NEW: for the last few weeks I’ve been digging into how the huge pressures on the NHS — both immediate and longer-term — are increasingly forcing Britons to go private.

The result is this, the first edition of what will be my weekly data-driven @FT column: ft.com/content/dbf166…
This was by far the most striking finding:

Hundreds of Britons are now using crowdfunding websites like GoFundMe to pay for private medical expenses.

Yes that’s the *UK*, not the US.

This is one of the most shocking charts I’ve made, even in the context of the last two years. Image
To be clear, many middle class Brits pay to go private to get treated faster, or in a less strained setting — the number going abroad for private treatment has been rising for years — but crowdfunding means hundreds on lower incomes are now going private out of desperation. Image
There are people with cancer, with debilitating hereditary conditions, with career-threatening injuries, all now feeling forced to raise money from strangers to circumvent a struggling healthcare system. Image
We’ve been used to hearing about this sort of thing in the US, but with each passing year the idea that the US healthcare experience is a capitalist dystopia, and the NHS is its socialist antithesis, moves further from the truth.
30 years ago, US out-of-pocket spending on healthcare — costs that cannot be reimbursed through insurance, but are borne by the individual — was more than double that of the UK.

Today, the two are virtually indistinguishable.
Critically, it’s the Britons least able to afford private healthcare who are bearing the brunt.

The share of UK household spending going on hospital costs has risen 60% since 2010, but more than doubled among the poorest, who now spend as much as the richest in relative terms.
Another way of looking at this is the concept of "catastrophic health spending" — when a household’s out-of-pocket medical costs are so high that they amount to as much as 40% of total spending, threatening their financial security.
The brilliant @sarahmsthomson ran some numbers for me, finding that one-in-14 of the UK’s poorest households now find themselves facing such costs, up from one-in-30 a decade earlier.

That’s thousands of struggling British households whose medical costs now exact a huge toll. Image
And while waiting lists remain as long as they currently are, it’s entirely possible things will get worse before they get better.

Since the pandemic took hold, as waiting lists have climbed skyward, the number of new UK medical crowdfunding pages has followed. Image
And waiting lists are not created equal, either.

The share of people who have been waiting more than a year for treatment is twice as high in the most deprived areas as elsewhere.

Every day, this is tipping more already-struggling families towards costly private care. Image
For years there have been fears that the Tories would sell the NHS, but frankly this narrative distracts from the real NHS privatisation story:

The slow forcing of ever more Britons into the private sector as they desperately seek treatment they’re struggling to get from the NHS
To be clear, this thread and my column are not an attack on the NHS, nor call for the NHS to be "tackled" in some way.

This is a call for more to be done to help the NHS, and in the coming weeks I’ll be digging into where the biggest and most transformative changes can be made.
Here’s the column again. Please read it, this is really important. ft.com/content/dbf166…
Some thanks:
• First up, to @cthomasippr who was an invaluable guide for this piece on everything from policy to data
• Second, to @sarahmsthomson and team for doing that custom analysis of catastrophic health costs
• Third, to @JonathonHolmes4 and @jacoblant for more guidance
And fourth to @AliceFishburn, @theboysmithy and others at the @FT for giving me the opportunity and encouragement to get into the column-writing business.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Burn-Murdoch

John Burn-Murdoch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jburnmurdoch

Apr 28
Some professional news:

Starting today, I’m going to be writing a weekly data-driven column for @FT.

I’m equal parts terrified and thrilled, but hopefully this first one — a deep dive into the Brits forced to crowdfund private healthcare — is a good taste of what’s to come
My goal for the column is to find vitally important topics — whether in the UK or anywhere else — that are under-discussed or poorly-understood, and to use data and charts to increase the breadth and depth of understanding of the issues.
I’ll be looking at everything from healthcare, social attitudes, energy & climate change, to politics, policy and even an occasional bit of sports.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 27
For those wondering about y-axis:

A volume can rise 100%, 200%, 1000%, but can only ever fall 100%

Showing that on linear scale is therefore misleading coz you give more than 10x as much space to something that grows 10x, as to something that shrinks 10x

Log scale fixes that.
Log scales remain massively under-used, and the persistent use of linear scales in these situations means a lot of people misunderstand important numbers/patterns/trends.

Thankfully after the last two years, log scale literacy is much higher than it once was 😀
And for the "but most people still don't understand log scales!" holdouts:

I do not care.

The goal is that they understand the chart, not the scale.

If they see a line sloping up to +100%, and a line sloping down at the same angle to -50% (equal relative changes), job done 👍
Read 8 tweets
Apr 20
Literally no one:

US politicians: "don't worry the homeless can't use the bins as houses"
I spent a few months in San Francisco five years ago, and the treatment of homeless people as a nuisance (at best) or a hazard (at worst) was one of the most shocking things I've seen.

Completely broken society.
Britain needs to do far, far more to reduce homelessness and help those who are homeless, but at least we tend to treat the homeless as human beings.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 20
PSA: please dont share the egregiously misleading stat that "100 companies account for 70% of GHG emissions"

By that definition, driving cars & flying planes & burning gas doesn’t produce any emissions because they’ve already been attributed to the firms that drilled the oil/gas Image
Clickbait headlines and press releases like this are irritatingly common, and are *always* nonsense once you spend even 30 seconds looking beneath the surface.

Here was @FullFact’s take (the source of my screenshot) fullfact.org/news/are-100-c…
Fossil fuel companies have done (and continue to do) enormous damage to the environment. So have many governments and big corporations.

But to pretend that if consumer behaviour transformed and we all stopped driving and flying and using gas, emissions wouldn’t fall, is absurd.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 20
This super @PopovichN chart is imo the single most important message to give people about diet and climate change.

You can cut your dietary carbon footprint almost as much by replacing beef & lamb with other meat, as by going totally veggie.

Eating green needn’t mean no meat.
Why is it important?

Because a lot of people baulk at cutting out all meat.

And if we actually care about changing behaviours rather than feeling morally superior, a [slightly] smaller shift that people will make is more important than a bigger shift that people won’t.
When we implicitly present a false binary of "veggie/vegan or meat eater", we make it incredibly easy for the latter to decide "well I’m sticking as I am then".

We effectively prevent huge numbers of people from reducing their dietary emissions by taking smaller steps.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 13
Really excellent thread from @VictimOfMaths on data visualisation as communication, and what that means for chart choices.
I give a lot of talks on dataviz, and this slide is near the beginning of every one of them.

It always surprises me that it needs saying, but it does.

Data visualisation is far more a communication skill than a technical/mathematical skill.
Nobody cares whether you used R or Python or d3 or Tableau or...

Nobody cares how many lines of code you wrote (if any).

They care that the chart speaks to them.

I started making charts because I wanted to communicate more effectively, not because I like maths.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(