David Rothkopf Profile picture
Apr 25 7 tweets 2 min read
The richest guy on the 2021 Forbes 400 owns the Washington Post. Number 2 now owns Twitter. Number 3 owns Facebook. Numbers 5 and 6 started Google. Numbers 4 and 9 started Microsoft. Number 10 owns Bloomberg. Free speech? You decide.
Combine this w/the Citizens United formula that money equals speech & so those w/the most money are entitled to the most speech, lack of campaign finance regulation & pols who depend on $ to hold power & you've got a country sinking ever deeper into the quicksand of corruption.
So, if you're just an average American who thinks somehow Musk or some other billionaire is going to enhance the voice of the little guy on the Internet, you are a hopeless sucker who's not paying attention.
And if you think that the trend toward control of public forums by billionaires is not linked to growing inequality and will not produce more of it, more division, more reshaping the narrative to suit those holding the purse strings, you deserve what's coming.
That said, the rest of us don't. We deserve better. And the place that starts is to set basic rules for public forums as we have in media for years--from truth in advertising to libel laws to the late lamented Fairness Doctrine.
Clearly, one of the great looming public policy challenges is going to be creating next generation regulations that protect society from hate, division, disinformation and corruption. Musk's purchase of Twitter only makes that more urgently needed.
To conclude, the right v. left politics of the media is just a distraction that draws attention away from the rich vs. poor and especially the super-rich vs. everyone else dynamic that really drives our politics.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

Apr 13
Let's face it, Macron's track record on Ukraine has been feckless and naive. Putin has played him. He has sought to find the middle ground where there is none.

Fascinating how this conflict has revealed the character of world leaders in so many ways. (cont'd.)
Biden, the leaders in the Baltics and countries bordering Europe, the Finns, the Swedes, the EU's von der Leyen...and obviously, of course, Zelensky, have all shown great strength. Macron, Scholz have waffled. (German FM Baerbock has been much better, stronger.)
Orban, Vucic, Trump, many in the US GOP, have proven to be actively on the side of the enemies of NATO, the West, democracy. Naturally, Putin has been revealed (yet again) to be evil incarnate, a war criminal that history will judge among the worst of our era.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 10
The argument that the Jan 6 Comm. shouldn't make criminal referrals re: Trump et al to DoJ because it might take future prosecution look "political" is absurd. If DoJ decides to prosecute Trump & the GOP chorus will say it is partisan regardless of what the 1/6 Comm does.
Further, if the commission does not refer, the right will say it is because they did not have a case. Also, if the commission has a case and concludes criminal violations were made, it should act as the law demands. Making a criminal referral sends an important message.
This is especially the case if it is based on solid evidence as it certainly will and must be. That evidence must be presented to the public and if it is and it is compelling that no amount of right wing defensive propaganda and whining will be able to erase it.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 4
Would the world be better off with 400 countries instead of 200? 1000? Smaller units of governance that can focus on localized issues. Size of countries used to be linked to security and economic considerations. Those are arguably less important.
Arguably trying to govern big diverse nations centrally is an outmoded approach in a world of networks and distributed, decentralized management systems. Once it mattered if you could mobilize the biggest possible army. That's less important now.
New technologies give more power to smaller actors. (Asymmetric conflict more common.) This will only increase with introduction of autonomous weapons, new cyber capabilities, etc. Small states can amplify security via alliances.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 3
I hope it is clear this morning that the paths to lasting peace and to justice for Ukraine are the same. For now, we must provide Ukraine with all the military, intelligence and other forms of support we can to ensure they defeat Russians and push them out of Ukraine.
We must understand that the only meaningful negotiation with Putin is taking place on the battlefield. He must suffer there. It is also folly and irresponsible to hold in reserve levels of sanctions waiting for Russian atrocities to trigger them. Those atrocities are happening.
No more Russian and gas or oil must be purchased. Sanctions violators must be punished. Finally, we must recognize that once a ceasefire is achieved--the when and where and how of which must be left to Ukraine--the work of ensuring peace and justice is not over.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 2
So many "realists" argue that we must find a way to live with Putin, that punishing him and demanding accountable are the aspirations of idealists with their heads in their clouds. And then I see the reporting from places Bucha and Mariupol. And I ask, "Who are the realists?"
Surely it cannot be the ones denying the reality of the atrocities Putin's forces commit daily. Surely it is not realistic to think that negotiating with him will work when he has never honored any agreement to which he was party.
Surely it is unrealistic to think a ceasefire that gives such a man a way to save face or declare victory will lead to anything but more atrocities. Surely the lesson of 20 yrs of Putin that with him halfway measures & hopes in response to his crimes always come with bodycounts.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 28
What an embarrassing display by the White House press corps. Over and over and over they asked the president about his comment that Putin should not remain in power. He said he was expressing his moral outrage and not signaling a policy change. His answer could not be clearer.
But they did not want an answer. They did not want to accept the story at its face value. They wanted a controversy. Somehow they seemed to feel that it was more important to badger @POTUS over nine words that expressed the view of every sentient moral being on the planet...
...than it was to focus on the tens of thousands of deaths caused by Putin. Somehow they felt that the story was how the president might have hurt the feelings of a war criminal rather than it being that we finally had a president who would call out Putin and stand up to him.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(