PlainSite Profile picture
Apr 20 7 tweets 3 min read
Here's the evidence in the public domain thus far linking Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein / Ghislaine Maxwell.

1. Business Insider reported that $TSLA Director Kimbal Musk, Elon's brother, was set up with a former girlfriend by Epstein. businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstei…
2. According to BuzzFeed, Musk attended a dinner held by Epstein and frequented by a number of other tech titans, including Jeff Bezos and of course, Bill Gates, who ended up getting divorced from Melinda Gates in large part over Epstein. buzzfeednews.com/article/petera…
3. In 2019, The New York Times reported that Jeffrey Epstein was "advising Tesla’s embattled chief executive, Elon Musk, who was in trouble after announcing on Twitter that he had lined up the funding to take Tesla private." nytimes.com/2019/08/12/bus…
4. Musk and Maxwell were photographed at the 2014 Vanity Fair Oscar Party together.
5. During Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal trial, an image of an e-mail from Epstein's servers surfaced on-line that shows Musk and Epstein corresponding about Musk meeting Maxwell.
If you know more—and there is clearly more to be learned about exactly what was going on here—feel free to get in touch.
6. Musk and his second ex-wife, Talulah Riley, admitted to visiting Epstein's mansion on an unspecified date in the middle of syndicated denial stories, in which Riley was denying being an escort procured for Musk by Maxwell. Tip thanks to @JCOviedo6. news.com.au/technology/onl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PlainSite

PlainSite Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PlainSite

Apr 23
This is so bizarre. The court order establishing that Musk lied to investors and acted with scienter is still under seal, but Musk and friends want to appeal it, so now they're quoting from it in public even though it's still under seal. $TSLA

plainsite.org/dockets/3bu26b…
Also, how has Tesla Director of Investor Relations Martin Viecha not yet been banned from the financial industry for life?

"[T]he offer is as firm as it gets."

It didn't exist. $TSLA
Unbelievable. Viecha should be in prison with the rest of them. $TSLA
Read 32 tweets
Apr 21
Although it is not considered a direct conflict, Judge Lewis Liman, who has now been assigned to United States Securities Exchange Commission v. Musk and Tesla, Inc., owned $ARKK in 2018. $TSLA Image
But this is a bit more problematic. Less than a year ago, Judge Liman disclosed that he owns $TSLA shares directly. He must recuse himself, and should have already. Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 16
Between April 1 and April 5, Elon Musk lost an important motion in federal court—in secret. As you can see, Document 387 is missing from the docket. As of today, we know it's a court order from Judge Chen that was lodged under seal. $TSLA
On April 6th, Judge Chen tried to clarify what had happened with Document 387 in entry 390, but he left out some extremely important detail only filled in today with the plaintiffs' TRO motion.
This is a very big deal. Elon Musk went into his media blitz, including the TED interview, knowing that a federal judge had ruled against the very thing he was telling the public. But since the order was and remains (for now) secret, no one else knew (except the plaintiffs).
Read 8 tweets
Apr 14
🚨 $TSLA could get a new trial if Diaz does not accept a (much) lower damages award.

In U.S. courts, the corporations always win.

Updated! Di-az v. Tesla, Inc.: plainsite.org/dockets/38irjs… Image
Here is Judge Orrick's explanation for the reduction. He denied $TSLA's requests for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. Image
CC: Elon Musk, Omar Qazi, $TSLA influencers Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 10
Anyone want to see some redactions magically disappear? $TSLA
In April 2021, in the Tornetta litigation in Delaware about Elon Musk's stock option package, Musk's lawyers insisted that portions of a motion be redacted before being visible to the public. See Document 107.

Richard J. Tornetta v. Elon Musk: plainsite.org/dockets/41zktl…
On behalf of PlainSite, @AaronGreenspan filed a challenge to the confidentiality designations for several documents in the case. And although much is still secret (see Document 200), more is public than before. One item that just became clearer is that motion from April 2021.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 8
Updated! In Re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigation: plainsite.org/dockets/32atfy… $TSLA
It was probably a good idea to sell some stock.
(This is not from a court order, it's from the Plaintiffs' Post-Trial Reply Brief.)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(