Even if the tone toward her is negative, she has absolutely dominated the way the Times covers and thinks about this election. In much the same way Trump used to drive media narratives. Lessons not learned, I guess.
The coverage is veering into New York Times Pitchbot (@DougJBalloon) territory. It reeks of the Trump-obsessive coverage in the US. The determination to understand the monster's appeal and working doubly hard to avoid the appearance of liberal bias and thus overcompensating.
I have my own critiques of Macron. And it's fair to say that there's unusual disdain for him relative to the actual state of the country. Whatever his successes, he is a clumsy politician. Still, where are the stories seeking to understand the Macron voter?
I guess they're in the same filing cabinet as the series on understanding the Biden voter?
The default seems to be: Anyone voting for Macron is just choosing the person they hate less. But that's not true. Polls show his approval rating is above 40%, among the highest for anyone seeking re-election in the last 20 years. He was the first choice of 28% in round 1.
The now lionized Chirac was around 48% but at the end of a 2nd term in 2007, and had been in the mid-20s a year earlier. nytimes.com/2007/03/21/wor…
Sarkozy lost re-election in 2012 and because his approval was under 30% most of his term, he was considered one of the most popular presidents of the 5th Republic. france24.com/en/20120514-ni…
And Hollande...FFS, the man had an approval rating of 4% at one point. So inept he didn't even run for re-election. This is what unpopularity looks like. foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/02/mon…
The point is: To paint Macron as somehow unusually unpopular is just not the case. He is one of the 3 or 4 most popular politicians in the country at this point, not bad in a country where hating the president is practically the national pastime.
But if you're going to slobber all over Le Pen's reinvention and the drift to the right over and over, it would seem that it be reasonable to explore some of Macron's achievements, and why many other voters are big fans.
Take France's booming tech sector. That would seem to be a good thing, no? Well, no. Because according to the Times, it has not solved all of France's economic issues (an impossibly high bar).
Readers might be interested to know about a €30bn reindustrialization plan announced last year to catalyze production across numerous sectors, especially green ones. (Wait, isn't Macron purely neoliberal?) France is attracting record foreign investment.
Bottom line: This coverage is lunacy. Fortunately, the Times doesn't have the sway with French voters that it does (or used to?) in the US. But for much of the world, it paints a dangerously inaccurate picture of the country.
*unpopular for Sarkozy of course.
PS: While Jean-Luc Mélenchon came close to besting Le Pen, he was the subject of 1 feature in the Times. If he had advanced, I think collective heads at the Times would have exploded.
Late Surge Has Fiery French Leftist Eyeing Presidential Runoff
Enjoying watching all the representatives of opposition parties on TV talking shit about Macron while blaming him for the country being so divided. Guess we'll see, what happens in June.
I have yet to hear a single opposition offer congrats. Hilarious listening to Rachida Dati rant about the failures of Macron when her party couldn't muster 4%.
I would love for someone smarter on finance to take a deeper look at Musk's financing for the Twitter takeover. From a glance, it seems risky for him. If the Twitter board was feeling spiteful, they should just sell it to him tomorrow because I think it could sink him and Tesla.
The first $12.5b is debt financing and revolving loans through a large syndicate of banks. It would seem this debt is secured by Twitter, which means it would be added to its balance sheet. So a company that has never generated much cash would need to pay? sec.gov/Archives/edgar…
The 2nd $12b is debt secured by Tesla stock (I can't see specifically how many shares). Musk has to turn over control of "pledged" shares to a third party to control while the debt is outstanding. If Twitter goes south, how much risk is there for Tesla?
I only met Tony Hsieh once, very briefly, back in 2000, a few months after I started at the @mercnews. He and Albert Lin had already sold LinkExchange to @Microsoft in 1998. Hsieh and Lin popped up on my radar because they had just started Venture Frogs. urlwire.com/newsarchive/09…
Not only did the name seemly utterly ridiculous, but they decided to locate in San Francisco in the AMC movie theater building AND open a restaurant to satisfy their craving for late-night food. This seemed like the ultimate dot-com bubble absurdity. sfgate.com/food/insidesco…
2 more 20-somethings with too much money. Why should anyone take them seriously? SF was awash with dot-com money and there were so many people making so much money off of so many dumb ideas, it was hard to cut through the nonsense as a reporter and spot the legit entrepreneurs.
This NY Times homepage illustrates my continued frustration with the US media and campaign coverage and the lack of lessons learned from 2016. I count 11 headlines today mentioning Trump/Pence. 1 mentions Harris. 0 mention Biden:
I understand Trump is facing a health crisis. But 11 headlines? Surely Biden said something noteworthy while campaigning yesterday in Arizona? But instead, the media lets Trump suck up all the oxygen as he has for years.
Why does this matter? I highly recommend this episode of @PodSaveAmerica, where they polled in-depth undecided voters (starting about 46 mins). Amazingly, a large number have no opinion on Biden, despite 47 years in public service.
That viral video that got @realDonaldTrump put in the doghouse and @DonaldJTrumpJr temporarily booted wasn't some random viral hit. If you want to see how the right carefully coordinates messages and leverages social media platforms to spread disinformation, then read on.
The group that made the video calls itself America's Frontline Doctors. The website doesn't give much detail about this organization. americasfrontlinedoctors.com
But AFD operates under the auspices of Tea Party Patriots Action. teapartypatriots.org
Today is a notable day in French history : The 20th anniversary of the 'attack' on a McDonald's in rural France. Like so many things that happen here, this story managed to be turned into a caricature of the French as it gained international attention. So what hapened that day?
This New York Times story from the time, just to cite one example, uses the word 'attack' in the headline, and implies in the beginning this was one farmer acting alone. Only after careful reading does it note others were arrested. nytimes.com/2000/09/14/wor…
The central problem was a trade war with Europe. The U.S. was demanding that Europe accept American beef stuffed with hormones. When the EU refused, President Clinton retaliated by placing tariffs on a number of agricultural porducts, including Roquefort cheese.