If Putin insanely decides that this is a war for the survival of Russia, then we are faced with World War III. Not the rhetorical World War III loosely talked about now, but the real thing, including the deaths of hundreds of millions - in both conventional and nuclear war. /1
This could happen because of how badly the Russian military and Putin have screwed everything up. But if the only alternative is "surrender Ukraine and then all of Europe," then the world will have to fight it. It will be Russia's choice. There is no policy that will stop it. /2
There are alternatives and Putin may yet satisfy himself with his limited gains. But those of you saying "bring it on" don't know what you're talking about, and you don't understand what all of us will endure, together, if the Russians are stupid enough to go this road. /3
The choice to escalate now rests in Moscow. It would be one more ridiculous gamble added to a pile of idiotic strategic miscalculations, but all we can do is help Ukraine defend itself and make clear that there is no day that ends better for Russia than the day before. /4
But if you're an American whose biggest gripe right now is the price of gas or your student loans or inflation, I understand that we live day to day, but this is the most serious thing in the world and you should be paying attention to it. /5
I'm already seeing a lot of responses piling on here about "Glory to Ukraine" and "Putin has to go" and the usual stuff. You can just stop that right now; the only thing that matters is ending this war before it finally burns out of control. Diplomats are doing their best. /6
This war will end with a victory, in the sense that Ukraine will continue to survive. What compromises Zelensky will have to make, I can neither predict nor advise. But there will almost certainly be compromises. /7
I don't what the probabilities are of a major escalation. I doubt the Russians know either. This entire crisis is the result of a bunch of gangsters just winging it when a deluded dictator thought he could grab an entire country on the cheap. This is all improv now. /8
But before you go shooting your mouths off about "taking out Putin" or "it's inevitable, just fight them," you might want to let that go. The next decision rests not with us, but with Moscow. We need to be determined and calm and ready. That's all we can do. /9x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The hardest thing I'll tweet today is that @RichLowry has a point about the use of the word "genocide."
Also:
- Others have said the same
- TASS picking up his piece is not his responsibility
- But "Presidents should be careful about words" seems a new concern for him. /1
Before all of you go berserk over WHY ISN'T IT GENOCIDE, read this @zackbeauchamp piece in Vox. It's not a purely academic exercise. It matters, and there's disagreement out there over the word. vox.com/23020696/ukrai…
But with that said, Rich's shot at Biden is bad faith. /2
Considering that Rich and others on the right preferred Trump to Biden - Trump, a man who was a broken fire hydrant of insanity as president - there is no need to take seriously his sudden concern for presidential circumspection. It's just part of "BiDeN's LOsT iT" nonsense./3
A short thread on ICBM tests *in the middle of a war.*
There two things to consider. 1. Strategy 2. Risk
/1
Strategy:
Do not interrupt your enemy while he is hurting himself. ICBM tests can wait. Putin is basically blowing himself up in Ukraine and the world is focused on that. Why you'd want headlines (that you can't control) saying US TESTS MISSILE DURING CRISIS I have no idea. /2
It would be a needless self-inflicted wound to distract anyone, anywhere, from what Putin is doing. Biden is acting prudently. Cancelling a test while your opponent is leaving his dead on the battlefield is - or should be - a no-brainer. /3
Another important thread from MG Ryan. Amazing how the Russian military is giving briefings about the murder of their own brothers in Ukraine as if it's a normal military operation. The curse of Cain and a stench that will hang on Russia for generations. /1
Yes, you could argue AFG and Chechnya already have cast a pall on the Russian military. But I think this is different. These Russian attacks are pure murder in places their grandfathers fought to liberate. The war is a desecration of the graves of Soviet soldiers. /2
This is one reason I didn't think I'd see the Russians attack Ukraine. I assumed that even Putin, and certainly the officers of the RU military, would hesitate to desecrate the sacrifices of their grandfathers in the Great Patriotic War. /3
Talking with a colleague here about blocking and muting. Emotions are high about the war and the trolls are flooding the zone. But I think the general decline of even basic civility and the bad-faith stuff is leading me to block more often.
/1
I engage here a lot more than most folks, I think. But seeing a lot of people who think a large account is a punching bag, or a diner with a menu ("more this, less that, chop chop, pal") or primal scream session.
I'm just gonna block all that.
/2
No issues with you coming to tell me I'm wrong. That's 99 percent of my day around here!
But I'm not here for you to work out your issues. You want to argue? Cool. Maybe I will. But don't bitch about it later if doesn't go your way. /3
Later in the year, I'm going to do a long piece for @TheAtlantic about what I learned after a quarter century in PME (Professional Military Education). But I want to say two things about the @NavalWarCollege that are really important as I walk out the door. /1
@TheAtlantic@NavalWarCollege First, the College, no matter who was running it, never told me what I could or could not say. We had only two restrictions: Don't violate the Hatch Act, and don't reveal classified info. Beyond that, I was never told to support U.S. policy. We value dispassionate analysis. /2
@TheAtlantic@NavalWarCollege Second, even when I was in pitched arguments about various pedagogical things with my school, they supported my right to conduct research, speak my mind, and generally be a pain in the butt. Again, this was a constant no matter who was in charge in Newport or DC. /3
For those who keep asking why some of us are so worried about the risks of escalation, you have to understand that NATO and Russia have now switched the positions they had during the Cold War. NATO is now the dominant conventional power; Russia is the weaker power. Short 🧵
/1
During the Cold War, NATO had little hope of holding off a Soviet conventional offensive. So we adopted a policy of "flexible response," in which we preserved all options - including nuclear escalation. The *Soviets* wanted to keep it all conventional if possible, of course. /2
This might seem nuts, but we basically told the Soviets that nuclear use became more probable with Soviet victories, since we would run out of options and we'd intentionally escalate. If you want to understand Putin's threats, it's basically something like that now. /3