Friendly reminder that literacy isn’t an uncomplicated apolitical good, and the framing of it as an “important life skill” ignores the context that makes it necessary for survival.
What makes literacy “necessary for life” is that it’s needed for filling out forms and opening bank accounts and other such activities that are only ways to have access to resources people are robbed pf by default
When tankies talk about “raising literacy rates” and “pulling people out of poverty” when praising states, they ignore that states are responsible for the creation and continuation of problems they “solve”.
Not to mention that “literacy learning” and schools are often a vehicle for spreading cultural hegemony.
The only person engaging with this tweet in good faith was @derLutzelmann (will get back to your replies soon, you made good points!) and everyone else is just doing incoherent tankie/statist babbling
Lmao, all these replies and QTs. You know for such avid supporters of literacy, you’re not really good at reading comprehension 💀💀💀
Damn why’d they delete
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Knowing more doesn’t make your politics better if it isn’t already on the right track. I know plenty of people who have read books I’ve never read that explain my views better than I ever could and have garbage politics, because the way knowledge affects you is informed by your
values, and your standpoint. Cops see themselves as experts on crime, prison guards think they know prisoners better than those who “naively” want them being treated better. Same with bosses and their workers, parents and their kids, farmers and the animals they exploit, etc.
proximity doesn’t guarantee care and compassion if your way of relating is tainted by power. Likewise, it colors whatever knowledge you gain. It integrates it into the pre-existing antagonistic framework. So I hold much more respect for “naive” and “ignorant” compassion than
“Gonna establish a mechanism of violent control and coercion, and when that inevitably causes harm, I’ll put another form of violence on top, and another, and more, and whenever any of these systems are challenged, I just point to how they’re in place to keep away harm!”
Literally authoritarian legalistic logic. Just maintaining a network of coercive mechanisms with the “promise” of protection when in reality these all just work in unison to fuck us all up.
I got a lot of shallow ass takes from motherfuckers saying I’m against the very concept of written language and bullshit like that, but fucking anarchists joining the dogpile to call me “not a real anarchist” and an “anprim” for pointing to what should be obvious to literally any
person who looks at compulsory education and the mechanisms of coercion that get illiterate people to suffer (such as barriers of access to housing, finding jobs, opening bank accounts, etc.) is especially eggregious. Sure, join the fucking bandwagon and be one of the fucking 900
QTs full of tankies, fascists and liberals, including the ones that tell me that I should fucking get shot with your lazy ass reading of my tweet. For what purpose exactly? Being praised for “not being one of the bad anarchists?” Fuck you lol.
There’s nothing in my tweet that implies that literacy is “nothing but” a tool of state repression, nor am I on a crusade against the concept of written language. My point is very simple: a society wherein not being able to (or wanting to) read and write puts you in danger is
rotten. You can enumerate plenty of good things about reading and writing (including the preservation of native languages), but none of that is related to my point about compulsory literacy, in a single language (chosen by the state), as a means of survival.
The erasure of native languages (written and oral) is in large part DUE TO compulsory education and the need to learn colonizer languages to be able to navigate state bureaucracy and capitalism.