Excerpts from an incredible exchange between South Ossetian “President" Anatoly Bibilov and a group of soldiers who refused to fight in Ukraine for lack of weapons, comms, and command. They told him that Russia is losing the war. zona.media/article/2022/0…
The exchange is more honest and direct than anything you’d expect in this breakaway statelet. Bibilov criticizes individual soldiers for returning from the front and complaining about problems in combat. The soldiers push back, describing absolute chaos.
“You probably don’t know this, but a lot of guys have already come to me, asking to be sent [to the front], and they’re not talking about money or ‘Give us weapons.’” Trying to shame the soldiers for requesting weapons!!
The soldiers told Bibilov how they were deployed to areas 800 kilometers away from where they were supposed to be, artillery fire missed targets by 2 kilometers, but officers didn’t care, and groups were constantly ambushed due to the lack of battlefield intel. An utter mess.
In late March, roughly 300 soldiers from South Ossetia refused to fight under these conditions and returned home. About 100 have since reenlisted and some of these guys are already back at the front. A couple dozen are still disputing their dishonorable discharges in court.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Disaster for the Kremlin, if true: Ukraine says it’s found “Granny Anya,” the elderly woman now celebrated in Russia for waving a Soviet flag at Ukrainian troops. Anna Ivanovna Ivanova & her husband are now in Kharkiv after their home came under Russian artillery fire. Yikes.
In the video, she appears to say that she greeted whom she thought were Russian soldiers with a Soviet flag in an attempt to stop them from destroying her town. The interview is heavily edited, however, so it’s possible that her remarks are being distorted.
“I’d rather not have this celebrity or this war. I don’t want it. We’d be better off without this war,” she appears to say, rejecting her hero’s status in Russia, where they’ve literally built statues to her.
Putin’s domestic policy czar Sergey Kiriyenko joins United Russia functionary Andrey Turchak & DNR head Denis Pushilin at a ceremony in Mariupol to unveil a monument to “Granny Anya,” the senile old woman who greeted Ukrainian soldiers with a Soviet flag. denis-pushilin.ru/news/denis-pus…
At this rate, it’s not beyond imagination that Putin might readopt the Soviet flag, perhaps after annexing the rest of eastern Ukraine. The embrace of this confused old lady is remarkable and actually seems to resonate with the public.
Big report from @wwwproektmedia about catastrophically under-equipped Russian soldiers in Ukraine, propagandists’ clumsy scramble to sustain public support for the war, & the Kremlin’s own bumbling. dpiy1t0nlwafj.cloudfront.net/narrative/kak-…
As is the case with such reports, this one is based in large part on anonymous sources and hearsay, so factor that into your reading, as you will.
Proekt says the decision to invade was such a surprise to nearly everyone in the govt that some even criticized the war at first, but this public dissent (from some nominal opposition politicians) was soon nipped in the bud.
A pro-Kremlin Russian think tank called the Social Research Expert Institute has released a remarkable report, titled “How They’re Killing the Free Press: Factcheckers as an Instrument of Western Counter-Propaganda & Censorship.” It’s as bad as it sounds. eisr.ru/upload/iblock/…
The authors describe the Democrats as a “single party that’s merged with the state apparatus and secret police.” They cite the Will Smith / Gene Hackman 1998 film “Enemy of the State” as evidence of govt surveillance. Pluralism no longer exists in the media or academia, they say.
The authors also cite the 1997 film “Wag the Dog” as an example of manipulating public opinion. (These guys really watch a lot of American movies.) They also fault the U.S. for “expansionism” (rather ironic given the timing of release report during Russia’s land grab in Ukraine).
Interview with Kira Yarmysh (Alexey Navalny’s spox) about her new novel but also about Western pressure to “cancel” Russian culture. I see no evidence that Russian liberals grasp the logic of “cancelation,” which in this case demands a top-to-bottom “anti-colonial” reassessment.
For instance, comments like “it would be strange to cancel Pushkin because Putin started a war against Ukraine” totally miss the argument (not mine personally) that imperialist attitudes will poison everything Russian until there’s a grand reckoning (and probably atonement).
In the US, this is similar to Americans who say “yes, America has made mistakes, but surely we needn’t renounce Jefferson because of modern-day racism!” The logic of the criticisms here goes further than many realize. (Mind you, I’m not advocating anything — just observing.)
In a recent article, RIAC Director of Programs Ivan Timofeev argues that the Ukraine war has triggered simultaneous crises for Russia that will test the mettle of the state and society. He seems to view the moment as an opportunity for Russia’s self-reinvention.
Timofeev talks about how the war worsened Russia’s strategic situation and unified the West, but he also says it’s the angry, resource-deprived masses, not the authorities, inciting repressions and purges of fifth columnists.
He says many Russians who left immediately after the invasion are returning, supposedly realizing that their fears of what would happen inside Russia were”exaggerated.” Lost skilled laborer hurt, but not the “bohemians” who fled.