The American West has been a core GCSE topic in the UK for decades. But often the way it is taught perpetuates damaging narratives which erase Indigenous voices - much like this US example. Here are some of the things I wish I'd thought more about 16 years ago. A thread... /1
Let's begin with preconceptions. This image comes from an amazing book by Philip Deloria: Indians in Unexpected Places. He shows how such an image reveals many preconceptions which shape how we think about Indigneous presence in North America. /2
My own preconceptions of Native people began young and were shaped by TV westerns. I've spent a whole career unpicking them. Many teachers and students have their own preconceptions as you can see from the survey. It is often an image stuck in the C19th. /3
When asked to comment on Indignous presence today, most tchrs/students left the question blank. Where responses were given there was a focus on cultural destruction, reservations and poverty. The preconception is often that "real" Native people have gone or are disappearing /4
Again, most suggested the Native US population was under 1 mil (49% < 100K) rather than the 9.7 million across 573 tribes of the census. It is unsurprising that, when asked to name the events below, most young people could only name the two on the left. /5
I am v aware that the narratives I was told as a 14yo (pic), and some of the narratives I've taught previously as a teacher have contributed to the 4 key issues outlined below. But where did my own misconceptions and myopias come from to then pass on? /6
I doubt UK teachers want to perpetuate problematic representations of Indigenous pasts or contribute to erasure in the present. But regardless of intent it is too easy to do. I realised I would need to explore how my own preconceptions (and maybe yours) were shaped. /7
Problematic narratives are perpetuated in many ways: through popular culture; works of history, and of course, school textbooks. Textbooks especially play a powerful role in shaping teacher and student knowledge and creating or challenging misconceptions. /8
Traditional histories (think John Wayne film) promoted "heroic settler" narratives in which Native peoples were either ignored or appeared as a barrier to white expansion to be "overcome". See Billington for eg. and play "spot the issue" . /9
Although the "heroic pioneer" narrative seldom appears in UK books, its derivatives do. Eg. referring to colonists as "settlers"; or assuming US colonisation was inevitable, rather than the result of political and personal choices (see example 2). /10
Another derivative is exploring the stories of white colonists without acknowledging their role in displacing Indignous peoples. Abigail Scott is a fascinating person but her father entered into a genocidal war against the Yakama shortly after arriving in Oregon - unsaid here /11
Another theme in many textbooks is to begin by looking at the now questioned "land bridge" migration theory which creates (knowingly or not) a false equivalnece between Indigenous peoples and European colonists as both moving into the region /12
Later, revisionist histories, like Brown's "Bury My Heart..." replaced the heroic narrative with one of a genoicdal US state. However these histories removed Indigenous peoples' agency and perpetuated the view that Native people ceased to exist after 1890. See @DavidTreuer /13
Brown I think has had the biggest impact on UK textbooks. Here you can see how textbooks, resources (and exam boards) recognise genocidal policies but continue an erasure narrative of Native peoples ceasing to exist post 1890. Play "spot the issue" /14
It is also notable that the source materials for exploring Lakota or Dakota lives in many of these books rely on Euro-American authors or artists such as Catlin, Dodge, or Parkman. There is an erasure of Indigenous voices discussing Indigenous experiences. /15
For Lakota/Dakota, the writings of people such as Charles Eastman, Luther Standing Bear or Zitkala Sa are all available via Project Gutenberg and very accessible. There are contemporary voices too via @WoLakotaProject for eg. wolakotaproject.org/oseu-six/ . /16
Brown's portrayal of Indigenous peoples also fed into a growth of more positive but still sterotypical views of Natives as stoic warriors, or spiritual "wise men". Essentialised portayals have therefore filtered into film (Dances with Wolves) and textbooks. /17
All of these issues create misconceptions of about Indigenous peoples as victims without agency, locked eternally in the 19th century past. This in turn effectively erases the Native present and means people fail to see Treuer's vital point here. /18
Of course, New Western History (1980s on) recognised this and sought to correct the record by viewing the West as a place not a frontier. The aim was to take the focus away from just areas of conflict and to focus on accommodation as well. To give agency. /19
My own thinking as a teacher was most shaped by this school of thinking. But the drive to explore the complexity of the West had a knock on impact. In looking at Native agency the danger quickly becomes suggesting Indigenous peoples had agency at all points when they did not. /20
As @Jeff__Ostler points out, NWH has trodden important ground but it also leaves gaps which can downplay genocidal colonialism or fail to acknowledge the impact of colonialism on the present. I have been challenged to unpick my own preconceptions again /21
Reading histories by Native authors, or which centre Native narratives puts a different light on the stories we might tell. @nickwestes for instance argues settler colonialism is the driving narrative in exploring the Native past and present. /22
Ironically, given my love of Marc Bloch, I realised that my own failure to reframe the narrative stemmed from my lack of knowledge of the present. Even a quick read through @IndianCountry articles shows the contining impact of- and resistance to- colonialism /23
So where am I on the journey now? Still learning. As Deloria says - we are all subject to preconceptions but they don't have to rule over us. As @lindstorian puts it - we need to channel our frsutrations into learning. For more on that journey see andallthat.co.uk/america-1789-1… /24
First a little context. I’ve always found “When I needed a neighbour” to be perfectly fine as a hymn but just a little lacking. It’s not especially uplifting and its message is very simple - a moral lesson for small people. But the school and live versions are quite different /2
You may remember the school song going along the lines:
When I needed a neighbour, were you there… and the creed and the colour, etc.
I was hungry and thirsty…
I was cold I was naked (always a giggle point in Y2)…
When I needed a shelter…
So after a full year of messing about @educationgovuk have decided to release more guidance on what an ITAP actually is. Always good to have more guidance when we are already interviewing for these courses! So what jumps out? /1
First, we are reminded why ITAP exists and the links to the Carter Review. What jumps out immediately is that ITAP as isolated blocks of “intensive practice” are at odds with their own evidence base – creating an artificial “other” category for learning. /2
Second, it is clear that ITAP retains the notion that teaching is a hierarchical set of knowledge – a series of techniques to be learned and practiced, rather than a mixture of hierarchical and cumulative aspects which are intricately linked to specific subjects and contexts. /3
In part 4 I want to talk about developing knowledge in history classrooms - something which has been a hot topic for a while. #PGCE#ECF
The ECF and CCF have quite a lot to say about how pupils learn. However much of this stops at the point of considering knowledge transfer and the role of memory. If you are not aware of these basics however it’s worth reading @mfordhamhistory in @histassoc TH166
Fordham is a good starting point for moving us from some generic principles about learning to something more specific about history.
Do a little task now: what have you seen great history teachers do when they develop new knowledge in class?
NEW: Welcome to part 3 of “Things I wish every new #historyteacher knew”. Today I want to explore what all new history teachers would benefit from knowing about the way history works and how we can open this up for young people. As ever I am drawing on @1972SHP Principles 🧵🪡
Before we begin, a little exercise. If you drew a diagram to show how historical interrogations are created, what would it look like? This is a task I get trainee teachers to do every year. If we want to explain our discipline we need to have a sense of how it works.
This is not just a “nice to know”. The National Curriculum actually demands that we introduce young people to the content of history as well as the concepts which underpin it and how it operates. Fulfilling our basic duties as history teachers requires engagement here.
Last time we looked at how new teachers learn. Today I want to think about why we are teaching history at all. /1
Marc Bloch’s “The Historian’s Craft” opens with a child’s question: “Tell me, Daddy. What is the use of history?” It is a question deceptively simple because it requires an exploration of deep truths about what history is and is for. /2
At the age of 4, my own daughter asked me a similar question when I told her I trained history teachers: “Why do they want to teach history, Daddy?” Interestingly, this is the exact way I tend to open my course…by asking that question. Because purposes matter! /3
A new year means 100s of history PGCE / ECT teachers starting prof. journeys.
Our current (& future) ITE system, means many get very limited subject specific input.
This year I’m using a @1972SHP lens to explore the core things I wish every new history teacher knew. 🧵/1
Before we get there I want to begin by thinking about how we learn as professionals, and new professionals especially. It really helps to ensure we are open to growth and less likely to run into potential barriers /2
The first thing to recognise is that professional teaching is a constant process of growth. The teacher we start out as will be substantially different to the one we develop into. Just like Ibn Battuta’s odyssey , it’s a long term journey where we need a curious & open mind /3