How these systems divide in terms of task and layer.
Also useful equipment recognition as these are the specials that the UA will have wanted to destroy early on in the campaign.
2/
In case you wondered what made up the Leer-3... then here you go.
The RB-341В "Leer-3" electronic warfare system supported by Orlan-10 drones. Task is to intercept satellite navigation signals, 3G, 4G communications and text messages.
But as I've been pointing out in my other threads and writing on hacking, SIGINT and battlefield communications, this stuff makes up one end of what we call the new war ecology as we describe it in #radicalwar.
5/
And what I really love about this UA General Staff slide deck is that they are happy to use images taken by the Russians themselves on their personal smartphones.
Photos the Russians no doubt post on their personal social media feeds... 😀
Twenty yrs ago I started a self-funded PhD. I wrote about small arms. As of 2020 this had been downloaded 4780 times (KCL has taken the counter down now) & on academia viewed 2223 times.
I did this at my own expense. No would fund a PhD on guns. 1/
A prof willing to call out Western infatuation with “manoeuvre warfare” & argue (correctly IMV) that we’re seeing the war through the lens of a Ukraine info op & consistently poor Western punditry.
“The fact is that Western military science, which has not been tested against a peer enemy in more than a generation, has got a major development in warfare seriously wrong, radically overestimating the power of offensive manoeuvre by highly mobile, digitally-networked forces…”
that are relatively light, highly expensive, and in short supply—a ‘basket’ in which it has invested all its metaphorical ‘eggs’…”
Now NATO is caught in a dilemma. Countries need to re-arm but they hope for a short war.
They want to prep for the greater threat - China - but must buy for European deterrence.
In the mean time there’s a gap between ambition & industrial capacity.
In the meantime, defence companies are themselves in a dilemma. They should be able to ramp up production - with time - but they need to know that orders both come in and won’t just dry up.
States need to decide. Europe or China? Which one comes first?
Hi @SteveJFeldstein we map your paper in a book @andrewhoskins and I published with OUP in July 2022. This discusses the collapse of civil-military distinctions.
I go onto explore this in detail in Ukraine over several academia documents. 1/ amazon.com/Radical-War-At…
The first of these free papers is here and considers the new information ecology.
The second paper discusses the targeting cycle.
The final paper discusses the Berkeley protocol and the implications for civilians and the armed forces. 2/ academia.edu/resource/work/…
"The state of digital humanities is always several categories of obsolescence behind, which is inevitable. But more crucially, the humanities have not fundamentally changed their approach in decades, despite technology altering the entire world around them"
And just in case you want to see the knife twisted:
"The humanities promise students a journey to an irrelevant, self-consuming future; then they wonder why their enrollments are collapsing"
ooof
LOL
"What happens when both processes can be significantly automated? Going by my experience as a former Shakespeare professor, I figure it will take 10 years for academia to face this new reality..."