Thread: The biggest power that right-wing media has over its audiences is what it doesn't tell them about.
It's a very deliberate strategy that is frequently used to control what the GOP voter knows about.
While there are many true extremists who vote Republican, many of the party's voters are low-information people who actually think that Democrats are more extreme.
This position is nonsensical given that Democrats never sent a mob to kill the vice president. But...
If you are just a regular Republican who thinks the media are hopelessly liberally biased, you know almost nothing about 1/6. You don't know that it was filled with violent gang members, that many people had weapons, and that many have been charged with sedition.
You certainly don't know that literally every single one of the right-wing conspiracy theories about supposed voter fraud in 2020 have been totally debunked, or that the Trump campaign people didn't believe them either.
Right wing media never, ever talks about this stuff. Instead, what they talk about endlessly is how the Democrats are woke transsexual socialist communist fascists.
They also deliberately never talk about GOP controversies.
As I noted earlier, right-wing media suppressed the story of Kevin McCarthy's admitting the obvious truth that Trump's people were the ones who led a mob to march on the Capitol.
They're doing the same thing now with Marge Greene's bigoted and ludicrous attacks on the Roman Catholic Church being supposedly under the control of Satan. This story is literally what everyone in GOP circles is talking about privately. But it's suppressed in right-wing media.
Fox News, Breitbart, Townhall, and Daily Wire, have all suppressed the Greene story entirely.
These same outlets, who constantly suppress stories about Republicans, also frequently turn around & accuse the mainstream media of suppressing stories, such as the Hunter Biden laptop story.
They ignore all the legit reasons why no one touched that one:
There are times when I believe the MSM has had a centrist Democratic bias, but it's light years removed from the constant bias that right-wing media exhibit daily. It was a huge reason why I stopped working in right wing media after creating two of its most popular sites.
Another example: On Monday, @pbump reported that Fox anchor Sean Hannity asked Trump's then-chief of staff Mark Meadows for instructions on Election Day 2020 and dutifully replied "Yes sir On it" after receiving them washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
Hannity, who advised Trump on a daily basis and almost never disclosed the fact to viewers, is far from the only right-wing media figure with hidden conflicts of interest. Almost all of their outlets have staggering conflicts which they never disclose.
For instance, the Daily Wire was literally created in 2015 by Ted Cruz's top donors to flood the right-wing ecosystem with propaganda in support of his presidential run. They never disclosed it:
Many right-wing media outlets are also directly owned by churches or religious organizations seeking to steer Republican opinion in their direction:
🟥Epoch Times, Falun Gong
🟥Washington Times, Moonie cult
🟥AFR Radio, evangelical ministry
🟥Townhall, evangelical B2B
Many other rw media websites are directly owned or affiliated with political action committees who will "report" on candidates or legislation they lobby or spend on. Almost never do they disclose this information. Here's a handy list from @TheRightingtherighting.com/media-guide
People in the mainstream press have talked endlessly about how there are "two different worlds" in politics. This is how the right-wing panopticon was built and how it keeps people in line to support Trump's every action and word.
Meanwhile, there are almost no advocacy media organizations on the political left to counterbalance the thousands of websites, radio, television, and web shows that exist on the right.
This is also deliberate. Democratic donors are dominated by antiquated consultants.
Democratic consultants have become obsessed with voter registration and finding new voters. They don't care much at all about staying in touch with or learning from people who are occasional voters.
Right-wing media does this for the GOP and it's profitable.
It's a lamentable fact that Democratic politics is utterly and totally dominated by a small cadre of extremely rich consultants who learned their trade in the 1980s and 90s. They think that placing an op-ed somewhere or making a video ad is a great triumph.
Right-wing media is the "secret sauce" that binds the entire GOP coalition together.
Democratic consultants think it's just a bunch of nonsense. Which it is. But it's so much worse.
Please share this thread & support me if you can. Someone needs to tell the truth. /end
Bonus: Check out this RedState article about @Acosta interviewing Marge Greene. Notice two things:
1) He deliberately doesn't quote from the Greene text saying that GOPers wanted martial law to stop Biden.
PS: Don't take my word for it. This effect has been empirically tested. Fox viewers who watched CNN actually were made aware of information that they'd have totally missed otherwise theguardian.com/media/2022/apr…
This political bubble is patterned after a similar campaign that convinced millions of Christians that being a far-right Republican is the only way to be a good Christian.
One thing I do agree with Elon Musk about is that bot activity on Twitter is excessive. In fact, there's a bot campaign right now going on to boost lies about Section 230 of Title 47 of the US Code. What's happening is worth a look... (1/n)
Before he became president, one of the campaign pledges that Joe Biden ran on was to reform Section 230. He repeatedly spoke of a need to change it. This was common knowledge and widely reported.
After he became president, Joe Biden continued to hold the position that Section 230 needed to be changed. @PressSec stated this in the 11/19/21 briefing: whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Just a reminder: When Twitter's own data scientists studied political content discovery on the platform, they found that the site's algorithms are biased in favor of the political right.
Their conclusion fits what anyone can see as well. For one example, you can scroll through @FacebooksTop10 for daily tallies of the top content on Facebook. It's always overwhelmingly dominated by far-right figures.
Stating these facts makes far-right people very upset because they don't understand that individual accounts getting banned is only a tiny part of the picture. Multiple anecdotes are not data, in other words.
People who don't monitor right-wing media really have no idea about how extreme the US right's elites are.
Occasionally though, they'll admit the larger goals. In this clip, a Fox host implies that so-called "parental rights" groups are really about destroying public schools:
Notice that when Lisa Kennedy Montgomery makes her remark, Kayleigh McEnany, Trump's former press secretary, nods as if it's a routine, obvious statement.
Attacking teachers & public schools has always been integral to the modern US right. And that's because it is, more than anything else, a religious rebellion against science & separation of church/state that began in opposition to evolution.
So now that the Twitter sale to Elon Musk has been approved by the company board, there are a lot of angles that I figured it might be worth a thread to discuss...
Musk has been talking about moderation a lot and wanting to open-source the Twitter algorithms. Opening up the content moderation and surfacing (ie what gets promoted) algorithms would be a good thing.
What would be far better is if Musk totally opened the Twitter APIs.
There are multiple Application Programming Interfaces to Twitter or any social network, but the most important is how it handles other networks. In almost every case, social networks reject affiliation with other networks.
Understanding these differences explains why Republicans prefer stoking culture controversies over talking about domestic policy and also why Democrats have not passed progressive economic policies that their voters want.
Political discussion is largely the product of beneath-the-surface social trends that do not generally get discussed. On the right side of the aisle, political science research has shown that millions of GOP voters actually have liberal economic viewpoints.
There are many reasons why "alternatives" to Twitter like Gettr, Gab, Truth keep failing, but the biggest one is that the inherent value of Twitter is not its features or staff, it's the community that's emerged here. ...
Aside from Reddit, which is very polarizing also, Twitter is the most text-heavy of the major social platforms. You have to enjoy reading quickly and not be annoyed at the quirky interface which includes URLs (something many people still don't understand)
From a User Experience standpoint, the Twitter experience is really pretty retro. It's the closest modern thing out there to an old-school IRC chat room where anyone could bump in and offer their two cents.