Slippery slope: the rationale - that life begins at fertilization - what about pregnant women who drink, smoke, take drugs, or engage in other behaviors that might endanger that fetus?
Are they guilty of assault?
Should they be locked up in order to stop that assault?
Are they guilty of assault?
Should they be locked up in order to stop that assault?
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY!
FETAL PROTECTION CENTERS
A new market/revenue stream now opening for #GOPFascists and their dark money donors -
Lucrative government contracts available from the new Czar of Life at DHS who is now accepting resumes for ‘Aunt Lydias’ nation wide.
FETAL PROTECTION CENTERS
A new market/revenue stream now opening for #GOPFascists and their dark money donors -
Lucrative government contracts available from the new Czar of Life at DHS who is now accepting resumes for ‘Aunt Lydias’ nation wide.
FETAL PROTECTION CENTERS where pregnant women are detained and/or monitored for behaviors that might endanger the fetus are a whole new revenue stream for beleaguered #GOPFascists. A sanitized version of the chain gangs sheriffs rent out to local farmers.
Invest now!
Invest now!
I was in house counsel for a hospital system specializing in risk management/mental hygiene and was often asked by providers whether a pregnant woman could be ‘confined’ against her will if she takes drugs or drinks to excess. Pre-Alito, my answer was a definitive ‘no’. . .
A SCOTUS opinion that reduces pregnant women to little more than fetal vessels is truly dystopian.
Just think of the myriad ways women of child bearing age will be monitored by the state and, if pregnant, have their autonomy/rights subsumed by the needs of the fetus. . .
Just think of the myriad ways women of child bearing age will be monitored by the state and, if pregnant, have their autonomy/rights subsumed by the needs of the fetus. . .
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
