Ok, guys, we have a problem. Putin’s secret $700m yacht is about to escape the sanctions by simply taking off from Italy. It’s a matter of days now. The Italian authorities are doing nothing to stop it. So we should.
The Scheherezade superyacht was floated out this Tuesday. After some final checks, it will be ready to sail away to Turkey, Maldives or wherever the Russian oligarchs are now hiding their yachts from being arrested.
The New York Times writes that the Italian authorities have not completed their investigation into the ownership of this yacht, so they cannot arrest it. Despite the overwhelming evidence that the yacht belongs to Putin. nytimes.com/2022/05/04/wor…
I am particularly concerned about this. The Italian authorities told @FinancialTimes that they were in touch with us, the Anti-Corruption Foundation. But they weren’t. We haven’t received a single email or phone call from them. They haven’t requested any evidence from us.
We filed a formal complaint on this matter on 23 March 2022. Have we received any response? Nope. Nothing. Niente. It seems to me that they are really unwilling to act.
There is not much to investigate here. The U.S. authorities believe that this yacht is Putin’s. The crew members say it’s Putin’s. We have established that the Scheherezade crew is almost fully composed of Putin’s personal staff.
By “staff” I mean military personnel from the Federal Protective Service, whose only job is to manage presidential protocol. Their job is to follow Putin everywhere. So they went to Italy.
And you know what the Italians claim? That the yacht belongs to oligarch Eduard Khudainatov. I mean yeah, sure. A dozen of state employees working at the Federal Protective Service simply decided to take care of some oligarch as well. WHY NOT.
The yacht crew (different sources spoke to us and the NYT independently), must have confused this gentleman with Mr. Putin. It’s so hard to tell them apart, after all.
You know what this reminds me of? This recent @WSJ article about the U.S. authorities not imposing sanctions on Putin’s mistress Alina Kabaeva because it’s ‘too confrontational’. wsj.com/articles/u-s-w…
What a brilliant logic, right? They don't want to upset Putin to avoid escalation. But what more could Putin do? Bomb and eradicate a country in the middle of Europe? Start a genocide? Mass rapes? Threaten to nuke the whole world? He is already doing that, hello!
Here is a simple solution to prevent Putin’s precious Scheherezade from sailing away this week. Italy must sanction Khudainatov (or whoever is the yacht’s owner on paper) right now. Today. So the yacht stays in the EU instead of sailing away to some exotic islands.
We have proved beyond reasonable doubt that this yacht belongs to Putin. It’s $700 million (maybe more) ready to be arrested and seized. And I am asking the Italian financial police not to embarrass itself any further and just do it.
If you’re in Italy right now, feel free to pay a visit to the Scheherezade. It’s right there at the dock and apparently it doesn’t have an owner. Exact coordinates attached for your convenience. Hurry up, it might be gone tomorrow. goo.gl/maps/2gYgwzjGT…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/21 Did you know corporations like Apple sometimes help authoritarian regimes survive? Not by accident—by choice. Dictators rely on their complicity to impose censorship and tighten their grip on power. The Apple you know is not the Apple we see in Russia. THREAD 🧵
2/21 Over the past year, Apple has bent over backward to comply with Putin’s government’s demands. They’ve systematically restricted Russian users’ access to independent media and removed countless VPN apps from the App Store—tools vital for bypassing censorship.
3/21 I’m sure you don’t realise how bad it really is. In October Apple removed the app of the independent Russian language TV channel Current Time. In November BBC Russian Service podcasts were banned, along with those from The Insider, Echo of Moscow, and Radio Liberty.
Часть переписок Невзлина, которая касается Латвии, мы передали латвийским журналистам. И вот вчера вышло несколько сюжетов, которые проливают дополнительный свет на всю эту историю. Журналисты докрутили тему про паспорт и про то, как Невзлин "мочил" других олигархов. Рассказываю!
Среди них Гусинский, Дерипаска, и в первую очередь, Петр Авен. Невзлин заказывал, а Блинов размещал материалы через желтые СМИ, которые входят в группу компаний Петериса Шмидре. Все эти материалы без труда можно найти, как и обсуждение денег, которые были за них заплачены.
Невзлин очень смешно вычитывает статьи, находит там ошибки, а еще даёт их на проверку некоему "Киселеву". Предположу, что речь об известном журналисте Евгении Киселеве, который, к слову, сейчас рьяно защищает Невзлина.
1/28 Воспользуюсь информационным поводом, чтобы рассказать вам немного о работе международного отдела ФБК. Фоновой работе, которой и мысли не было хвастаться в паблике. Но на прошлой неделе я чуть со стула не упала от удивления и возмущения, увидев ЭТО. Тема нам не чуждая. ТРЕД🧵
2/28 Сначала разберёмся, что все обсуждали на той неделе. Максим Кац создал в Израиле фонд, который бегает по грантодателям и просит денег на КОМПЕНСАЦИЮ ВЫПАДАЮЩИХ ДОХОДОВ ютюб-блогеров. Логика такая: тебя признали иноагентом >> доход от рекламы упал >> возместите разницу.
3/28 Заметил это Майкл Наки, возмутился от двумя вещами. Тем, что в докладе, который де факто является грантовой заявкой, упомянут его канал. И тем, что ютюб-блогеры, о которых идет речь в заявке, скажем мягко, не самые первые в списке нуждающихся.
Жарков в своей колонке точно замечает, что "демофобия наряду с абсолютизацией роли рынка — один из столпов российской либеральной догматики 90-х." Если речь зашла о демофобии, мне вспомнилась другая статья, ссылку на которую я подсмотрела у В.Гельмана. Авторства кружка Чубайса.
Чубайс возглавлял некий научный кружок или ассоциацию, и это их видение того, как должны проводиться либеральные реформы. Еще до того, как Чубайсу выпал шанс реально эти реформы проводить, в его голове царили антидемократические взгляды и тотальное презрение к людям. Мини-тред👇
Суть статьи (1990 г) в том, что Чубайс и Ко рассуждают о политическом сопровождении предлагаемых ими рыночных реформ. Какая политическая поддержка им понадобится. Первое, что предлагается - разогнать профсоюзы, если они не поддержат реформы. А вместо них создать свои, карманные.
1/14 Politicians are often asked, "What have you done in your first 100 days in office?" It's a symbolic amount of time, of course, but enough to show some intent. So today, I would like to ask Western officials, "What have you done in the 100 days since Alexei Navalny's murder?"
2/14 We've heard countless times from world leaders that Putin is personally responsible for Navalny's life and safety. If a hair falls from Navalny's head, Putin is in trouble. Well, now Navalny is dead. What were the consequences for Putin? NONE.
3/14 It's actually worse than none. The UK sanctions package in response to Navalny's murder included six individuals. Six prison employees who live in the village of Kharp. These people most likely haven't even considered traveling abroad, perhaps not even outside their region.
Ever wondered what happened to this? It was a widely discussed and supported initiative to sanction Putin's 'authorised representatives'. Those individuals who endorsed and officially participated in Putin's electoral campaign. Here is the answer: nothing. Nothing has happened.
I am still convinced that the idea is brilliant. We proposed to preemptively announce that anyone who would join the list of Putin's endorsers will be sanctioned immediately after the election. And this would discourage celebrities from joining.
And I think even just this public discussion kinda worked. In the first December list of Putin's 'authorized representatives', there were indeed fewer famous people than usual. We were hopeful and continued to bombard the EU authorities with our proposal.