‘The eye of mumsnet’. The implication being that only middle aged women can possibly object to the conflation of sex and gender - and of course, we know middle aged women have zero worth.
So let’s have a look at these mumsnet users
Seems to be quite a lot of legal/academic and male tweeters objecting
"...we are committed to reforming the Gender Recognition Act, banning conversion therapy for all LGBT+ people, and believe that trans women are women and trans men are men. We do not believe that this in any way runs into conflict with the rights of cisgender women and girls"
I think if you want someone's vote, they are entitled to ask you why you believe this - why you reject the opinion of the @EHRC, and many thousands of women. Or would such questions be 'transphobic'? (of course they would)
"Political extremism is common in the UK, as is anti-trans extremism. If at any time you feel that engaging in a debate will be unsafe for you or others around you, please withdraw and ensure that you are not in a position where you/they are likely to be harmed."
Not a single assertion here is true. There is no evidence for any of it. There is no evidence about the current cohort of 11 year old girls being given testosterone. We will see the evidence in the next decade when the medical negligence law suits start.
This person transitioned well after puberty. This person did not risk their fertility, their adult sexual function, their bone density and their neurological function before they were old enough to consent to a tattoo.
One might therefore ask why we have fully grown adults with capacity to make grossly unwise decisions, demanding that young children, who have very little capacity to decide anything, are allowed to make decisions about life long, irreversible, extremely serious interventions.
Surely it is inevitable now that this investigation must extend to Mermaids given the amount of public money it has received thetimes.co.uk/article/sajid-…
And it can’t come soon enough. That in 2022, I can still hear people like @AmyNicks_ demonstrate that they have swallowed whole every single debunked lie about the efficacy of medical transition for children, to dismiss outright the issue of detransition, is outright alarming.
To claim that the answer to the issues around sport is to create yet more children who are denied puberty, at an age when they cannot consent, is not merely alarming, it should be criminal.
#LawFare is - in my view - our primary and most effective weapon against the corrosive overreach of gender identity ideology. It means taking legal action to reaffirm the rule of law. Two excellent examples are Miller and Forstater.
Both their cases were hugely significant, have shifted the landscape and provide the bedrock for many other cases to succeed.
Of course, there have been wins and losses. But even the losses - like Bell - still have a power that reverberates beyond the court room. Keira Bell’s story was heard around the world and was an important part of shift in view towards medical transition of children.