Conscious Observer Profile picture
Apr 23, 2022 5 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Governments response to Sussmann is pure fire==>

"In other words, the goal of the joint venture could not have been more clear: it was to gather and disseminate derogatory non-public information regarding the internet activities of a political candidate and his associates. And"
that venture was far from collateral to the charged crime. Indeed, the above-described joint venture was the very project that led Tech Executive-1 to rely upon the defendant’s services; the very project that gave rise to the Russian Bank-1 allegations; the very project
that prompted agents of the Clinton Campaign to meet with Tech Executive-1; and the very project that caused the defendant to meet with the FBI General Counsel and lie to him about the clients who were behind all of this work. As the Government will demonstrate at trial,
it was also the politically-laden and ethically-fraught nature of this project that gave Tech Exec-1 and the defendant a strong motive to conceal the origins of the Russian Bank-1 allegations and falsely portray them as the organic discoveries of concerned computer scientists.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Conscious Observer

Conscious Observer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @conscious_obsrv

May 8, 2022
Judge Cooper WILL NOT ALLOW Bill Priestap & Trisha Andersons Notes to be entered as evidence unless Priestep & Anderson testify. 😳😳

"Moving to the next issue, the defense seeks to exclude notes taken by two of Mr. Bakers deputies sometime after his meeting with Mr. Sussmann."
Review of those rules, however, makes it clear that whether the notes may be read into evidence under either exception depends both on whether Mr. Baker’s credibility is attacked and on Mr. Priestap and Ms. Anderson’s testimony.
Accordingly, the Court will lay out the steps needed to admit the notes, but will reserve judgment on whether such foundation has been laid until trial.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 31, 2022
Live tweeting Sussman hearing.

Judge says Sussmanns defenses position RE: materiality was "NOT PERSUASIVE" !
Defense is arguing that the materiality should be discussed now, and that finding sussman guilty will have a chilling effect on people who would have made tips to the FBI, fearing that they will be prosecuted
*my note on this is that, this would only chill reporting by those people who intend to LIE to the FBI.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(