Adam Mastroianni Profile picture
May 2, 2022 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Chart-topping original movies have gone extinct. People have a lot of explanations for this, but they're all incomplete because they don't realize the same thing is happening everywhere. An oligopoly has conquered all of popular culture.
In television, for example, it used to be pretty rare for two versions of the same show to appear twice at the top of the viewership charts. Now it's common.
The oligopoly has come to music, too: the number of artists on the Billboard Hot 100 has been decreasing for decades (chart cred: Azhad Syed, towardsdatascience.com/hot-or-not-ana…)
And literature. Until 1990, it was pretty remarkable for one author to have multiple top-10 bestselling books. Now it happens almost every year.
And video games. These days, basically *all* bestselling games are franchise installments.
Why is this happening? I think there are four important factors:
experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/pop-culture-…
Most importantly, I don't think we've realized what all these sequels and spinoffs are doing to us. It's not that they're bad––some are great! But movies, TV, music, books, and video games should expand our consciousness, and they can't do that by feeding us reruns forever
btw if you liked this, I do this every other Tuesday on my blog experimentalhistory.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Mastroianni

Adam Mastroianni Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @a_m_mastroianni

Jun 7, 2023
My paper with @DanTGilbert is out today in Nature: people believe that people are less kind than they used to be, they're probably wrong about that, and we have an idea where this illusion comes from. nature.com/articles/s4158…
My whole life, I've heard people complain about the demise of human goodness. "Used to be you didn't have to lock your doors at night!" etc. Is this just a vocal minority, or do most people believe this?

Turns out, it's most people. 177 surveys, N = 220,772. Here's a sample: Image
This isn't just the US. In 2002 and 2006, Pew sampled folks in every country highlighted in red below and asked them whether moral decline was a problem in their country. In *every single country* a majority of folks said it was at least a "moderately big" problem: Image
Read 25 tweets
Apr 11, 2023
There are two kinds of problems: strong-link problems and weak-link problems.

Weak-link: quality depends on how good the *worst* things are

Strong-link: quality depends on how good the *best* things are Image
Figuring out which kind of problem you're facing is really important, because the way you solve them is totally different. Image
Here's the thing: ***science is a strong link problem***

How do you know? Well, we don't believe in little sperm-boys anymore Image
Read 8 tweets
Dec 27, 2022
Recently I wrote a post suggesting that peer review doesn't work, and then some weird things happened. A tenured professor threatened to get me fired. Strangers sent me unhinged emails. (People said nice things too.) This week I sort through it all.

experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-dance-of…
One common argument: "peer review is a barrier against misinformation; without it, wackos like creationists could publish their 'findings' unhindered!" Well, here's The Journal of Creation, a peer-reviewed journal all about creationism. creation.com/journal-of-cre…
One highlight was this comment from Richard Smith, former editor of the British Medical Journal, who did a lot of the research on peer review I cited.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 14, 2022
Science ran a big experiment on itself for the last ~60 years. It didn't work out.
experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and…
People think peer review has been with us for centuries. Not really! Scientific publishing was always a hodgepodge and most outlets were nothing like our current system. Pre-publication peer review only became common in the 1960s. lps.library.cmu.edu/ETHOS/article/…
This system of peer review takes a ton of work. Scientists a collective 15,000 years reviewing papers every year. …rchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
Read 12 tweets
Sep 19, 2022
We live in a golden age of people writing words on the internet. Here's some top-tier stuff I've read recently.

1. "The Scientific Virtues" by @mold_time. Required reading for anyone who wants to do science.

slimemoldtimemold.com/2022/02/10/the…
2. This piece by @IDoTheThinking. I always thought gentrification = luxury apartments and Sweetgreens. I was way off.

darrellowens.substack.com/p/the-look-of-…
3. This, from @jasonacollins. Every time I go to a conference there are a billion new biases and nobody seems to be worried about it and we should be. worksinprogress.co/issue/biases-t…
Read 10 tweets
Mar 7, 2022
Published today in PNAS: people don't know how American public opinion has changed. I've been working on this for a very long time and I'm excited to share it. Here's a thread so you don't have to read the paper. pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
(If you do want to read it, this link will be available until the Feds shut it down. Science should be free!) shorturl.at/deuJ9
A few years ago I got into reading lots of public opinion polls, and I was constantly surprised. People became *more* in favor of immigration after Trump's election? Support for gun control has *fallen*? White Americans feel as warm toward Black Americans as they did in *1964*?
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(