A lot of #PoliticalTheology going on in Psalm 9. It picks up on a theme from Psalm 7 about the Psalmist appealing his just cause to God. If you weren't convinced that this involved political language, Psalm 9 makes that conclusion overtly.
When appealing for his just cause, David (the Psalm's author) expresses confidence because, he says to God, "you have sat on the throne, giving righteous judgment." Sitting on the throne is a clear political picture, the place where the king acts authoritatively.
David then contrasts the political status of "the enemy" to God and His kingdom. The enemy he rebuked. But how? He ended them in "everlasting ruins." In particular, David notes that "their cities you rooted out." The image of the city is a frequent one for a political community.
Thus, God punishes other peoples by ending their status as a political community. The ultimate judgment temporally speaking. By contrast, "the LORD sits enthroned forever." Moreover, David states that God "has established his throne for justice."
The preceding reiterates the purpose of rule. In punishing the wicked and protecting the innocent, you uphold justice. The Psalm goes on to say that in so establishing, God works constantly toward that end, judging the world with righteousness and the peoples with uprightness.
In doing these things, David emphasizes one part of God's justice: He "is a stronghold for the oppressed." The strong need the law less than the weak. The weak face oppression, in fact, from the strong. The coercive force of political rule brings in might to ensure right.
In addition, a later passage here makes sure to note that God not only vindicates the cause of the oppressed. He "is mindful of them." Later, "the needy shall not always be forgotten." Implies a love toward, not a grudging administration of justice.
The Psalm concludes by asking God to intervene according to the principles laid out in the preceding verses. While God exemplified just rule, in a world of sin we don't see it perfectly. David asks "your will be done on earth as it is in heaven" to a fuller degree than now.
In these passages, we do see principles for human rule and limitations as well. No human rule sits "enthroned forever" and, given sin, that's a good thing. Nor will any human rule achieve perfect justice. But we can try to approximate both to the degree possible.
1) a steady, longstanding rule can bring peace and prosperity while 2) we seek justice as closely as we humanly can.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Psalm 10 has much #PoliticalTheology regarding oppression. Digs into the mind/heart, not just the words and deeds.
The heart of the oppressor includes several sins. First, arrogance (vs. 2). This arrogance is also called pride (vs. 4). The essence of the arrogance/pride is two-fold. First, the posture toward God. This evil man's thoughts are "there is no God."
If there is no God, then the oppressor in some sense believes he is God or a god. This man also is "greedy for gain." Aristotle said the difference between good and bad ruler is whether he rules for himself or for the people. These oppressors if they are rulers are the bad ones.
Quoting Gratian, Sir John Fortescue summarizes the natural law thus: "that which is contained in the LAw and the Gospel, according to which every man is commanded to do unto another what he would have done unto himself...
and is forbidden to inflict what he would not have done unto himself."
Interesting. Fortescue also claims that, since Old and New Testament laws approved of the natural law, it, too, is included in Jesus' statement "I came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it."
Some evening political theology from the Psalms. Psalm 7 says that "The LORD judges the peoples." This judicial act is defined in the next verses. The Psalmist next asks God to judge him according to his righteousness.
Then, he calls on God to end the wickedness evil while establishing the righteous. Together, we have the purpose of human government according to Romans 13: approve the good and punish evil. The Psalmist petitions his ultimate ruler to fulfill these goals.
Verse 10 says the Psalmist's shield is with God and that, consequently, God will save the upright in heart. This point only restated what came before. Punishing evil and establishing the righteous include protecting the innocent from oppression.
Reading Psalm 2 as well (it is morning of the first day of the month after all). Personal turns more political. The rebellion against God of which it tells is total. The rulers do it and their people.
What does it mean to burst bonds and cast away cords? Bonds and cords seem to be laws. God's laws. Laws bind. The political communities reject God by rejecting His law. Important link: ruler's authority manifested in His rules.
Wisdom for rulers then defined. It starts with serving God in fear. Remember the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Including political wisdom. Then rejoicing in God's rule with trembling. No politicla authority on earth is ultimate. None self-generates its legitimacy.
Psalm 1 (and 15) describe the Christian magnanimous man. Adorned with all the virtues and friendships grounded in those virtues. Psalm 119 is that man singing his love for the law. A love, virtues, and friendships that need a prior act of Divine grace to happen.
The heart of flesh first must replace the heart of stone. Grace then heart/deeds of gratitude. Consequently, one can begin to love and act rightly (virtue).
Back to Psalm 1, the man meditates on the law (reason) and delights in it (affections).As a righteous tree, he yields fruit (good deeds). He is planted by streams of water to constantly refresh him (a source outside himself...grace again as starting point)
If a code of laws won't even protect a defenseless part of the polity from intentional killing, then the most basic end of government isn't being upheld. By Genesis 9:6 or Romans 13 standards.
Plenty more laws and government should be doing in rewarding good and punishing evil. And, no, not all sins should be codified or virtues, either. Goes yo purpose of government in curtailing outward actions and some prudence on how far that's possible.
But prudence on abortion is how to get to the end of it as a legal order or socially wanted. Anything short of that makes one ask what good government is for at all.