1) the college funding system is monstrouly perverse and needs to be changed fundamentally
2) the byproduct of that is a lot of very very bad and predatory debt that's having terrible human and economic costs that should be cancelled
3) there *will* be political backlash, of course.
4) total debt cancellation would produce some very weird and bad distributional outcomes that while relatively small would be genuinely politically toxic and substantively indefensible.
5) it's easy to avoid that pitfall but just capping the total amount per lender forgiven.
truly nothing captures the strange combination of absurdity and menace of the current moment than MGT texting the President's chief of staff urging him to declare Marshall Law.
Lol *MTG. If i was the kind of crypto-fascist who was texting about martial law I would 100% spell it wrong. #GlassHouses
@kateashaw1 who is the most scrupulous, error-free person on God's green earth definitely just liked the above tweet.
Like: "She sent him a link to a YouTube video labeled “TRUMP STING w CIA Director Steve Pieczenik, The Biggest Election Story in History, QFS-BLOCKCHAIN.”"
I mean...
“Watermarked ballots in over 12 states have been part of a huge Trump & military white hat sting operation in 12 key battleground states,” she wrote.
I've been thinking alot about what a left/liberal approach to the question of Pulic Order would look like, because I think it's a pretty missing part of the conversation.
I write a bit about this in A Colony in a Nation, but recently I've come to think of it as the Smoker on the Subway Platform problem. If you say to me, do you want the cops to confront and arrest someone who is smoking on the subway platform? I would say, Absolutely not!
And if you say: the two options are: a) the cops confront and arrest him or b) nothing, I'll opt for nothing. But also, it seems eminently reasonable to say "I don't really want people smoking on the subway platform."
The Covid discourse is weird and nasty because I think it just absolutely sucks to go through two years of a pandemic. But one thing that feels weird now is that the winning side in the "get back to normal" debate seems very angry about losing the debate even though they won?
I mean things are not back to normal because there's still a very active, highly transmissible, infectious disesase that's getting people sick and killing 2000 people a day. But from a policy perspective, the vast vast majority of stuff is open, including schools.
And I'll say I think that's roughly correct, policy-wise. Large scale NPI's - particularly closures - are not really on the table for good reason. Vaccinating and boosting 80+% of the population should be the priority along with...