Moderna initiating eua for under 6 will potentially be part of a larger eua app related to their under 18 cohort which has not yet had action (likely due to concerns about safety signals in 12-17) - so what does this mean potentially ?
/1
Means that moderna has more data than their interim analysis announced March 23 but still not sure if they have 2 month follow up on half the patients yet /2 investors.modernatx.com/news/news-deta…
So the initiation means that the process of submitting full data could take 1-2 weeks and then fda needs to read through hundreds if not thousands of pages to prepare its assessment for vrbpac /3
Then vrbpac is scheduled (seems to be in June which feels an eternity away) but then it’s not clear where the advisory cmte members land on this in light of 2 tensions /4
1. Sense that while immunogenicity targets met/ pre established clinical efficacy endpoints might be <50% and deemed not sufficient
2. Recent cdc data indicating 75% children have been infected
/5
Add to this growing sense that the “pandemic is over” and vaccine mfrs are working on next generation vaccines the worst outcome would be a very close vrbpac vote that sends a signal that under 5 is not needed to meet the eua threshold of “known benefits outweigh the risks” /6
Recall that eua threshold is benefits outweigh risks versus full approval which deems vaccine safe and effective /7
But what is difficult to convey is that the very same vaccines that breezed through vrbpac earlier would also likely not meet efficacy targets due to omicron yet we have now allowed for 12+ to get 1-2 boosters in light of waning efficacy yet under 5 have had nothing /8
So what does this mean? Key dates:
Tomorrow moderna initiates eua
Pfizer submits data and also initiates eua sometime in may
Ba2++ rise peaks and declines in parallel
Vrbpac meets and vote is close/agency has to decide
Acip quickly meets (this has to happen) /9
This continues to prolong what can only be described as systematic calculated torture for parents who at this point absolutely should be allowed to choose in consultation with their pediatrician whether to get vaccinated. /10
EUA benefit calculation must factor immunobridging data as well as some acknowledgment that clinical efficacy of <50% is STILL BETTER THAN ZERO. If advocates wonder where to target efforts it is this point they should drive home. /fin #ImmunizeUnder5s@ImmunizeUnder5s
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/n New CDC Guidance-what it does and doesn't say:
1.Greater emphasis on hospital capacity (for those asking its BOTH hospitalizations for and with covid which is only a thing for people who dont see patients)
2.Allows for higher cases/100k=shifting to phase w/less disease burden
2/n 70% of country is in medium-low transmission= no universal indoor masking recommended including schools (note that color scheme has changed from blue/yelllow/red to green/yellow/orange) - I liked the red-its a universal sign to stop and take it seriously.
3/n CDC recommends that in the medium covid-19 community level you talk to a health care provider re wearing a mask if you are @ increased risk of dz from covid-19. allow me to answer the question here and now. yes, just wear a mask.
Long 🧵on kids vaccine for under 5-understanding how we got here, where we are going and what we need to know.
2/Lets go back to 12/17/21 Pfizer press release:
Compared to the 16- to 25-year-old population in which high efficacy was demonstrated, non-inferiority was met for the 6- to 24-month-old population but not for the 2- to under 5-year-old population in this analysis.
3/ No safety concerns were identified and the 3 µg dose demonstrated a favorable safety profile in children 6 months to under 5 years of age
Japan has an incredibly robust set of requirements around "abnormal deaths" including examining suicide notes/emails, interviews with family members and reviewing documents. They identify major categories (family/health/economy/work/school etc) which also gives us great detail.
Analysis has some serious limitations including exclusion of 30% of deaths/takeaway for the US:
1.we could use similar detail/standardized methods for reporting death by suicide 2. as @miller7 points out we have seen this coming-cont-
The level of suicidal ideation/grief/exquisite pain we are seeing in primary care/peds is staggering. Not a day goes by where patients of all ages/race/identity do not break down in tears but we cram them into 10-15 minute aliquots and hope for the best.
Omicron BA.2 -what we know and some possible scenarios. This is also referred to as the "stealth variant" which has only added to the confusion since the variant IS detected by PCR and Rapid Ag and not as stealth as the name implies.
🧵
2/Omicron not one variant but a family of 3 variants- BA.1/BA.2/BA.3
BA.1 is responsible for almost all cases in the US (the OG variant)
BA.2 has been detected as early as Nov 2021 and is responsible for 45% of infections in Denmark + increasing number of UK infections
3/ It has been detected in the US and will likely become responsible for a growing # of Omicron infections here; it is more infectious and VERY EARLY UK data points to ease of transmissibility especially among household members (higher secondary attack rate compared to BA.1)
Nursing Homes and Covid-19- the state affairs- thank you @JonLemire for taking time to discuss this topic @MSNBC@WayTooEarly a long 🧵 that I start with a picture from a NH in rural Michigan: yep, thats right- 14 staff out with covid-19 infections.
2/ A series of Graphs with situation today: data from @CDCgov illustrating cases by vaccine status-
clear decoupling among those w/ boosters vs not boosted
cases of vax but not boosted quite close to unvax-this is unadj data but reflective of highest efficacy of 3rd dose in NH
3/Next up-cases-data lag by about a week, but state data which maps to experience in many states-note Michigan data below followed by national trend-note low case counts this past year=vaccine.vaccine.vaccine
Thread on Variants- building on excellent work cited by @DrEricDing@CarlosdelRio7@BhadeliaMD but I am trying to distill it for mere mortals (me+my mom) (1/n)
B117 (2/n) 2. People infected have higher viral loads (likely making it more transmissible) academic.oup.com/jid/advance-ar… 3. has mutated in a bad way-evidence of the E484K mutation which is in the SA and Brazil variants-possibly making it even more problematic: sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reactio…
B117 (3/n) 4. 73 people introduced variant into the US and NY was a hub (no surprise) but again this is an undercount most likely: medrxiv.org/content/10.110… 5. here is a pattern of the travel from UK showing likely hubs of spread: