7)victimize to sign on for more abuse. Just read through the f***ing threads and see how many HCPs and people in the public have welcomed that loathsome title warmly into their bosom. Welp, I haven't and I won't. I am a healer. I treat patients--not commodities. I have a calling
8)and a job. I am a cussing Christian and God gave me a gift--the ability to practice medicine. I bestow care, impart knowledge and give of myself to patients. I took an oath. And no where in that oath is that s**t term "provider". My license says "Physician and Surgeon", not
9)"provider". I submit that there is something seriously wrong with a mindset of folks who believe that physicians referring to themselves as "Physicians" or "Doctors", which they actually are, is egotistical. How dare we. I will never understand that logic(or illogic).
10)For those of you who believe that "provider" is innocuous and prefer that detestable word--carry on. But don't you dare tell me how I define myself. I decide that. No one else. #transparencymatters@pppforpatients@TakeMedBack
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some of you may recall the abhorrent Instagram video in which two FNPs performed liposuction on a patient using unsterile techniques. The fact that they were working happily and openly outside their SOP was not the only issue. midlevel.wtf/nurse-practiti…
2)Plenty of HCPs, particularly surgeons and OR/ER nurses were appalled by their lack of sterility...and said so. These FNPs doubled-down stating they did follow sterile technique. You don't know what you don't know. To add to this display of uneducated arrogance, there was no
3)supervising physician in sight. Indiana is a "reduced practice" state, meaning NPs can practice "independently" with a "collaboration" agreement. For the record, "collaboration" agreements are only useful when followed. None of the players in this game collaborated. At all.
VIRGINIA PHYSICIANS!!! The s**t just gets worse. There is a proposed bill(by a NP no less) that permits NPs to practice unsupervised after 2 years while mandating MD/DO to complete 3 years of residency BEFORE they can get a license to practice. Right now they can practice after
2)one year which enables PGY2s and above to moonlight while completing residency. In addition, this legislator wants to remove the requirement for medmal insurance from NPs while MANDATING it for physicians. An idiot can see the writing on the wall. If this legislator can
3)get physicians out of the way, she can push the AANP agenda of NPs replacing physicians. This is absolutely vile. No regard for the public whatsoever. Lower the already in-the-gutter standard of NPs practicing unsupervised while obstructing physicians' ability to care for
2)For those who may not know, the Hattiesburg Clinic in MS is the real deal. An extraordinary clinic with a stellar reputation. Kudos to them for this exceptionally well done study. The authors of the study admit that they were both surprised and disappointed in the results of
3)the study. I will be blunt and state that I am not. I've never understood the success of FPA when it is and has always been evident to me that if you permit people untrained in medicine to practice it, don't expect stellar results. I've also said(and written) that no physician
Dear Med Schools and all affiliated academic centers, STOP using med students as your own personal stash of free labor because you don't want to pay a fair wage to people actually trained to do the jobs you want covered. STOP exploiting med students because you can. Dear
2)Attendings/Supervising Physicians, stop enabling this abuse. Dear Med Students, JUST SAY NO!! You are paying to go to med school--they are not paying you. You notoriously volunteer for many community events and activities w/o being asked. Do not allow these schools/centers to
3)exploit you. Don't interfere with others' abilities to get paid work. RTs, MAs and everyone else on that list should be paid their worth. Don't be a scab. Last but not least, Dear C-suite, get off your fat a**es and transport some patients or bedsit if you don't want to hire
Physician colleagues, please, please, please stop accepting positions from recruiters like the one below. This is how you keep enabling the illegal practice of medicine. In response to a perfectly legitimate question by a physician, he accuses the doc of being egotistical.
2)In addition to being unprofessional, the recruiter is incorrect in implying that an attorney would advise a physician that it is perfectly safe(or legal)for them to "collaborate" with an unknown NP in another state practicing hormone replacement therapy(HRT). For the record,
3)there are no NP programs that exist in the specialty of Endocrinology. New grads and physicians early in their career are vulnerable to this type of sales pitch. Don't fall for it. Unfortunately, there are corrupt and greedy physicians who actually sign up for this s**t.
I typically have no interest in petty, childish tweets. However, this one in particular provides an opportunity to educate the public and HCPs interested in what the law has to say about the title "Doctor" and who uses it. Every state has a Business and Professions code(BPC) for
2)nearly every profession under the sun. That includes medicine and nursing. It is apparent to me whenever this issue arises, physicians and nurses have no clue what the BPC states when it comes to using the title "Doctor". First of all, it is imperative to understand,
3)BPCs ARE STATE LAWS. What one "thinks" or "feels" is irrelevant. A NP may feel that he/she can use the title "Dr." because they have that sham s**t, online, crap DNP degree, but it really depends on what the BPC states. BPCs varies state by state, so one cannot assume. In